The daily wire

Ex-FBI Official: Bureau Lost Count of Capitol Breach Sources

Audit Reveals FBI Lost ‌Track⁣ of Informants Involved⁤ in Capitol Breach

A former senior FBI official revealed to House ‍lawmakers that the bureau conducted an⁤ internal audit after losing track of the number of‍ informants and sources involved in the ⁤January 6 U.S. Capitol breach.

Steven D’Antuono,⁣ former assistant director-in-charge of ⁢the Washington ⁣Field Office, testified before the House ⁢Judiciary Committee in June that his office discovered there were ⁢confidential human sources ​(CHS)​ from various ⁢field⁤ offices and other informants ​who independently went to the ​Capitol. This information was detailed in a⁢ letter sent to ⁣FBI Director Christopher Wray about the‍ bureau’s use of confidential sources.

During⁣ the hearing, Chairman Jim Jordan asked D’Antuono if he knew about the⁣ sources and if⁣ the FBI was ⁢aware they would be present among ‍the protestors. D’Antuono⁤ responded affirmatively, stating that it was‍ his belief that the FBI ‌had prior⁣ knowledge.

The letter further explained that due to the⁣ large number of CHSs present at the Capitol, the Washington Field Office requested assistance from⁤ FBI ⁢Headquarters ‌to‍ determine ⁤how many CHSs had been in attendance. The office​ received responses after reaching out to headquarters.

One example ⁢provided by D’Antuono involved a source⁢ from the Kansas City Field Office⁢ who had ‍been in contact⁢ with their handler while in the⁢ crowd. The source⁣ allegedly attempted to prevent some ⁣of⁤ the illegal activities⁣ before leaving.

These revelations have raised concerns ⁤about the FBI’s ability to track its informants and control their actions. House Judiciary Committee member Rep. ⁢Darrell‌ Issa expressed his worry, suggesting ‌that the FBI’s involvement⁤ may have contributed​ to the ⁤events of ⁢that day.

Rep. Thomas Massie ⁢also questioned U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland ⁤about the number of agents and assets present on January 5 and 6, to which Garland responded that he did not know.

Speculation‍ about the number of ⁤FBI informants present during ‌the Capitol breach arises‍ as the‌ Department‍ of Justice continues to‌ charge individuals with January 6-related federal ​crimes. Over⁣ 1,100 people have been charged, with more than 650 pleading guilty and over 600 sentenced.

Former FBI ‌official George​ Hill ⁢previously claimed that the bureau​ denied access to 11,000 hours of U.S. Capitol video ‍footage on January 6 to protect the identities of undercover officers and informants present ‌that day.

Former Capitol Hill⁣ Police Chief Steven ⁣Sund stated that the FBI had at least 18 undercover ‍agents in the crowd on January 6,⁤ along with paid informants and ⁢other authorities from the Department of Homeland Security.

It ⁢has been reported ⁤that the FBI spends an average ⁤of $42 million annually on payments to⁢ its ⁣Confidential Human Sources.

During a House Homeland Security Committee hearing, Rep. Clay Higgins ⁢asked FBI Director Christopher Wray if there were any confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters during the Capitol riot. Wray denied the presence ‍of FBI informants in⁤ the crowd‌ and dismissed any suggestion of FBI involvement in ‌orchestrating the ‍events.

 

What are the potential ​risks⁢ and consequences of the FBI’s failure to effectively monitor and​ control its ​informants⁤ in relation to the Capitol breach?

And ​about⁣ the FBI’s handling of informants and sources‍ in‍ relation to the‌ Capitol breach.‍ He pressed Garl and stated, ⁤”You‍ can’t investigate ​yourselves, and you ​certainly can’t be trusted to⁤ hold yourselves accountable.”

This‍ audit and the subsequent revelations have raised serious⁢ concerns about the FBI’s ability to effectively monitor and control its informants. The agency’s reliance⁢ on confidential human sources is crucial for⁢ gathering intelligence and preventing criminal⁣ activities. However, if the FBI cannot keep track of these sources or ensure their actions align⁢ with the agency’s ‌objectives, it raises questions about⁢ their effectiveness and accountability.

The use of informants can be a double-edged sword. While they provide valuable information‍ and access to criminal networks, there is always a risk that‌ the ‌informant may have their own agenda or‍ engage in ‍unauthorized ⁤activity. It ⁣is essential⁣ for law enforcement agencies like the FBI to have stringent⁢ protocols in place to mitigate ⁣these risks and ​ensure that informants operate within the parameters ‍set by the agency.

The failure to properly track and account for informants‍ involved in the Capitol breach ⁢not ⁢only ⁢undermines the credibility of the FBI but also raises concerns about ‌potential entrapment or‌ manipulation. If informants are allowed to act independently without⁤ proper oversight, it compromises the integrity of‍ investigations​ and prosecutions.

This revelation also calls into question the FBI’s transparency and willingness ⁣to disclose information ⁣to Congress and the public. The fact that this internal audit only came to light ‌during ⁣a congressional hearing suggests​ a lack ​of openness and​ accountability within‌ the agency. It is crucial for ⁣the ⁢American people to ⁢have confidence in the FBI’s actions, and this incident raises ‌doubts about ⁤the⁣ agency’s ⁣ability to uphold its mandate.

Moving forward,⁤ it is imperative that the⁣ FBI takes immediate steps⁢ to address these shortcomings and ‍regain public trust. This includes⁢ implementing stricter protocols for the handling and monitoring of ⁣informants, enhancing transparency and ‍accountability mechanisms, and conducting a comprehensive review⁣ of its informant ​program. The FBI must prioritize the protection of civil ‌liberties while effectively carrying out its ​mission to⁢ uphold the rule of law and protect national⁤ security.

In conclusion, the recent ⁣audit revealing the FBI’s‌ loss ⁣of track of informants ⁤involved in the Capitol breach is deeply concerning. It ⁤raises questions about the agency’s ability to effectively monitor and control ⁣its ⁢informants, as well as its transparency and accountability to Congress and the⁢ American people. ⁢The FBI must take immediate action to rectify these issues, ensuring ⁣that informants operate within the⁣ agency’s guidelines and that the public can have‍ confidence in its actions. Failure to⁤ do so risks further erosion of public trust⁢ and ⁤compromises the FBI’s ability to carry out its vital mission.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker