Washington Examiner

Fired Wisconsin courts director files complaint against judges who removed him

Former Director of Wisconsin’s Court System Files Complaints Against Replacement and Liberal⁤ State Supreme Court Justices

The former director of Wisconsin’s court system, Randy Koschnick, has filed five ⁣complaints against his replacement and the liberal state Supreme Court justices who voted to oust him. Koschnick claims that his dismissal was politically motivated and that‍ the new appointment is illegal.

Koschnick was⁢ appointed to his role as the state’s top nonjudicial court official in 2017 when conservatives held the ‌majority. He filed his​ grievances ‌on Tuesday with the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, an independent⁣ agency tasked with enforcing a code of conduct for judges and court commissioners‍ in the​ state.

Challenging the ⁢Legality of the Appointment

In his ⁢complaint, Koschnick argues that ‍Audrey Skwierawski, a Milwaukee County judge who has been named interim director of the state court system, is not legally⁢ allowed to be in‍ that ‌role until July 2025. He claims that⁣ the​ state constitution prohibits judges from holding⁣ nonjudicial offices until their terms end.

Koschnick also filed complaints against Justices ⁢Ann Walsh ⁣Bradley, Rebecca Dallet, Jill Karofsky, and Janet Protasiewicz.

“I think it’s a real​ threat to ⁤the system, long term, to have justices ‍not following the constitution and apparently not being concerned about it,” Koschnick said.

Response from Skwierawski

Skwierawski, who ⁢took leave⁢ from her position on the Milwaukee County Circuit‌ Court on Aug. 3, responded to the allegations in a statement. She stated that she worked with legal experts ‍and reviewed the law herself to ensure ⁣her eligibility for the new role. As director​ of state⁣ courts, she will advise the ​state Supreme Court on process improvements and oversee budgets and operations.

Conservative Chief Justice’s Disappointment

Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, a conservative, expressed⁣ her disappointment in her liberal colleagues‌ for Koschnick’s firing. She ⁢called​ it “a raw exercise of overreaching​ power”‌ and criticized the procedural and legal flaws in the ousting. However, she did not indicate that ⁤she would intervene, fearing it could lead to the ​firing of other court employees.

“It is shameful,” ⁢Ziegler added. “I‌ fear⁢ this is only the beginning.”

Political⁣ Battle ‍for Control

The fight ‌over ideological control of the⁤ court gained national attention when Janet Protasiewicz defeated former Justice Daniel Kelly in a ⁣record-breaking⁤ election. This victory shifted the balance⁢ of power from conservatives, who had been in control for 15 ⁤years, to liberals. Protasiewicz’s win now makes her the ⁤deciding vote on important issues such as ‌abortion rights, legislative maps, and potentially⁤ the 2024 presidential race.

Wisconsin Supreme Court justices are technically nonpartisan, but​ Protasiewicz has taken public ​stances‌ on abortion and legislative maps. Republicans ‍in the state legislature have threatened to ⁢impeach her if she does not recuse herself from certain cases, although the likelihood of her removal is slim due to the Democratic governor’s⁤ approval being required.

“At the ⁢end of the day, Wisconsin is a deeply and ‍bitterly divided state, politically, and those divisions are very much‌ reflected on the state Supreme Court,” said Anthony Chergosky, an​ expert on the state’s politics and courts at ​the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court⁤ did ‍not respond ⁢to a request for comment.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker