Fight escalates over calling illegal migrants ‘illegal’ – Washington Examiner
The debate over the term “illegal” in the context of immigration is intensifying in the United States. Despite 62% of survey respondents affirming “illegal immigrant” or “illegal alien” as the appropriate terms for unauthorized border crossers, there’s growing controversy emanating from a particular case in a North Carolina high school. A student, Christian McGhee, was suspended after questioning his teacher’s use of the word “alien” during a class, asking whether it referred to extraterrestrial beings or unauthorized immigrants needing green cards. This led to a chain of reactions where McGhee, accused of racism by the teacher, was eventually suspended, despite his expression that the situation was a misunderstanding. His situation drew the attention of the Immigration Reform Law Institute which has since filed a brief supporting him, citing how common the usage of terms like “illegal alien” remains in legal and governmental contexts. Their stance and advocacy efforts are ongoing as they attempt to clear McGhee’s record of the suspension, emphasizing how terms like “undocumented” and “non-citizen” are viewed as incorrect euphemisms in legal lexicons.
“Illegal” may soon be illegal if America’s liberal immigration advocates get their way.
While 62% recently agreed in a survey that the proper term for unauthorized border crossers is “illegal immigrant” or “illegal alien,” a fight over a teenager’s innocent use of the phrase in a North Carolina high school in April is drawing major attention from key legal groups.
The latest to join was the Washington-based Immigration Reform Law Institute, which asked in a message to Secrets, “Is saying ‘illegal alien’ now forbidden?” The group that advocates strong border enforcement on Wednesday filed a brief in support of 16-year-old Christian McGhee.
At issue was his request to his teacher about her use of the word “alien” in a vocabulary quiz. He asked if the teacher meant “space aliens or illegal aliens who need green cards.”
A nearby Hispanic and friend of McGhee pretended to be offended. The teacher later accused McGhee of racism, and despite his mother’s plea to sort out the misunderstanding, he was suspended for three days. The trauma of the case forced him to be home-schooled for the rest of the spring.
In its filing, IRLI provided documents on how common the phrases “illegal,” “illegal alien,” and others are used in law and Congress to describe border crossers.
The group cited the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, for example, that said, “There is some confusion — not necessarily in this case but generally — regarding the proper term for non-citizens who are in the United States unlawfully. The leading legal lexicographer offers the following compelling explanation: “The usual and preferable term in [American English] is illegal alien. The other forms have arisen as needless euphemisms, and should be avoided as near-gobbledygook.”
The group, which is helping to have the teenager’s record cleaned of the suspension, also gave other examples of how terms “undocumented” and “non-citizen” are incorrect.
BREAKING 🚨🚨🚨 We have filed a lawsuit against a North Carolina school board on behalf of Christian McGhee, a 16-year-old student whose question about the word “aliens” in class led to a harsh suspension & false accusations of racism by his own school.
We proudly stand beside… pic.twitter.com/GvCB5H0wlm
— Liberty Justice Center (@LJCenter) May 7, 2024
“Such anodyne terms may seem harmless, but their use creates both confusion in the legal system and the implication that violating U.S. immigration law is not a serious action with a serious consequence. Use of proper legal terms is essential to the administration of immigration law in the United States,” said its 19-page court filing.
It added, “To be clear, no human being is illegal. To identify someone as an ‘illegal alien’ does not banish that person from the human race; it simply identifies the individual’s immigration status. There is nothing insulting or dehumanizing about using the term alien to indicate that an individual is a non-citizen.”
SEE THE LATEST POLITICAL NEWS AND BUZZ FROM WASHINGTON SECRETS
At IRLI, officials said the debate over the word is too political. “It is all too clear that anti-borders activists don’t want people even to think about people from foreign countries being in this country unlawfully,” said Dale Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of IRLI.
“They push words like ‘undocumented,’ which avoids describing that unpopular reality. The school in this case is obviously onboard with this anti-borders agenda, and decided to tarnish an innocent student’s reputation in its zeal to stamp out a much-needed legal term. We hope the court sees through this cruel attempt to establish Orwell’s Newspeak in North Carolina schools, and grants an injunction,” he added.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
