German judge sentenced for ruling against government’s mask mandates.

A Brave Judge ⁣Stands Against Mask Mandates in Germany

In a bold move that has captured national attention, a German court⁢ has sentenced one‍ of its own judges ‍to ‌prison ⁢for ruling against the government’s⁤ mask ​mandates.

In 2021, Judge Christian⁢ Dettmar ‌made headlines when he struck down a local government ⁣ordinance that required schoolchildren to wear masks in the German state of Thuringia. However,‌ his courageous decision has⁤ come at a great cost.

Judge Dettmar ‍now faces the loss‌ of his legal career and pension, along with a two-year suspended prison sentence for‌ allegedly ‌”perverting the law.”

A Stand for Children’s Well-being

During the pandemic-era lockdowns, ‌the Thuringian state government mandated that all children ⁢wear masks, maintain social distancing, and undergo virus tests⁣ while at school.

However,⁤ Judge Dettmar ruled that masks should ⁢not ‌be mandatory for⁤ children at two schools in Weimar, Thuringia. This decision came⁣ after a concerned mother raised⁢ concerns about the‌ negative effects of masks on her children’s health, including insomnia, nausea,⁣ and headaches.

With the welfare ⁢of the ‌children in mind, Judge Dettmar ⁢informed the schools in ⁤Weimar that they could no longer enforce‍ the mask mandate.

Unsurprisingly, the ⁣state government​ was outraged by⁤ Judge Dettmar’s ruling and demanded his punishment ‌and removal from the bench.

The‍ Higher Regional Court in Erfurt eventually overturned the judge’s decision, ⁢following a complaint ‍by the state’s education department. Students were once again required ​to wear masks in schools.

The district court in Erfurt argued that only an administrative court had the jurisdiction to make such ⁤a ruling⁤ and that Judge Dettmar had overstepped his authority.

Despite the backlash, Judge Dettmar defended⁢ his decision, stating that he had consulted⁢ certified ​university experts before making his ruling.

Accusations and a​ Suspended Sentence

Unfortunately, Judge Dettmar’s suspension from the bench was not the end of his troubles.

State prosecutors took action against him, charging him⁢ with “perverting the law” and ruling on a matter outside of his⁢ jurisdiction.

During the trial, prosecutors⁤ argued that the judge had made⁤ his ruling as a political​ statement against lockdowns, rather than out of⁤ genuine concern ⁤for the children involved. They also accused him of deleting emails and files to cover up the ⁢true motive behind his decision.

A police raid on his home and office further revealed alleged bias against lockdown measures in his private correspondence.

Despite these accusations, Judge⁢ Dettmar maintained ⁤that he had consulted with ‍scientists ⁤who‌ were critical of the government’s measures‍ at the time.

Currently, Judge‍ Dettmar’s legal team is considering an appeal as he‌ faces ⁤the possibility of dismissal from his duties as a ⁢judge, in⁤ addition to his suspended sentence.

According to⁤ German law, a civil servant sentenced to‍ a custodial sentence of more‍ than 12 months loses both their position and pension. The ‌prosecutors, who initially sought a three-year‌ sentence, are also appealing the ruling.

The defense argues that the trial was politically motivated and an attempt to silence​ dissenting voices.

Despite the‌ challenges he ⁢now faces, ⁣Judge Dettmar remains steadfast in his belief that he made the right decision for the well-being of the schoolchildren in Weimar.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases