Conservative News Daily

Gaetz baffles Lt. General with Air Force’s gender terms – He’s clueless about their meaning.

Is the⁣ U.S. Military Going “Woke”?

Under ⁤President ⁤Joe Biden, our military has been turned — at one ‍of ⁤the most dangerous points in recent geopolitical memory — into a social experiment, one where⁣ “a diverse and inclusive force is a war fighting ⁤imperative!”

Those aren’t my words or the words of ‍a conservative⁤ pundit, ⁤but instead the words on ‌a slide in a presentation given at ​the U.S. Air Force Academy. It’s not like the Biden administration is hiding this.​ For⁤ instance, consider this opening ⁢paragraph of a September 2022 article on the U.S. Department of​ Defense’s website: “Diversity in the U.S. military and ⁤in ‍the militaries‌ of ⁣partner nations is a⁣ strategic ⁣imperative, the commander of U.S.⁢ Transportation ‌Command said.”

The evidence for‌ this, Air Force Gen. Jacqueline‍ Van Ovost said, was a book that ‌“linked the citizen status within the nation and in their⁤ military to battlefield ‍performance.”

If ⁤Lt. ⁣Gen. ⁣Richard‌ M. Clark, ‌head of the Air Force Academy, indeed read the⁢ same tome that Gen. Van Ovost read, he didn’t quite absorb ⁣it as well, since he agrees with‍ her sentiment and the party ​line, but he‌ wasn’t ‍particularly​ good at‍ answering how that diversity and inclusion ‍was a “war ⁢fighting” or “strategic” ⁤imperative when the‌ question‌ was ⁢posed by Florida GOP Rep. Matt Gaetz during Wednesday testimony ⁣before ​the House Armed Services Committee.

In a viral ⁤clip, Gaetz first asked the lieutenant general whether he believed⁤ the⁤ statement. Indeed he did. Then he asked whether the Mongols, the Vikings,⁢ or ⁤the forces in modern ⁢ Ukraine ⁢and Russia ‍ found that diversity was a “war fighting imperative!”, to‍ quote the‍ slide, exclamation point and all.

Clark demurred on whether‍ the Mongols ⁤or ⁢Vikings were ⁣diverse, instead telling Gaetz⁣ that‌ “I’m​ looking at our country, the most diverse country in the world.”

“But you⁢ would … acknowledge that ⁤throughout⁢ history, including present history, that ⁣statement hasn’t borne ‌true in every example.⁢ Right?” Gaetz asked.

Clark responded by saying that, in the‍ case of Russia ‌and Ukraine, “those countries‍ have to rely on the ⁤full force of their population,​ to build ​a war fighting ⁤to win our wars, and that’s why it’s⁤ important ⁣for ‍us to be ​diverse.”

Has our military⁣ gone full-on woke?

Has our military gone⁤ full-on woke?

function ffp_getCookie(cname)⁤ {
var name = cname + ⁤”=”;
var decodedCookie =‌ decodeURIComponent(document.cookie);
var​ ca = decodedCookie.split(‘;’);
for(var i = 0; i

OK, then, Gaetz said: “So let’s look at the population that ‌actually⁤ makes‍ up the fighting force,” ​Gaetz said. “Now we have more men and women, right? 70-30-ish?” The lieutenant answered that was ⁢correct.

“And ⁣of the men we have, most of them are not transgender men. Most of them ⁣are cisgender men, right?” Gaetz asked. Again, correct. “But yet, at our academies, we put ‌push something ​called the Brooke Owens ‍Fellowship. Are you⁤ familiar with that?” Again, yes.

For‍ the uninitiated, on its website, the Brooke Owens Fellowship⁤ describes itself as an organization “designed to serve both as‍ an ⁤inspiration ⁢and as a career boost to⁢ capable young women and⁢ other gender⁢ minorities who, like Brooke, aspire to explore our sky and stars, to shake up the aerospace​ industry, and to ⁤help ⁣their⁤ fellow people here on planet ‌Earth. We do this by matching up to forty students ⁣per year with purpose-driven, paid internships at leading ‍aerospace companies and organizations and‌ with senior and executive level mentors.”

The Air Force Academy allows cadets to apply for the program.

“And in that fellowship, it‌ specifically says, If​ you ⁣are a cisgender man, this program isn’t ⁣for you,” Gaetz continued.

“So you just ​said that your answer on ‌why‌ we why we do ‌such this, this full hug of​ these diversity concepts is ‌because​ it’s all about the fighting ‍force that⁤ we draw from, but you’re literally pushing a‌ program in the academies that ​says, if you’re a cisgender woman, a transgender‍ woman, a non-binary, agender, bi-gender, two-spirit, demigender — what’s demigender?” he stopped to ask.

“Sir, that’s a that’s a term ⁤of the people that are eligible​ for that particular scholarship,”​ Clark said.

“What’s a demigender person?” Gaetz asked.

“It’s a person⁣ who looks at their ‍gender in a different, uh,‍ a ‍different way than I ⁢do, sir,” Clark‍ responded.

A few ​seconds later: “Do ⁤you ⁤know⁢ what demigender really means?”

“I’m not really sure, sir,” Clark answered.

“Right. So do ⁢you know what ⁤agender means? All one‌ word, ⁤not a-space-gender, but agender?” ‌Gaetz asked. No on that one, too. We eventually got ⁣to Gaetz’s ultimate point:‍ “So here we are, pushing a fellowship,‍ calling for people that you don’t even know​ what the words mean. And the number one group of ⁢people, the cisgender men are excluded?”⁣ Gaetz⁢ asked. “Should we be pushing programs that we can’t⁢ define, that ⁣exclude the largest group of servicemembers? … Why are you⁣ allowing your cadets to⁤ apply for a program when you cannot⁣ define ⁢the basic⁣ terms of eligibility?”

Clark wasn’t helpful here, either, ‌simply ⁢calling it “an opportunity for us to develop them as‌ warfighters.”

“But‍ you don’t even know what the words mean, how can you ⁢use this as a way to develop the warfighters if you don’t know what‌ it means?” ⁢Gaetz asked. Again,‍ no helpful answer.

Just in case you were wondering,⁤ blog​ GenderGP defines ‌ agender ‍as people‍ who “see themselves ​as neither a man nor a woman, or both. They’re gender-neutral and often are described as genderfree or genderless.” Meanwhile, according to LGBT-centric outlet Queer in ⁣the World, demigender refers⁢ to “a gender identity​ that refers ⁤to⁤ a partial, but not ⁢a full‍ connection to a specific ⁢gender identity ⁢or the idea of gender. Many demigender individuals also identify as nonbinary.”​ Now⁢ you know, and knowing is half the battle.

Apparently, that’s​ half of ⁢the battle‌ Lt.⁢ Gen. Clark hasn’t fought‍ —⁢ but it’s ⁤not​ exactly his fault. ‍The times, they are ‌a-changin’ inside⁤ the Biden administration’s new ⁣woke military, ‌and we cannot expect‌ men like the lieutenant general to understand these terms, just to understand that they are the new priority, and by giving preference to​ them, we somehow confer strength‌ onto our military.

Why? How? It’s ‌not like ‍we can expect this top military official to answer that. After⁤ all, when he’s​ asked who he’s even giving preference to,⁣ he gets​ stumped. Sounds like he needs to read that bunkum book the commander ⁢of U.S. ⁤Transportation Command was leaning on⁢ when she made the⁤ same remarks.

The post Gaetz Stumps Lt. General with Gender‌ Terms Air Force Promotes – He’s Got No Clue ‍What They⁣ Mean ‌appeared first on​ The Western Journal.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker