FTC grills Zuckerberg over Meta messages on purchase of Instagram – Washington Examiner

meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified in federal court regarding his 2012 acquisition of Instagram, amidst an ongoing antitrust lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC argues that Facebook, now part of Meta, violated antitrust laws by purchasing Instagram and WhatsApp. During the trial, FTC lawyer Daniel Matheson scrutinized Zuckerberg’s internal messages from the time of the acquisition, suggesting that Zuckerberg was more focused on neutralizing competition than improving Instagram. zuckerberg acknowledged the purchase was part of a strategic decision to buy competitors, highlighting Instagram’s superior capabilities as a photo-sharing app.The judge in the case, James Boasberg, could potentially order Meta to divest its holdings in Instagram and whatsapp if the ruling favors the FTC.


FTC grills Zuckerberg over internal messages regarding purchase of Instagram

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared in federal court in Washington, D.C., for a second day on Tuesday, testifying about his intentions for acquiring Instagram in 2012.

In 2020, the Federal Trade Commission sued Facebook, which is now under the umbrella of parent company Meta, alleging it was in violation of antitrust laws by buying both Instagram and WhatsApp.

FTC lawyer Daniel Matheson pressed Zuckerberg on Tuesday over his internal message exchanges from 2012 with then-Facebook Chief Financial Officer David Ebersman regarding the $1 billion bid for Instagram.

Daniel Matheson, a lawyer for the Federal Trade Commission, departs following the first day of a historic antitrust trial about Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s intentions in acquiring Instagram, at Barrett Prettyman U.S. Court House in Washington, Monday, April 14, 2025. (AP Photo/Nathan Howard)

“[What] I’ve been thinking about recently is how much we should be willing to pay to acquire mobile app companies like Instagram and Path that are building networks that are competitive with our own,” Zuckerberg wrote to Ebersman, then agreeing with the chief financial officer when he said the purchase of Instagram would be a way to “neutralize a potential competitor.”

During this time, Facebook was working on creating its own picture-sharing app known as Snap, which was stumbling. Zuckerberg said the company was considering “buy vs. build” strategies, ultimately deciding it made more sense to buy Instagram.

“I thought that Instagram was better at that, so I thought it was better to buy them,” Zuckerberg told the court, referencing its abilities as a camera app.

Matheson, the FTC lawyer, told Zuckerberg that the Meta CEO’s communications leading up to the purchase suggested he was not focused on making improvements to Instagram. Instead, Matheson said, pointing to a Zuckerberg message, he wanted the app to gain control of “a rapidly growing, threatening new network.”

“I’m not sure [what] the full mess of what I wrote” was, Zuckerberg told the court. “We probably tried building dozens of apps over the history of the company and the majority of them don’t go anywhere.”

FTC BEGINS HISTORIC ANTITRUST TRIAL AGAINST META

Judge James Boasberg will be ruling on the lawsuit, which is the most recent effort to rein in technology companies. Boasberg has notably been the presiding judge over several lawsuits challenging President Donald Trump’s executive actions.

A ruling in favor of the FTC could force Meta to divest itself from WhatsApp and Instagram.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker