Elon Musk hits back at woke advertisers: ‘Go F*** Yourself
Elon Musk Fires Back at Advertisers Trying to Blackmail Him: ‘Go F*** Yourself’
Elon Musk didn’t hold back when responding to advertisers who were distancing themselves from his social media platform after he made a controversial comment. During the New York Times DealBook Summit, Musk made it clear that he didn’t want their advertising support. In fact, he told them to ”go f*** themselves.”
When asked for an explanation, Musk didn’t mince words. He expressed his disdain for anyone who would try to blackmail him with money, stating, “If someone is going to try to blackmail me with advertising, go f*** yourself.”
“BREAKING: Elon Musk to advertisers trying to blackmail 𝕏 into censorship: ‘Go f*ck yourself.'” – ALX (@alx)
Musk made it clear that he didn’t want advertisers to support his platform if they were going to use their financial influence to control him. He even called out Disney CEO Bob Iger, who had explained why Disney pulled its advertising from Musk’s platform.
Sorkin, the Times columnist, tried to argue that the advertising boycott would harm X financially. Musk responded by saying that the world would know that those advertisers were responsible for killing the company, and he would document it in great detail.
According to The New York Times, around 200 major advertisers, including Disney, Apple, and IBM, stopped placing ads on X after Musk supported a comment that accused Jewish communities of promoting hatred against white people. The boycott could potentially cost X $75 million this quarter.
Musk admitted that he shouldn’t have replied to the controversial post and expressed regret for the unintended consequences. He emphasized that he cares about the reality of goodness, not just the perception of it.
Despite the backlash, Musk remains unfazed by the haters. He stated that he has no problem being hated and believes that wanting to be liked is a weakness.
The full interview can be viewed here.
Musk’s bold response to the advertisers trying to blackmail him has sparked a heated debate. Read more about it here.
How does Elon Musk’s refusal to cater to the demands of advertisers challenge the norms of the advertising industry?
Yourself.”
Musk’s strong response came after several advertisers decided to distance themselves from his social media platform, Twitter, following a controversial comment he made. The comment in question sparked outrage and led to calls for advertisers to boycott Musk’s platform. However, instead of backpedaling or expressing regret, Musk stood his ground and made it clear that he didn’t need or want their support.
During the New York Times DealBook Summit, Musk was asked about the advertisers’ response. Without hesitation, he responded with a blunt and profane retort. While some may see his reaction as disrespectful or unprofessional, Musk’s response sheds light on a larger issue in the advertising industry.
In recent years, advertisers have had increasing sway over platforms and public figures. With the power of ad revenue, they have the ability to influence content and dictate the actions of those they support. This dynamic has led to a rise in censorship and self-censorship, as individuals and platforms strive to please advertisers and avoid controversy.
Musk, however, is no stranger to controversy. Throughout his career, he has been known for his unfiltered and sometimes controversial statements. This boldness has earned him both admirers and detractors. But what sets Musk apart is his willingness to speak truth to power, even when it comes to advertisers.
In his response, Musk made it clear that he refuses to be controlled by advertisers. He sees their attempts to distance themselves from his platform as a form of blackmail, an attempt to silence him through financial means. By telling them to “go f*** themselves,” Musk is asserting his independence and refusing to cater to the demands of advertisers.
While some may argue that Musk’s response was unnecessary or crude, it serves as a reminder that there are individuals who are willing to challenge the status quo and reject the influence of advertisers. In an age when advertising dollars hold significant sway, Musk’s defiance is refreshing and may even inspire others to resist the pressures of the advertising industry.
This incident also raises important questions about the delicate balance between advertising and freedom of expression. Should advertisers have the power to dictate who can say what and when? Should public figures have to cater to the demands of advertisers for fear of losing financial support? Musk’s response challenges these norms and forces us to reconsider the influence of advertising in our society.
As the media landscape continues to evolve, it is important to reflect on the role of advertising and its impact on freedom of expression. Musk’s fiery response to advertisers trying to blackmail him serves as a reminder that individuals should have the autonomy to express themselves without the fear of losing financial support. It also highlights the need for transparency and accountability in the advertising industry.
In conclusion, Elon Musk’s bold and profane response to advertisers distancing themselves from his platform raises important questions about the power dynamics between advertisers and public figures. While his language may have been provocative, his message was clear: he will not be controlled or silenced by those who try to manipulate him with money. Musk’s defiance serves as a reminder that individuals should have the freedom to express themselves without fear of financial repercussions and that the influence of advertisers should be scrutinized.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...