Email reveals Weiss breached DOJ policy by sending letters to protect Garland.
The Department of Justice’s Disregard for Policy Raises Questions
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has come under scrutiny for its handling of congressional inquiries regarding the Hunter Biden investigation. According to an email obtained by The Federalist, Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss was directed not to respond to these inquiries, as it was the responsibility of the DOJ’s Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA) to do so.
However, Weiss went against this directive and sent a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, falsely claiming that he had “ultimate authority” over the investigation. This blatant disregard for DOJ policy suggests that both Attorney General Merrick Garland and Weiss intended to obscure the truth about Weiss’s involvement in the case.
The email revealing the DOJ’s policy was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by the Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project. It confirms that only the OLA is authorized to respond to requests from the legislative branch.
Questionable Actions and Violations
This violation of policy is not an isolated incident. In May 2022, Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson wrote to Weiss inquiring about various aspects of the Hunter Biden investigation. Despite being instructed to forward the correspondence to the OLA, Weiss failed to do so.
After the senators sent a follow-up email requesting a response, Weiss’s office sought clarification from the DOJ. The subsequent email exchange explicitly stated that only the OLA could respond on behalf of the department.
Despite this clear instruction, Weiss continued to act independently. The OLA eventually responded to Grassley and Johnson’s letter, but Weiss himself sent a letter to the senators, as well as to Garland and FBI Director Christopher Wray, further muddying the waters.
Unusual Responses and Misleading Statements
When House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan questioned Garland about the removal of IRS whistleblowers from the Hunter Biden investigation, Weiss once again stepped in to respond on behalf of the attorney general. This raised eyebrows, as it was a departure from DOJ policy.
Jordan expressed his concerns about Weiss’s response and requested information about the drafting and dispatching of the letter. It is now evident that Weiss’s actions were in violation of the DOJ’s policy, which only authorized the OLA to handle legislative inquiries.
The content of Weiss’s letter also sheds light on the DOJ’s motives. It appears that Garland needed Weiss to confirm his previous statement to Grassley during a hearing, where he claimed that Weiss had full authority over the investigation. Weiss’s assertion in the letter seemed to support Garland’s testimony.
Contradictions and Cover-ups
However, subsequent revelations from the IRS whistleblower contradicted Weiss’s earlier claims. Forced to address this inconsistency, Weiss penned a follow-up letter to Jordan, where he backtracked on his previous statement of having “ultimate authority.” Instead, he stated that he had only been “assured” that he would be granted authority if necessary.
This contradiction raises further questions about the DOJ’s involvement in these letters. It is clear that Weiss’s actions were orchestrated by the department, as he would have been in violation of policy otherwise.
The DOJ has yet to respond to inquiries about Weiss’s violation of policy. This disregard for established procedures and the apparent attempts to obfuscate the truth only deepen the concerns surrounding the Hunter Biden investigation.
What policy did David Weiss disregard by handling the inquiries instead of Ssley and Johnson, and why did he choose to do so?
Ssley and Johnson, confirming that it was their responsibility to handle the inquiries. This raises serious questions about why Weiss chose to disregard the policy and why he falsely claimed to have authority over the investigation.
The Need for Accountability
The DOJ’s disregard for its own policies raises significant concerns about transparency and accountability within the department. It is essential that the American public can trust that their government is acting in accordance with established rules and regulations.
By ignoring the established protocol for responding to congressional inquiries, Weiss and potentially others within the DOJ have created an environment of confusion and mistrust. This lack of transparency undermines the integrity of the investigation and casts doubt on the motivations behind Weiss’s actions.
It is also essential to examine the role of Attorney General Merrick Garland in this matter. As the head of the DOJ, Garland bears responsibility for ensuring that department policies are followed and that the actions of its employees are in line with the law. If Weiss’s actions were contrary to established policies, it is crucial that Garland address this misconduct and take appropriate disciplinary action.
The Importance of the Hunter Biden Investigation
The Hunter Biden investigation has been a subject of great interest and controversy. The American people deserve to know the truth about any potential wrongdoing involving the son of a sitting president.
By disregarding policy and potentially seeking to obscure the truth, the DOJ undermines the legitimacy of the investigation. It is imperative that the department conducts this investigation with the utmost integrity, ensuring that all evidence is thoroughly examined and that any potential violations of the law are held accountable.
Conclusion
The Department of Justice’s disregard for its own policy regarding congressional inquiries raises serious questions about transparency, accountability, and the integrity of the Hunter Biden investigation. It is imperative that Attorney General Merrick Garland address the misconduct of U.S. Attorney David Weiss and take appropriate disciplinary action.
The American public deserves to know that their government is acting in accordance with established rules and regulations. The DOJ must prioritize transparency and uphold the principles of justice for the benefit of the American people. Only by holding individuals accountable and ensuring the investigation is conducted with integrity can the DOJ regain the public’s trust.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...