Washington Examiner

Emmer to propose bill targeting rulemaking and administrative state

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer Introduces ​Legislation to Sunset Major Rules

In an exclusive move, House Majority Whip‍ Tom Emmer (R-MN) is ⁤spearheading‌ efforts by Republicans to rein in​ the administrative state with a new bill called the Sunset Act. This legislation, set⁢ to be introduced on Monday, aims to require ‌major rules to expire after a ‌decade unless approved by both⁣ chambers⁤ of Congress through a‌ joint ⁣resolution.

Major rules, as determined by the Office of‍ Management and Budget, are those ⁢with ⁢economic effects exceeding $100 ‍million. The Sunset Act is part of a broader GOP initiative to scale back the ​federal bureaucracy and⁤ administrative state, which has gained urgency in ⁤response ⁣to⁣ what Republicans view​ as excessive rulemaking by the Biden administration.

“The Biden administration has weaponized their administrative state using major⁢ rules which can languish on the books and⁣ potentially eat up billions⁤ of taxpayer dollars,” Emmer​ stated. “It’s‌ time to hold these agencies accountable and ensure that⁤ the American people, not bureaucrats in Washington, have​ their hands‌ on the wheel.”

Under the ‍legislation, federal agencies would ⁣be required to submit reports to Congress at least 180 days before a rule expires. Additionally, the‌ bill ⁢allows the president to issue executive orders exempting rules that are deemed necessary ‍for national security, the ‌enforcement ⁤of⁣ criminal law, or the health and safety of the country. However, ⁢if the president deems a rule necessary,⁣ Congress must approve it within 30⁣ days.

Conservative groups are expected ‍to support⁤ the ‌measure, with Heritage Action praising the move. Ryan Walker, ⁣Executive Vice President of Heritage Action, emphasized the need for congressional ​approval ⁢of​ rules ⁤that impact taxpayers and citizens’ daily lives.

This latest Republican effort to rein ‌in the ‍administrative state follows the introduction of ‍the ​Regulations from the ‌Executive ​In Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act ​by Rep. Kat Cammack (R-FL) last year. The REINS ⁣Act focuses on rulemaking⁤ from ​the executive ​branch and requires approval from the House and Senate for every‍ new major rule proposed by federal agencies.

Cammack​ argues that her bill is crucial ⁣in ‍restoring‌ Congress’ ⁣authority to legislate​ proposed rules​ and regulations that ​bring about significant changes. She highlights the ​importance of ⁢this ​power‍ shift, ​particularly in response to the ​”hyperpartisan” rulemaking by the Biden administration.

One⁣ example of a regulation that could ‌be affected by these efforts is​ the Labor Department’s rule‌ allowing retirement plan⁤ managers‌ to ‍consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors ⁤when ‍making⁢ investments. While the rule permits fiduciaries⁣ to weigh ESG factors, it ⁢is not mandatory for U.S. retirement accounts.

Congressional Republicans attempted to ⁢override the ESG rule and garnered some Democratic support.‌ However, President Joe Biden vetoed the override, and there was insufficient‍ backing in Congress to overturn ​his decision, resulting in the rule moving forward.

These‍ legislative endeavors reflect the ongoing battle between Republicans and the⁣ Biden administration over the extent of federal⁢ regulations and the power of the administrative state.

What are the ⁤potential risks and benefits of the Sunset Act in ​terms of protecting public health, safety, and the environment?

Cessary ⁣for the protection of health,‌ safety,‍ or national security. ‍However, these ​exemptions would only remain⁢ in effect for a limited time and would require approval from both‍ chambers of Congress to ​become permanent.

The Sunset⁢ Act is seen‍ as a ⁤crucial step in ‍reining in the power of the administrative ​state. In ​recent years, there has been ⁤growing concern among ​conservatives that the federal bureaucracy has ⁤become too powerful and unaccountable. By requiring⁣ major ⁤rules to⁤ expire after​ a decade,​ the legislation aims to create a system of regular review and‍ assessment of the necessity and effectiveness‍ of these ⁤rules.

Supporters of the bill argue that it⁣ will help to address regulatory overreach and ensure that rules⁢ imposed by⁤ federal ⁣agencies are truly necessary and serve the best ‌interests of the ‍American people. They believe that‍ excessive rulemaking can⁣ stifle innovation, hinder economic growth, and burden ⁤businesses with unnecessary compliance costs.

However, critics ​of the Sunset‌ Act argue⁢ that it ‌could potentially disrupt important regulations that‌ are ‌vital for protecting public health, safety, and⁢ the ⁣environment. They⁢ worry that ‌rules that have been ⁢thoroughly vetted and implemented after careful ‌consideration may be at ‌risk​ of expiring, leaving gaps‍ in‌ oversight and protection.

The bill is expected⁤ to face ‍opposition from Democrats, who currently hold the majority in both ⁢the House and the Senate. They have generally been more ⁢supportive of ⁢regulatory actions and believe that they‍ play a crucial role in protecting the rights and well-being of the American people.

Nevertheless, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer⁢ is determined to ⁣push forward with‍ the Sunset Act⁤ and believes that it is a necessary step in ensuring that the ⁤American people have a say‍ in the rulemaking process. ‌He argues that this legislation will hold federal​ agencies accountable ⁣and prevent them from imposing burdensome regulations without‌ sufficient ⁢justification.

The introduction of ‌the Sunset‌ Act is just one of the ways in which ⁢Republicans are seeking to rein in the‍ administrative state. They have ‌also proposed other ⁢reforms, such as​ requiring Congressional ⁢approval for major rules ⁣and implementing stricter cost-benefit analysis requirements for ‌new regulations.

As the⁤ discussion around the Sunset Act⁣ unfolds, it ‍is clear that the battle between those who advocate for a smaller, less intrusive government and those who believe in the importance of regulatory actions will continue. The American people and the future of​ the ​administrative state hang ‍in the balance, with the outcome‍ of⁢ these legislative efforts likely to shape the ⁣country’s regulatory landscape for years​ to come.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker