GOP Senator Leaves Biden’s Nominee Struggling to Define Legal Terms
A Judge’s Qualifications and a Stumbling Nominee: GOP Senator Exposes the Flaws in the Confirmation Process
A judge holds immense power as the ultimate decision-maker in a courtroom. They can even overturn a jury verdict if they believe there was insufficient evidence or a legal error. With such responsibility, one would expect judicial nominees to have extensive legal expertise and a solid understanding of basic legal concepts.
However, as Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana recently demonstrated, this is not always the case. Kennedy, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, questioned Sarah Hill, a nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, and revealed her lack of knowledge on fundamental legal matters.
Hill, who could become the first Native American woman to serve as a federal judge in Oklahoma, struggled to answer basic questions during the hearing. When asked about “collateral estoppel,” she stumbled and provided an unclear response. Similarly, she struggled to differentiate between a “stay order” and an ”injunction” and admitted her limited familiarity with “multi-district litigation.”
These exchanges raised serious concerns about Hill’s qualifications to be a judge. It also shed light on the flaws in the nomination and confirmation process. Lifetime appointments require highly skilled, ethical, and fair judges who are the cream of the legal profession. However, partisan politics often result in underqualified candidates being pushed through in hearings that may be influenced by external factors.
Sen. Kennedy’s pointed questioning and comments exposed these issues and highlighted the need for more rigorous scrutiny of judicial nominees. The American people deserve judges who possess the necessary expertise and integrity to uphold the law.
A Note from Our Deputy Managing Editor:
I walked into the office one morning and noticed something strange. Half of The Western Journal’s readership was missing.
It had finally happened. Facebook had flipped THE switch.
Maybe it was because we wrote about ivermectin. Or election integrity. Or the Jan. 6 detainees. Or ballot mules.
Whatever the reason, I immediately knew what to do. We had to turn to you because, frankly, we know you are the only ones we can trust.
Can you help? Every donation to The Western Journal goes directly to funding our team of story researchers, writers, and editors who doggedly pursue the truth and expose the corrupt elites.
Can I count on you for a small donation? We operate on a shoestring compared to other news media companies, so I can personally promise that not a penny of your donation will be wasted.
If you would rather become a WJ member outright, you can do that today as well.
We will use every single cent to fight against the lies and corruption in high places. And as long as we have your help, we will never give up.
Sincerely,
Josh Manning
Deputy Managing Editor
The Western Journal
What concerns did the narrator have about the newspaper’s focus on politics and lack of coverage on important social issues?
Articles featured on the front page were about politics. As a newspaper that prided itself on balanced reporting, this seemed off. I approached our deputy managing editor, Mark, to discuss my concerns.
“Hey Mark, have you noticed that we’re heavily focused on politics lately?” I asked.
He sighed and looked up from his desk. “Yeah, it’s been a challenge,” he admitted. “Politics is polarizing, and it tends to generate a lot of clicks and engagement. We have to strike a balance between what people want to read and what they need to read.”
I nodded, understanding the delicate tightrope we had to walk. But there was something that bothered me beyond the attention-grabbing headlines and constant political discourse: the lack of coverage on important social issues.
“Mark, I think we need to diversify our content. It feels like we’re neglecting other significant stories, like social justice, environmental issues, and human interest pieces,” I suggested.
He leaned back in his chair, contemplating my words. ”You’re right. While politics is undeniably vital, we also have a responsibility to inform our readers about a wider array of topics. Let’s discuss this further in the editorial meeting later today.”
That afternoon, we gathered in the conference room with the rest of the editorial team. I shared my concerns and proposed including a section dedicated to social issues every week.
“That’s a great idea,” one of the editors chimed in. “We need to provide a more comprehensive picture of the world and address the topics that affect people’s lives on a daily basis.”
The team agreed, and we established the new section, which would cover a range of issues like climate change, mental health, immigration, and various human interest stories. We also decided to create partnerships with local organizations working on important social initiatives to ensure thorough and accurate reporting.
As the deputy managing editor, Mark took the lead on overseeing this new section. He brought in experts from different fields as guest contributors, ensuring a well-rounded perspective on these crucial topics. Within a month, our publication reflected a more balanced approach, and the feedback from our readers was overwhelmingly positive.
While politics will always have a prominent place in our newspaper, we now prioritize a wider range of news. Our purpose as journalists is not only to inform but also to educate and inspire. By covering a diverse selection of topics, we can contribute to a more informed and empathetic society.
As the days rolled on, I noticed that the front page of The Western Journal showcased not just politics, but also stories about art, culture, and the achievements of everyday heroes. It was a small step, but an important one in ensuring that our newspaper truly represented the interests and concerns of our readership, and for that, I was immensely proud.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...