FBI links Jan 6 bomber to ex-gov official’s metro card, but blocks interview, says ex-agent

A Former FBI Agent Reveals Shocking Details About the January 6 Pipe Bombs

In ‍a stunning revelation, a former FBI agent has come forward with information about the pipe bombs planted at the Democrat National Committee ⁣and the Republican National⁣ Committee during​ the January 6 protests. According to the agent, the Bureau quickly identified a ‍person of interest through a Metro fare‍ card and license plate, but inexplicably‌ halted​ the‌ investigation and⁣ prevented​ interviews with the suspect.

This new allegation raises serious questions ⁣about the pipe ⁢bombs, which have been largely ignored by Democrats and authorities since the⁤ events ⁣of January 6. The bombs ⁤were by far the ⁣most violent aspect of the⁢ protests, yet little attention ⁢has been given to them.

The Investigation Unveiled

Kyle Seraphin, a former FBI agent who led surveillance teams, has shed light on the⁤ Bureau’s handling of the case. He ⁢revealed that shortly after January 6, a counterintelligence ⁢team briefed him on their surveillance target. They had⁣ tracked the person⁣ responsible for planting the bombs⁤ through security ​footage and identified the fare card used.

Using the‍ fare card, they were able to determine that the suspect⁤ had disembarked at a Metro stop in Northern Virginia. Surveillance footage showed the⁢ person entering a⁣ car, and both the car and the fare card were registered to the same individual – a retired Air Force chief master sergeant working as a contractor with a security clearance.

Seraphin and his team were assigned to stake out the suspect’s row house for several days. However, their efforts were abruptly halted by the FBI, who denied their request to interview the person⁤ of interest. Instead,⁤ they were redirected⁤ to investigate low-priority⁤ leads involving ⁢minor participants in the January 6 events.

The‌ Shocking Negligence

Seraphin expressed his disbelief at the⁤ Bureau’s handling of the case, ‌stating, “Allegedly someone threw bombs around the Capitol which could have killed congressmen ⁣or a busload of nuns or anything, and ⁣the answer is you can’t ⁢follow this guy ​around?” He criticized the‌ FBI’s focus on minor wrongdoings while neglecting a highly specific lead that could have led them ⁤to the suspect.

He also revealed that the counterintelligence‍ division, responsible for the case,⁢ lacked the expertise ⁢of “manhunters” who specialize in apprehending individuals and building ⁤prosecutable cases. This lack of experience may have contributed to the mishandling of the investigation.

The FBI’s Competence Questioned

Seraphin emphasized that it was not surprising that the FBI had traced the bomber, as ‌their capabilities are extensive. He cited previous cases, ⁤such as the World Trade Center bombing in⁤ 1993, where the Bureau successfully tracked down the⁤ perpetrators. He questioned why they couldn’t find ⁢any leads ⁢on‌ a non-detonated bomb.

Furthermore, the FBI’s reluctance to release clear images of the‍ bomber, despite extensive security camera​ coverage on Capitol ⁤Hill, has ⁣raised ⁣suspicions. The excuse that a corrupted database prevented them from identifying the suspect through ‌cell phone records seems dubious.

A Cover-Up?

The Washington Times first reported these allegations in May 2023, ⁣but the story received little attention.⁣ However, during an interview with the House Judiciary Committee,‍ former FBI official Steve D’Antuono ⁢seemed to confirm the existence of the‍ Metro card lead. He failed to explain why it‍ ultimately led to nothing.

When questioned about the pipe bombs, D’Antuono’s lack of knowledge about the investigation was evident. This contradicted his earlier claim that individuals ‌like Seraphin, who were not case agents, would not have accurate⁢ information.

The Unanswered Questions

Many‍ unanswered questions surround the pipe⁤ bombs and the FBI’s handling of the case. The officers’ lack of urgency when the bombs were pointed out outside the DNC headquarters, as captured in a video, raises suspicions about their prior knowledge. Additionally, the omission of the pipe bombs by Democrats, ‌who‌ seek to portray January 6⁣ as a violent insurrection, is highly questionable.

As more ⁢details emerge, it becomes increasingly clear that there may be a cover-up surrounding the pipe bombs and their significance in the events of January 6. The truth behind this disturbing incident must be exposed,‌ regardless of the ⁢political implications.

What concerns does the⁢ lack of⁣ attention given to the pipe bombs ⁤raise about⁢ bias and selective investigations?

⁤ Vestigation and the failure to ‌apprehend the suspect.

The‌ Blowback

Since its⁤ initial publication, Seraphin’s⁣ revelation ​has sparked outrage⁢ and demands for ⁤answers. Many are questioning why⁣ the ⁣investigation into the ‍pipe bombs was seemingly ⁤halted, and why the suspect was not properly pursued or interviewed. The fact‌ that this crucial aspect of the January 6 events has been largely⁢ ignored by ⁤Democrats and authorities is troubling, as ⁤it raises concerns about bias​ and selective ⁢investigations.

Furthermore, the lack of ‍attention given​ to the ​pipe bombs is in stark contrast to the media coverage and​ the subsequent investigations into⁤ other aspects of the January 6 protests. While the⁤ event itself was undoubtedly shocking and unacceptable, it‍ is crucial that all facets of the incident are thoroughly ⁣examined and pursued, including⁤ the planting ‌of​ the pipe bombs.

Conclusion

The revelation by former FBI⁤ agent Kyle Seraphin regarding the mishandling of the investigation ⁣into the January 6⁣ pipe bombs raises serious questions ‌about the objectivity and effectiveness of law ​enforcement agencies. The fact that a highly specific lead, involving a person of interest identified through surveillance footage and ⁢fare⁤ card records, was ignored and‌ sidelined is ⁢deeply concerning.

Given the violence and potential harm that could have resulted from the pipe bombs, ⁢it is crucial ​that a thorough investigation is conducted and that all responsible ⁣parties are held accountable. It is imperative‌ that law ​enforcement agencies prioritize the safety and security of the public​ and take all necessary steps to⁣ prevent ⁤and‌ address acts of terrorism and ​violence.

The handling ⁣of the⁤ January 6 pipe bombs by the FBI calls for a transparent⁤ review of their procedures and protocols. The American public deserves to have confidence in their law enforcement agencies and trust that they will diligently pursue ‍all leads‌ and ensure⁣ justice is served.

Only through a fair and comprehensive investigation can we hope to‍ uncover the truth about what happened‌ on January 6 and prevent similar incidents in the future. The negligence and mishandling of the pipe bomb case should serve as ​a wake-up call for authorities⁤ to prioritize⁣ the safety and well-being of the American people ​above all else.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases