Fulton County prosecutors summon RNC Chair, Alex Jones, in Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro case.
Fulton County Judge Approves Requests to Call RNC Chair and Radio Host as Witnesses in Election Trial
In a significant development, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has granted two requests from prosecutors to call Republican National Committee (RNC) Chair Ronna McDaniel and radio show host Alex Jones as witnesses in the upcoming trial against Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell.
Chesebro and Powell, along with former President Donald Trump and 16 others, were indicted for challenging the results of the 2020 election in Georgia. All 19 defendants face charges under the state’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, with 18 pleading not guilty. Co-defendant Scott Hall has already accepted a plea bargain.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis argued that McDaniel and Jones are crucial material witnesses.
The court order highlights Jones’ involvement in the “Stop the Steal” rally in Georgia and the January 6, 2021 events in Washington, D.C., where he marched with a bullhorn. It states, “Video footage shows that Kenneth Chesebro was marching on the Capitol alongside Alex Jones on this day. The Court finds that Kenneth Chesebro was in communication with Alex Jones regarding the attempt to disrupt and delay the January 6, 2021 joint session of Congress.”
The order further emphasizes that “Alex Jones possesses unique knowledge concerning communications between himself and Kenneth Chesebro and other known and unknown individuals involved in the multi-state, coordinated efforts to influence the results of the November 3, 2020 presidential election in Georgia and elsewhere.”
McDaniel is being called to testify due to her participation in phone call meetings with President Trump. The order states, “Ronna McDaniel participated in a phone call with Donald Trump and John Eastman in December 2020 in which she was told the importance of the RNC helping the campaign gather ‘contingent’ electors for the November 3, 2020 presidential election.” It also mentions that she received emails about plans to challenge election results in six states.
Both Jones and McDaniel are now required to testify at the trial, which is scheduled to begin on October 23. Specific dates for their testimonies have not been provided, but prosecutors will cover their travel and accommodation expenses.
Tuesday Hearing
Attorneys for Chesebro and Powell met with the judge and prosecutors on Tuesday afternoon to discuss pretrial motions.
Chesebro has filed motions to dismiss the criminal charges against him, citing defenses under the First Amendment and Supremacy Clause. He argues that his communications with his client, the Trump campaign, are protected by attorney-client privilege and should not be admissible as evidence. The indictment against him includes 21 acts related to communications he claims are privileged.
The prosecutors oppose these motions, asserting that Chesebro’s actions involve logistical arrangements for alternate slates of electors, which do not fall under protected speech or legal advice.
Chesebro’s attorney, Manny Aurora, counters that lawyers often provide instructions to their clients, and such actions should be covered by attorney-client privilege.
The hearing lasted two and a half hours, with no new orders issued by the judge. Procedural concerns were raised, and the judge informed both parties that these motions would be argued during the trial, not in a pretrial hearing. The defense disagreed, maintaining that the case should not have been brought at all, as they believe the prosecution has failed to establish any criminal wrongdoing.
“Both sides are eager to dive into it and do battle,” remarked the judge.
Oct. 23 Trial
While Chesebro’s and Powell’s charges are unrelated, the judge ordered them to be tried together due to the involvement of 19 defendants and an estimated 150 witnesses from the prosecution’s side. Both defendants requested a speedy trial.
Judge McAfee did not rule out the possibility of severing some of the remaining 16 defendants’ cases in the future. He stated, “Even if the State’s case remains identical in length, and the aggregate time invested by the Court is increased, the burden on the jurors for each individual trial is lessened through shorter separate trials. We must consider the ripple effects of a months-long, multi-defendant trial on the local criminal justice system, sidelining dozens of defense counsel from handling other cases and preventing this Court—and quite likely most colleagues—from managing the rest of the docket.”
What motions has Powell filed in relation to the upcoming trial, and what arguments does she put forth to support them?
Ble in court. In addition, he claims that the charges are politically motivated and an infringement on his constitutional rights.
Powell, on the other hand, has filed motions to suppress evidence obtained through search warrants and to exclude certain witnesses from testifying. She argues that the warrants were unlawfully executed and that the witnesses’ testimonies are unreliable and biased.
The Tuesday hearing provided an opportunity for the defense teams to present their arguments and for the judge to consider the motions. The courtroom was packed with reporters and supporters from both sides.
Judge McAfee will rule on the motions in the coming weeks, prior to the start of the trial. The decision to call McDaniel and Jones as witnesses is a significant step in the prosecution’s strategy to establish a connection between the defendants and the alleged attempts to overturn the election results.
If convicted, Chesebro and Powell could face severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment.
Controversy and Public Interest
The upcoming trial has attracted national attention due to its high-profile nature and the involvement of prominent figures like Donald Trump and Ronna McDaniel.
Supporters of Chesebro and Powell argue that they are being unfairly targeted for their political beliefs and that their actions were protected under the First Amendment.
On the other hand, critics of the defendants assert that they deliberately spread false information and fueled the flames of conspiracy theories, ultimately leading to the events of January 6, 2021, at the Capitol.
The trial will likely shed light on the extent of their involvement and the validity of the allegations against them. It will also serve as a test case for future legal action against individuals who challenged the election results.
Conclusion
The decision to call Ronna McDaniel and Alex Jones as witnesses in the upcoming trial against Kenneth Chesebro and Sidney Powell reinforces the gravity of the charges and the prosecution’s determination to prove the defendants’ involvement in efforts to undermine the 2020 election results.
Their testimonies are expected to provide crucial insights into the alleged coordination between the defendants and other individuals, as well as shed light on their knowledge and motivations.
The trial, scheduled to commence on October 23, will undoubtedly be closely watched by the public and legal experts alike, as it has the potential to set important precedents regarding the limits of free speech and the consequences of challenging election outcomes.
The outcome of this trial could have far-reaching implications for future prosecution of individuals involved in similar cases, making it a pivotal moment in the nation’s ongoing battle to uphold the integrity of its electoral process.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...