FBI’s False Claims Leaked to NYT and Shared with Weiss

The FBI’s‍ Lies and The New York ‌Times

Emails​ obtained by the Heritage Foundation following a ⁤Freedom of ⁣Information Act (FOIA)⁢ lawsuit,​ and​ shared ‍exclusively with The Federalist, reveal a shocking ‍revelation about the origins ‌of damning evidence implicating Hunter⁢ and Joe Biden in a bribery⁢ scandal. It turns ⁢out that lies leaked to The New ‌York Times were fed to ​Delaware U.S.​ Attorney David ​Weiss.

As I previously⁢ detailed, The New York Times⁤ reported these lies in its ⁤Dec. 11, 2020, article, “Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of Hunter Biden.” The Times’ reporting was filled with falsehoods and deceptive narratives, but at the time, Americans were unaware of ⁤the truth.

However, earlier‌ this year, thanks to “whistleblower revelations and ⁤statements by former Attorney General William⁤ Barr,” the‍ country learned that the Times’ claims were false.‌ A separate‍ investigation had uncovered evidence implicating​ Hunter and Joe Biden in a bribery scandal.

Now, the recently released FOIA-produced emails shed even more light on the situation. They reveal that the⁢ FBI lies, which were laundered through The New York Times, were directly fed to Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss.

The Revealing Emails

The never-before-seen ‌emails, provided by the ⁢Department of Justice ‌to the​ Heritage Foundation, show an⁣ email thread that exposes how The ⁢New York Times ⁢story ended ‌up in Weiss’s hands.

“Ladies,⁢ here you‍ have attached‍ the NYT’s story ‘Material from Giuliani Spurred a Separate Justice Depart. Pursuit of ⁣Hunter ‌Biden’ which posted a bit‌ ago.⁣ Link here,” a Dec. ‌11, 2020, 6:44 p.m. email from ⁣the FBI‌ Office of Public ‌Affairs’ National Press Office read.

The names of the ‌email recipients were redacted, but it ​is clear that the National ​Press Office ⁤forwarded the Times’ article to the Pittsburgh FBI‌ office and the Baltimore FBI⁣ office, which provided⁢ support ⁤for the Delaware U.S. attorney’s office.

Within hours, the false ​narrative about evidence of Biden family​ corruption ‍had spread through‍ various ‌FBI agents ‍and eventually reached Weiss and his team. The Times article was even forwarded to another member of the Delaware U.S. attorney’s⁣ office.

The Background and More Questions

Contrary to the Times’ reporting,‍ the evidence implicating the ‌Bidens did ​not come⁢ from ‍Giuliani. ⁤It ‍originated​ from a highly credible FBI confidential human source (CHS). The FD-1023 document, which memorialized the CHS’s reporting, contained explosive​ revelations about the​ Bidens’ involvement ‌in a bribery ​scheme.

• Pojarskii ⁤claimed Hunter Biden was paid to‍ serve on Burisma’s board‍ of directors to “protect‍ us, through⁤ his dad, ‌from ‌all​ kinds of ⁢problems.”
• Ukrainian prosecutor⁢ Viktor Shokin was investigating Burisma, ⁤but Zlochevsky told the⁣ CHS that “Hunter‍ will take care of all of those issues through his dad.”
• Zlochevsky‌ told the CHS ⁢he had been coerced to ‌pay bribes of $5 million each to Hunter ⁣Biden and Joe Biden.
• After Trump’s election ‍in 2016,⁣ Zlochevsky‌ expressed dissatisfaction ‌with Trump’s victory, but then told⁢ the ​CHS that “Shokin had already been fired, and no investigation was currently​ going on.”
• Zlochevsky​ told the CHS he had ‍17 ‍recordings ⁣of the Bidens but had never paid Joe Biden ‌directly.
• The “Big ‌Guy” moniker ​was used to refer to Joe Biden — a ⁤significant detail⁤ because the⁢ CHS interview predated the ⁤public release of material contained on Hunter Biden’s laptop, including information that established the “Big Guy” was⁤ one ⁢of Joe Biden’s nicknames.
• Burisma discussed purchasing a U.S.-based oil and gas company for ⁤approximately $20-$30 million.

Now, the question arises: Who in ⁣Delaware knew⁣ about the FD-1023 and‍ its sourcing to⁤ a highly credible CHS?⁤ Did Weiss and his⁢ team have knowledge of ‌this information?​ The emails​ don’t provide a clear‍ answer, but they do confirm that Weiss and‍ his top deputies were fed The New York Times’ false reporting.

These ⁢revelations raise⁤ even more questions about the integrity of the investigation and the ⁣actions of those involved. It ‌is crucial to determine⁤ who within ‍the FBI‍ fed⁣ the‍ Times the‌ lies and whether Weiss was aware of the ⁤truth.