DOJ claims subpoena of FBI agents in Hunter Biden probe is unenforceable.
The Department of Justice Rejects Subpoena in Hunter Biden Probe
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has responded to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan’s subpoena of two FBI agents, stating that it is constitutionally null. This comes as part of an ongoing investigation into Mr. Hunter Biden and allegations of DOJ interference to protect him.
On August 21, top Republicans in the House issued a subpoena for four individuals from the FBI and IRS, claiming that these agencies had information regarding DOJ meddling. The investigation centers around a meeting held by U.S. Attorney David Weiss on October 7, 2022, where it is alleged that higher-ups at the DOJ played a role in blocking charges against Mr. Biden.
Related Stories
According to IRS whistleblowers, Mr. Weiss informed investigators and agents from both the FBI and IRS during the meeting that the decision to press charges against Mr. Biden was not solely his. Whistleblower testimony also alleges that the DOJ hindered the investigation by slowing its progress, refusing to enforce search warrants, and preventing charges from being filed against Mr. Biden in both the District of Columbia and California.
In response to these claims, Republicans, including Mr. Jordan and House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, issued a subpoena for four individuals present at the October 7 meeting, including FBI special agent in charge Thomas J. Sobocinski and FBI assistant special agent in charge Ryeshia Holley.
Assistant Attorney General Carlos Felipe Uriarte has now informed Mr. Jordan that the subpoenas for the two FBI agents “lack legal effect and cannot constitutionally be enforced” due to the ongoing investigation. Mr. Uriarte also mentioned that earlier, Mr. Biden was offered a plea deal that was ultimately rejected by the judge, leading to criticism from Republicans.
Despite rejecting the subpoenas, Mr. Uriarte expressed the DOJ’s willingness to negotiate with the House Committee on the Judiciary. He suggested that there may be room for compromise, such as allowing agency counsel to be present during the agents’ deposition. However, he emphasized the importance of protecting the integrity and fairness of criminal investigations and proceedings.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...