The epoch times

Driverless vehicles in San Francisco continue to face issues.

Driverless cars in San Francisco are still causing traffic jams, even after they were approved by the ⁢state.

San Francisco residents were‍ again caught off ‌guard this weekend after General Motors’ Cruise automated cars continued to block roads while navigating, according to social media posts‍ and ‌local ⁤media.

This comes only a few days after California⁣ regulators⁢ approved self-driving ​taxi companies to deploy their driverless cars throughout the city.

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), which regulates ‍self-driving cars ⁣in the state, voted three-to-one in favor to permit Waymo and Cruise to operate‌ their vehicles full-time, despite warnings from‌ safety advocates and first responders.

The⁢ decision allows people in ‌San Francisco to⁣ pay for a ride in a ⁢driverless taxi, in an attempt to supplant human cab⁤ drivers and ride share services with automated ‍competition.

Incidents Expand

Cruise spokesman Drew‌ Pusateri told ​CNN that the arrival of its 24-hour driverless car service ⁣was a “historic⁢ industry milestone,” putting its cars “in​ a position to compete with traditional ridehail, and ​challenge an unsafe, inaccessible transportation status quo.”

However, several video ‍posts on X, formerly known as ⁤Twitter, showed at‌ least 10 Cruise vehicles ​failing to blink their hazard lights in San Francisco’s North Beach​ neighborhood during a ⁢music festival.

According to CNN, one⁤ poster described the traffic incident in ⁤a tweet as a ​”complete meltdown.”

Other eyewitnesses told CBS News affiliate KPIX-TV that driverless cars had blocked ‌intersections on the⁢ evening of Aug. 11 for about 15 minutes.

Authorities​ were concerned that ⁢driverless cars​ would‍ impede emergency vehicles from accessing the area.

The incident came one day after ‍the CPUC voted for their approval, despite dissent from local officials.

Cruise responded to critics by ​explaining that the music festival “posed wireless bandwidth constraints causing delayed connectivity to our vehicles.”

The GM affiliate promised that it​ was⁢ “actively​ investigating and working on solutions to prevent ‌this ⁢from happening again,” and ⁤that they “apologize‌ to ​those who were impacted.”

Attempts​ to Restrict Automated Cars

The​ San Francisco⁣ Police Officers Association, San Francisco‌ Deputy Sheriffs’ ⁣Association, and the‍ San Francisco Fire Fighters ​Local‌ 798,‍ had all written to the CPUC,⁢ warning that driverless vehicles could hinder emergency responders or cause‍ additional accidents.

“The time that it takes for an ⁣officer or any other public safety employee to try and interact with an autonomous vehicle is frustrating in the best-case scenario, but when they can not comprehend our demands to move to the side of the roadway and are ‌stopped in the ⁢middle⁤ of⁢ the roadway blocking emergency response units, then it rises to another level‍ of⁢ danger,” wrote Tracy McCray, president of the ‍San Francisco Police Officers Association, in ⁣June and added, “That is unacceptable.”

The San Francisco ⁤Fire⁢ Department also complained⁢ after recording 55 incidents involving driverless vehicles interfering with emergency response teams so far this year, ‍reported CNN.

“They’re deploying hundreds of ​cars on our streets. They should take a timeout ⁤and a pause, until they p



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker