‘Facebook Files’ Part 4: FBI’s Censorship Liaison May Have Committed Perjury

Top FBI Agent⁣ May Have Committed Perjury⁢ in Censorship Case

Part four of the “Facebook Files” ‍published by Rep. Jim Jordan on Monday reveals a stunning revelation. FBI Special Agent Elvis Chan, who plays a crucial role in coordinating censorship strategy with Silicon Valley tech companies, may have lied⁤ under ‍oath ⁢during‌ his November testimony. According⁤ to internal ⁤Facebook documents,⁤ Chan participated in a secret follow-up call with Facebook‌ employees about the ‍authenticity of Hunter Biden’s infamous​ laptop, contradicting his previous statement that he‌ was only ⁢aware of​ one meeting. This raises serious questions about the FBI’s role in suppressing the Hunter Biden laptop story.

In his November deposition, Chan admitted⁤ to a meeting with Facebook officials regarding the first Hunter Biden laptop story published by the New‌ York Post. However, internal Facebook⁣ records contradict his claim ⁣of only one meeting.‍ Laura‍ Dehmlow, the FBI’s section ‍chief of the Foreign Influence Task‌ Force, offered “no comment” when Facebook‍ asked about ‍the ‍laptop’s authenticity. Facebook then‍ announced it was⁣ reducing⁢ the distribution of the story ⁢until a third-party fact check was completed.

Dehmlow​ initially acknowledged‍ the laptop’s authenticity⁢ in a meeting with Twitter, but⁢ later ⁣changed the FBI’s response to “no comment” when other companies like ‌Facebook ‍inquired. This contradicts IRS whistleblowers who revealed⁣ that the FBI had confirmed the laptop’s authenticity as early as November 2019. Chan’s testimony and the internal Facebook documents raise serious doubts about the‌ FBI’s integrity and its role in suppressing information.

Furthermore,⁣ another Facebook⁤ employee⁣ recalled a follow-up discussion with Chan the day after the meeting, where they asked for updates on the legitimacy status of Hunter Biden’s laptop. While Chan claimed ⁤to have no internal knowledge of the FBI’s investigation,‌ Facebook records indicate that he was ⁢up to⁤ speed on the matter within the FBI. These inconsistencies further cast doubt on the FBI’s transparency and credibility.

The “Facebook Files” have previously exposed ‍collusion between Facebook and Biden White House officials​ to censor information ⁤about​ Covid-19, including true content.‌ The Biden ⁢administration pressured Facebook to remove humorous or ⁤satirical content that suggested the vaccine wasn’t safe, even if it was true. These⁢ revelations raise ⁤concerns about the government’s⁣ influence on​ social media platforms and the suppression of ⁢free speech.

[READ:[READ:‘Facebook Files’ 2.0⁢ Reveal White House Pressured Facebook To Censor ‘True’ Content]

In‍ July,⁣ Chief Judge Terry Doughty of the ⁢Western District of⁢ Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction in Missouri v. Biden, prohibiting administration officials from collaborating with tech companies ⁣to censor dissenting speech on social media platforms. However, the⁢ 5th Circuit Court ‍of Appeals later issued a stay on the injunction, allowing federal officials to continue‌ working with tech companies to censor Americans⁣ online. This ongoing battle highlights the ⁤importance of protecting free speech in⁢ the digital age.