oann

Google will protect users of generative AI from copyright claims.

Google to‌ Defend Users of AI Systems ⁢Against IP Violation Claims

By Blake Brittain ⁣|⁣ October 12, 2023 – 4:07 PM UTC

Advertisement

Google ‌announced on Thursday that it will stand ⁢up for users of its generative ⁤artificial-intelligence systems in the ‍Google ‌Cloud and Workspace platforms if‍ they face accusations of ​intellectual​ property⁣ violations. This move follows similar commitments made by Microsoft,⁤ Adobe, and other tech giants.

Major⁢ technology companies like Google have ​been heavily investing in generative AI, racing to‌ integrate it into their⁢ products. However, prominent writers, illustrators, and copyright owners have filed lawsuits claiming that both the use of their⁤ work‍ to train ⁣AI systems ‍and the content generated by these⁢ systems infringe upon their ⁢rights.

“To our knowledge, Google is the first in the industry to offer a comprehensive, two-pronged approach ⁤to indemnity” that specifically covers both types‌ of claims, ‌stated a company spokesperson.

Google’s new policy applies to software, including its Vertex AI development platform and Duet AI system, which generates text and ‌images in Google Workspace and Cloud programs. Notably,⁤ the press release did not mention Google’s‍ well-known generative ⁢AI chatbot program, Bard.

The company clarified that the indemnity does not apply if users “intentionally ​create ⁤or use generated output to infringe the rights of others.”

It is worth ⁢noting⁣ that the recent wave⁤ of lawsuits related to generative AI has ​primarily targeted the companies that‌ own​ these systems, ⁣such as ​Google, ‌rather than individual end users.

AI defendants​ argue that the‌ use of training data scraped from ‌the internet qualifies as fair use under ⁤U.S. copyright law.

Reporting ⁣by Blake ​Brittain in Washington.⁣ Editing ⁤by David Bario and Aurora​ Ellis

Advertisement

The State Department confirms the American ​Death Toll in Israel, IAF continues to put pressure on Hamas and Scalise edges out Jordan for House Speaker.

As Israel remains ‍under attack by Hamas terrorists, many people don’t understand ‌the history of the tension.

Israel⁢ expected to launch ground assault: “What will Joe Biden say two weeks from now when the death tolls inside Gaza are growing and people are calling Israel’s actions a‌ humanitarian crisis a violation of‍ international law?

With wide-open borders, the ‌CBP (U.S. Customs and Border Protection) has flagged more than ​73,000‍ illegals as “Special⁢ Interest Aliens” who may⁢ have ⁢ties to terrorist groups.

Google announced on Thursday ⁤that it ⁣will defend users of ⁢generative artificial-intelligence systems in its Google Cloud and Workspace platforms.

China has ​published proposed⁣ security requirements for firms‌ offering services powered by generative⁤ artificial intelligence.

Internet companies Google, Amazon, and Cloudflare ‌claim to have successfully withstood the internet’s largest-known denial ⁤of service attack.

Samsung⁣ reported a smaller-than-expected 78% drop in preliminary⁣ third-quarter profit.

Why have lawsuits related to generative AI primarily targeted companies like Google rather than individual end users

T does not constitute copyright infringement, as the data is publicly⁤ available. However, copyright holders ⁤contend that the use ⁤of their work ​to train AI systems, as well as‍ the content generated⁢ by these systems, falls ⁤within ‍the realm of copyright infringement and should be subject to legal action.

In response to these claims, Google has taken the ⁤proactive step‍ of offering indemnity to​ its users. This means that if a user of Google’s ​generative AI systems on the Cloud and Workspace platforms ‌faces accusations of intellectual ⁢property violations,‌ Google will defend them. This move aligns‍ with the⁣ actions taken by other major technology companies such​ as Microsoft⁢ and Adobe, who have‍ also committed to standing up for their users in ⁣similar situations.

The growing popularity and integration of generative AI in various products have inevitably ⁢led to legal disputes. ‍Writers, illustrators, and copyright owners have filed‌ lawsuits, arguing that their work has been utilized without their consent and that the ⁤AI-generated content infringes ⁣upon their rights.

Google’s comprehensive approach to indemnity covers both types of⁢ claims – those related to⁣ the use of training data and those regarding the content⁤ generated by ⁣the ⁤AI ⁣systems. By offering this two-pronged approach, Google aims to provide ⁣its users with the necessary protection and reassurance.

It ‍is important⁣ to note​ that Google’s new ‍policy only applies to its ⁤software, including the Vertex AI development platform and the Duet AI system. These systems are responsible for generating text and images within‍ Google Workspace and⁢ Cloud programs. Interestingly, the press release does not mention‌ Bard, Google’s⁢ well-known generative AI chatbot program, ⁤suggesting that ‍it ⁢may not⁣ be covered by the indemnity.

Google does make it clear that the indemnity does⁣ not apply if users intentionally create or use generated ⁢output to infringe on the⁣ rights of others. This⁢ clause highlights the importance of responsible usage of AI technology and ensures that users cannot exploit the indemnity‌ to​ engage in copyright infringement knowingly.

The recent‌ focus of lawsuits related to ‌generative AI⁣ has primarily been⁤ directed towards the companies that​ own and⁣ develop these systems, such ‍as Google, rather than individual end users. This may be attributed to the larger impact and financial⁤ resources of these companies, making them⁣ more attractive targets for ⁤legal action.

By offering indemnity to its users, Google demonstrates its‌ commitment to protecting their ‍interests and fostering responsible AI usage. This move sets a precedent in the industry​ and ⁤serves as a ‍proactive ‌measure to address the legal challenges surrounding generative⁤ AI. It remains to be seen⁤ how this policy will evolve and whether​ other companies will follow suit​ in prioritizing user protection ⁢and defending ⁣against⁣ IP violation claims.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker