FBI questioned Priest, Choir Director in investigation of Traditional Catholics, per House Report
Federal Agents Investigate Radical-Traditional Catholics as Potential Domestic Terrorists
Federal agents have recently interviewed a priest and a choir director as part of an investigation into a group known as Radical-Traditional Catholics. This investigation, conducted by the House Weaponization Committee, aims to determine if these individuals pose a threat as potential domestic terrorists.
The House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government initiated this investigation after a former FBI agent named Kyle Seraphin leaked an internal memo from the bureau’s Richmond Field Office. The memo portrayed certain “radical-traditionalist Catholics” as violent extremists and suggested infiltrating Catholic churches as a means of mitigating this perceived threat.
In response to these revelations, the committee expressed concern over the violation of Americans’ civil liberties and constitutional rights by an overzealous law enforcement agency. Whistleblower disclosures in the report revealed that the FBI interviewed a priest and choir director from The Society of Saint Pius (SSPX), an international priestly society associated with a Catholic church in Richmond, Virginia.
The report further highlighted that the FBI’s interview with the clergy was used to gather information on parishioners under investigation, which lawmakers argue infringes upon the religious liberties of millions of Catholic Americans. Although the contents of these interviews remain undisclosed, the committee noted that they took place around the same time the memo was being drafted.
Additionally, the report claimed that the FBI relied on an undercover agent and sought to establish sources within the Catholic clergy and church leadership. The memo’s foundation was based on a single investigation into the Richmond Field Office’s jurisdiction, which involved an individual who identified as a “radical-traditionalist Catholic.”
Lawmakers discovered that FBI employees involved in preparing, editing, or reviewing the memo were unable to define the term “Radical-Traditional Catholic.” The concept was sourced from left-wing publications such as the Southern Poverty Law Center, Salon, and The Atlantic.
According to the committee’s report, the FBI’s Richmond Special Agent in Charge, Stanley Meador, confirmed that the analysts who co-authored the memo had been with the bureau for approximately 20 years. The report concluded that the FBI had misused its counterterrorism tools to target Catholic Americans as potential domestic terrorists.
Following the leak of the memo, the FBI swiftly went into damage control mode and removed the anti-Catholic document from its system. The bureau stated that it would never initiate investigations solely based on First Amendment protected activity.
However, the committee argued that the FBI’s agency-wide memo contradicted this claim and found no legitimate basis for federal law enforcement to involve itself in Catholic places of worship.
What steps can the House Weaponization Committee take to investigate the extent of the threat posed by Radical-Traditional Catholics without infringing on the rights of American citizens?
Peter and Paul, a traditionalist Catholic group, based on their alleged association with Radical-Traditional Catholics. The committee viewed this as a potential violation of religious freedom and an infringement on the rights of American citizens.
The House Weaponization Committee aims to investigate the extent to which Radical-Traditional Catholics pose a threat as potential domestic terrorists. This term, coined by the leaked memo, refers to Catholics who hold strong traditionalist views and may harbor extremist ideologies. While the committee understands the importance of ensuring national security, it also recognizes the need to protect individual rights and civil liberties.
Radical-Traditional Catholics are not a monolithic group, and it is important to make that distinction. Many Catholics follow traditional practices and beliefs without advocating or engaging in violence. It is crucial to avoid painting an entire community with a broad brush based on the actions of a few individuals.
This investigation raises questions about the role of law enforcement agencies and their methods of assessing potential threats. While the protection of national security is paramount, it is equally important to ensure that the rights of individuals and communities are not unjustly violated. The House Judiciary Committee and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government have a responsibility to examine the actions of the FBI and any potential overreach on their part.
Religious freedom and the right to practice one’s faith without fear of unwarranted scrutiny should be protected. The potential infiltration of Catholic churches, as suggested in the leaked memo, is concerning and may lead to a breach of trust within religious communities. It is vital for law enforcement agencies to approach investigations of any religious group with caution and sensitivity, ensuring that the rights of individuals are safeguarded throughout the process.
It is important to strike a balance between national security and the protection of individual rights. While it is necessary to investigate potential threats, it is equally crucial to respect the rights and freedoms of all citizens, regardless of their religious beliefs. In this case, it is imperative that the House Weaponization Committee conducts a thorough and fair investigation, ensuring that any potential violations of civil liberties are addressed and rectified.
In conclusion, the investigation into Radical-Traditional Catholics as potential domestic terrorists raises significant concerns regarding the balance between national security and individual rights. The leaked memo and subsequent actions by law enforcement agencies have sparked a necessary conversation about the methods used to assess potential threats and the potential violations of civil liberties. It is crucial for the House Weaponization Committee to address these concerns and ensure that a fair and just investigation is conducted, ultimately protecting the rights and freedoms of all American citizens.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
