Federal Tech Arm Had Pattern Of ‘Gross Mismanagement’ Before ‘Equity’-Induced Cybersecurity Fiasco

The President Barack Obama created a program to bring Silicon Valley tech workers into the federal government to encourage innovation. Instead, it led to repeated rule violations, huge financial losses and retaliation against whistleblowers who brought attention to possible violations of the law.

The Daily Wire reported last Wednesday that the General Services Administration Inspector General (GSA) found that GSA’s disruptive tech unit, Technology Transformation Service (TTS), was not functioning as intended. Federal agencies were tricked to violate security standards by omitting facial recognition from software designed to lock up highly sensitive information — reasoning internally that such software was racist. The false representation by the company claimed that it had complied with security standards. It obtained $197 million partly on this basis. GSA claimed it is investigating disciplinary actions.

But a series of other government probes show that the team of highly-paid computer programmers at TTS — also known as 18F — has repeatedly put cybersecurity at risk for years. While the majority of staff are far-left partisans and support big government, they appear to believe that the rules that govern big government do not apply to their operations in cyberspace.

The IG issued an emergency alert in May 2016 regarding a “data breach,” Write that “Due to authorizations enabled by GSA 18F staff, over 100 GSA Google Drives were reportedly accessible by users both inside and outside of GSA during a five month period, potentially exposing sensitive content such as personally identifiable information and contractor proprietary information.” This breach was caused by a misconfiguration of OAuth and Slack, which were not supposed to be used.

The IG later stated that 18F waited for five days to notify management of the ongoing breach. After that, it falsely claimed that the sensitive information was safe.

“In response to our alert report, the 18F Executive Director [Aaron Snow] and Director of Infrastructure [Noah Kunin] co-authored a public blog post on May 13, 2016, stating, ‘We did a full investigation and to our knowledge no sensitive information was shared inappropriately.’ 18F also subsequently issued emails to external partner agencies stating that ‘this was not a hack or data breach in any way, and this misconfiguration did not cause any sensitive information to be shared inappropriately,'” The IG wrote.

But, a February 2017 IG report On “18F’s Information Technology Security Compliance” According to 18F, the claim was false. “GSA IT found that the vulnerability exposed content containing PII to unauthorized users. As of February 2, 2017, the 18F blog post had not been updated to reflect the results of GSA IT’s review,” It was.

According to the report, “18F routinely disregarded and circumvented fundamental security requirements related to both the acquisition of information technology and the operation of information systems.” 18F was allowed to do things it didn’t allow, so it decided to do them anyway. “pre-authorization,” It said. It also stated that its employees used private email accounts to access sensitive government business.

Kunin was fed up with the oversight of Information Systems Security Officers from the GSA (ISSO), whose job it is to secure federal data, so he created ISSO 18F. This was something he didn’t have the power to do, according to the IG.

Kunin — who later quit the government because of his hatred of Donald Trump — admitted to the IG that the unit was “definitely not compliant.” According to him, investigators had no idea he was a thief. “had no training on GSA IT policies,” However, the IG “found that he completed the mandatory training, received a copy of the IT Security Policy from GSA IT, and had frequent discussions with the Chief Information Security Officer.”

“We sought to determine the cause of 18F’s widespread violations of fundamental GSA information technology security requirements. We concluded that management failures in GSA IT and 18F caused the breakdown in compliance,” It wrote. “When we asked 18F Executive Director Snow why there was a breakdown in 18F’s information technology security policy compliance, he answered, ‘I honestly don’t know,'” It was.

Financial failures were also a part of the failures. 18F was not concerned about taxpayer money: 18F’s Director, Operations stated privately: “To be frank, there are some of us that don’t give rip about the losses,” The IG uncovered.

The IG discovered that in June 2017, “18F had a $31.66 million cumulative net loss from its launch in March 2014 through the third quarter of FY 2016” It hired 200 people anyway. It was partly due to the wildly inaccurate projections of its leaders. “For example, although 18F projected over $84 million in revenue for FY 2016, by the third quarter the actual revenue was less than $28 million,” It was.

The staff also spent a lot of time on self-promotional activities and vanity projects as well as social justice initiatives. “The OIG found that less than half of the 18F staff’s time was spent on projects that would recover FAS’s ASF investment in 18F,” It was referring to Federal Acquisition Service.

18F worked without a contract even though there were numerous warnings. In most cases, it incorrectly billed clients. The IG found that 18F had undercharged one client by $5.5million. The IG discovered that it did not keep billing records and spent almost $25 million without approval.

Thomas Sharpe was the GSA’s Commissioner for FAS and believed that the entire financing of the tech group was illegal. The Inspector General was notified. GSA’s own lawyers were also convinced that GSA was evading Congress’ intent regarding the tech shop. GSA was attempting to circumvent Congress’ intent according to one GSA lawyer. “an administrative repeal of prior legislation and a stealth re-creation of a service Congress specifically abolished via the GSA Modernization Act.”

In June 2017, the IG discovered that Obama’s GSA Administrator Deborah Turner Roth had been arrested. Retaliation Sharpe was fired for blowing off the whistle. The Office of Special Counsel responded to Sharpe’s whistleblower complaint in April 2017. Acceptance: “Many violations identified in the IG’s October 24, 2016 report are the result of gross mismanagement.”

“The legal foundation of TTS is legally permissible. However, [our own] report does identify problems with the implementation of the legal foundation that was provided by the Office of General Counsel, which resulted in a violation of 31 USC §1535 and of GSA policy as well as gross mismanagement,” The GSA continued.

But, not much seemed to be changing. They continued to work under the Trump administration, and even into the Biden administration. They were caught by the IG this month in a dangerous mistake. The unit claimed that federal agencies’ data was safe with its login software, but it actually violated standards by removing biometric requirements. “equity.” The deceit was a grave danger Nearly one million Online accounts

“From Federal Tech Arm Had Pattern Of ‘Gross Mismanagement’ Before ‘Equity’-Induced Cybersecurity Fiasco“

“The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author of the article and not necessarily shared or endorsed by Conservative News Daily”

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases