Eric Swalwell used campaign funds once more, this time to purchase Super Bowl tickets
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) Spends $22,000 in Campaign Donations on Super Bowl Tickets
Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA), known for his personal indulgences funded by campaign money, made headlines when it was revealed that he spent $22,000 from his campaign donations on tickets to this year’s Super Bowl. As a devoted San Francisco 49ers fan, Swalwell attended the game on Feb. 11 at the Las Vegas stadium, raising questions about how he could afford such expensive tickets given his financial history.
According to Federal Election Commission records, Swalwell’s campaign justified the ticket expenses as a fundraising cost for the San Francisco 49ers game. The committee’s pre-primary filing to the FEC, obtained by Fox News, confirmed the $22,000 expenditure on Super Bowl tickets.
In addition to the ticket purchases, Swalwell’s financial report revealed further spending. He used over $100 at Allegiant Stadium, where the 49ers played against the Kansas City Chiefs, and nearly $3,000 at a restaurant called Alexxa’s Las Vegas. The report also showed a $30,900 expenditure labeled “Event Tickets for Fundraising Event,” which appears to have been spent at the Las Vegas Raiders stadium.
During the Super Bowl, Swalwell took the opportunity to engage in some campaigning by meeting with members of the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association, as stated on the group’s website.
This is not the first time Swalwell has used campaign funds for personal luxuries. In December, he spent $1,560 at Aramark at the Lincoln Financial Field, where the Philadelphia Eagles played against the 49ers. Additionally, at the end of last year, he incurred $90,000 in travel expenses, including a $1,700 stay at a five-star hotel in Dubai, according to Fox News.
Furthermore, Swalwell previously used campaign money to cover approximately $17,000 in child care expenses after the 2022 election cycle, which is beyond the permissible period for candidates to utilize campaign funds for such purposes.
The Federal Election Commission addressed Swalwell’s use of campaign funds, stating, “The Act and Commission regulations define ‘personal use’ as the use of campaign funds ‘to fulfill any commitment, obligation, or expense of a person that would exist irrespective of the candidate’s election campaign’ or duties as a federal officeholder.”
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
Why is it important for politicians to use their personal funds for personal indulgences rather than campaign funds?
Ssion (FEC) records, Swalwell’s campaign committee made a payment of $22,000 to a hospitality company for “event tickets” on January 31, just days before the big game. This raised eyebrows among watchdog groups and critics, who argue that campaign funds should be used solely for political purposes, not for personal enjoyment or luxury items.
Swalwell’s extravagant spending habits have come under scrutiny in the past. In 2017, it was revealed that he had used campaign funds for luxury hotel stays and expensive meals while on official business trips. The FEC determined that these expenses were not directly related to his campaign and warned Swalwell to reimburse his campaign committee.
The latest incident involving Swalwell’s use of campaign funds for Super Bowl tickets raises serious ethical concerns. It is not surprising that politicians, like Swalwell, would want to support their favorite sports teams and attend major events. However, it is essential that they do so with their personal funds and not with money that is meant to finance their political campaigns.
Campaign donations are given by supporters who trust that their contributions will be used responsibly and in the best interest of the campaign. When a politician uses these funds for personal enjoyment, it compromises the trust of their donors and undermines the integrity of the electoral process. Swalwell, as a public servant, has a responsibility to be transparent and accountable when it comes to handling campaign funds.
The argument could be made that attending the Super Bowl could provide Swalwell with networking opportunities or help establish relationships with potential donors. However, this justification is feeble at best. There are numerous other ways to connect with supporters and build relationships without resorting to lavish personal indulgences.
Critics have pointed out that Swalwell’s financial history does not align with his ability to afford such expensive tickets. Reports indicate that he has struggled with significant financial debt, including defaulting on student loans and facing multiple lawsuits. This raises questions about whether he is using campaign funds as a means to subsidize his personal lifestyle, rather than for legitimate campaign purposes.
In response to the controversy, Swalwell’s office released a statement claiming that the Super Bowl tickets were purchased as part of a fundraising event. However, no evidence has been provided to support this claim, and it is difficult to believe that the expenditure was solely for campaign-related purposes.
This incident serves as a reminder that there is a dire need for stronger regulations and oversight regarding the use of campaign funds. The FEC should closely monitor how candidates are spending their donations, and penalties should be enforced for those who misuse their funds for personal gain.
In conclusion, Swalwell’s use of campaign funds to finance his Super Bowl tickets is highly questionable and raises serious ethical concerns. Campaign funds should be used exclusively for political purposes, and any other use compromises the integrity of the electoral process. This incident underscores the need for stricter regulations and enforcement to ensure that campaign funds are used responsibly and transparently. Voters deserve to know that their donations are being used in a manner that aligns with the candidates’ stated goals and commitments.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...