Federal Appeals Court Suspends Judge Appointed by Reagan in Unusual Move
Aging Federal Appeals Court Judge Suspended Amid Concerns About Competency
A 96-year-old federal appeals court judge, appointed to the bench by former President Ronald Reagan, has been suspended in a rare move after her colleagues expressed concerns about her competency.
Judge Pauline Newman, who has served with distinction for almost four decades, has been under investigation by her fellow jurists on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. They have raised doubts about her ability to perform her duties.
BREAKING: Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman was suspended from hearing any cases for 1 year after the court’s judges said their 96-year-old colleague derailed an investigation into whether she is mentally fit to serve by not agreeing to medical tests. https://t.co/9ZiTceUkMT pic.twitter.com/3BpqHqh5YU
— Law360 (@Law360) September 20, 2023
However, Judge Newman has refused to cooperate with the probe into her health, according to a 73-page document posted online. She allegedly declined to visit a doctor and undergo cognitive testing to prove her fitness to serve.
A summary of the suspension states that mounting evidence raised doubts about Judge Newman’s ability to perform her duties. Colleagues attempted to discuss her fitness with her, but she either refused to speak to them or quickly terminated the conversation.
During the investigation, 20 of her colleagues were interviewed, and their accounts, along with numerous emails from Judge Newman, provided overwhelming evidence of potential mental problems, including memory loss, lack of comprehension, confusion, and an inability to perform basic tasks.
Witnesses have observed Judge Newman struggling with basic tasks, often becoming frustrated, agitated, belligerent, and hostile.
Despite her exemplary career, Judge Newman’s peers expressed regret over her suspension. She has defended her cognitive abilities and filed a lawsuit to reverse the decision.
For now, she is barred from taking on new cases until she agrees to be evaluated and is deemed fit to serve.
This suspension comes at a time when there is a larger conversation about age and public service, with concerns raised about President Joe Biden’s age and the impending retirement of Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein.
Source: The Western Journal
What broader discussion has been prompted by the unusual action taken against Judge Newman?
Olleague ”appears to have experienced a serious decline in her basic cognitive and communication skills.” https://t.co/P74yjNDY2N
— Ryan Davis (@rdavis__) January 3, 2022
The suspension of Judge Newman from hearing any cases for one year comes after her colleagues expressed concerns about her declining cognitive and communication skills. This unusual action taken against a federal appeals court judge has prompted a broader discussion about aging judges and their competency.
Judge Pauline Newman’s career has spanned a remarkable length of almost four decades, during which she has served with distinction on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Appointed by former President Ronald Reagan, she has contributed significantly to the legal landscape of the United States.
However, as age catches up with Judge Newman, concerns about her ability to perform her judicial duties have arisen. Fellow jurists on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have been engaged in an investigation into her competency. Their doubts regarding her cognitive and communication skills led to the decision to suspend her from hearing any cases for a year.
This suspension marks a significant moment in the discussion surrounding aging federal judges. While lifetime appointment is a cornerstone of the judicial system, it becomes challenging when judges reach an age where their competence might come into question. The case of Judge Newman brings to light the need for a careful evaluation of judges’ abilities as they age.
It is crucial to balance the respect for judges’ experience and knowledge with the necessity for them to perform their duties effectively. In this case, Judge Newman’s distinguished career should not overshadow the concerns expressed by her fellow jurists. Their decision to suspend her sends a message that competency should always be a priority in the judicial system.
Furthermore, this case also raises questions about the existing mechanisms in place to assess the competency of judges as they age. While there are systems in place to evaluate judges’ performance, they may not always be sufficient to identify cognitive decline. This incident emphasizes the need to review and improve these evaluation processes, ensuring that they are comprehensive and effective.
Ultimately, the suspension of Judge Pauline Newman serves as a reminder that the issue of aging judges and their competency is a complex and sensitive one. Balancing respect for judges’ experience with the need for effective performance is a challenge that must be addressed. The case of Judge Newman should prompt further discussions and actions to ensure the integrity and competence of the judiciary.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
