Government contract requires hotels accommodating migrants to have a minimum of 3 stars.
Government Contract Stipulates Minimum Level of Luxury for Migrants - Hotels Must Have 3 or More Stars
With the dangers posed by allowing migrants traveling in ramshackle watercraft to try to enter the United Kingdom, you would think that the country would be doing everything in its power to discourage it. In fact, quite the opposite is happening — at least if a report about their lodging conditions is any indication.
On Friday, the U.K. Telegraph reported that the country’s Home Office — which is somewhat analogous to America’s Department of Homeland Security, albeit with a wider purview — was telling contractors housing so-called “small-boat migrants” that they needed to be housed “at least a minimum of three stars.”
This comes as the costs of housing the migrants approaches the equivalent of roughly $10 million U.S. per day.
Concerns and Contradictions
Home Secretary Suella Braverman told Parliament she was “very concerned about hotels” and insisted their use was “unacceptable.”
“It is totally unacceptable that too many towns and cities around the country now house the 45,000 asylum seekers who are in hotels,” Braverman said, adding “it is not right that the British taxpayer is forking out the cost.”
However, Braverman’s Home Office has apparently been just doing what it does, not doing what she says.
The Telegraph reviewed the most recent contract that was issued by the Home Office and found this clause under the “mandatory requirements” for hotels that were booked for migrants: “The location of the accommodation will be carried out at locations close to amenities and transport networks. Contracted venues should be at least a minimum of three stars.”
According to the BBC, so-called “small boat arrivals” were responsible for about 45 percent of asylum appliers in the U.K. in 2022, with 45,755 having made the dangerous journey across the English Channel that year.
Numbers in 2019 and 2020 were well below 10,000, but that spiked in 2021. As of Aug. 29, 20,101 individuals have crossed the channel, including 3,824 in June — a record number for that month.
And while this is a U.K. problem, the roots of one of the largest drivers of illegal immigration by boat to the country could be said to be a failure of President Joe Biden’s administration, as well — namely, the fall of Afghanistan to the Taliban.
According to the numbers, Afghanis represent the largest number of asylum seekers in the first half of 2023, with 3,326. Another roughly 3,200 applications came from Iran, with India, Bangladesh and Pakistan trailing them.
However, in 2022, Albanians made up the largest group of asylum-seekers crossing the English Channel, with 12,301 from the European nation making the dangerous journey — roughly 28 percent, according to the BBC.
Now, how often are illegal arrivals put up in three-star hotels?
“A Home Office spokesman said that the vast majority of hotels used to house asylum seekers did not have a minimum star requirement and that the contract with the three star requirement was a ‘contingency contract used minimally,’” the Telegraph reported. “He added that the use of hotels was a temporary solution.”
However, according to LBC Radio, an independent radio broadcaster in the U.K., a new report pegs the government’s spending on illegal immigrant hotel rooms at £3 billion a year, or roughly $3.67 billion U.S.
“We need to stop the boats to relieve the unsustainable pressure on our asylum system and accommodation services, which is costing over £3 billion a year,” the report reads.
“The Illegal Migration Act will ensure anyone arriving illegally can be detained and swiftly removed, so that people know they cannot skip the queue by coming here illegally.
“This goes further than ever before to do what is necessary to fix the issue, but legislative changes take time and there is no single silver bullet. In the meantime, we must take action to address the unacceptable costs of housing migrants in hotels which is costing the taxpayer around £8 million a day.”
Former Conservative Party minister Sir John Hayes told the Telegraph that small-boat migrants ought to “expect a much more basic level of provision” than a minimum three-star hotel: “My constituents wouldn’t expect any illegal immigrant to be housed in a place they couldn’t afford to stay in themselves,” he said.
“We need to provide safe and clean accommodation but it should be basic — three-star is well above the level taxpayers would expect to be funding. In truth, we’ve got to move these people out of hotels altogether.”
Yes, but the idea that there is the will to do this sort of thing in the U.K. is another thing entirely. Keep in mind that the Conservative Party, or Tories, are in power.
Never mind that they haven’t even bothered trying to conserve a single thing about the U.K., they’re basically a slightly paler version of the Labour Party, albeit one that grumbles a little bit more as it gives taxpayers’ money away to the same culprits: an inefficient public health care system, a whole host of other social programs and, of course, subsidizing illegal immigrants.
“It’s pretty obvious that the Home Office has completely failed to get a grip on the use of the hotels,” one anonymous senior Tory told the Telegraph “The Home Secretary’s rhetoric does not match the reality – she says she’s got a grip on this but the situation is out of control.”
At least she can be confident the immigrants will be staying in style, however.
The post Government Contract Stipulates Minimum Level of Luxury for Migrants – Hotels Must Have 3 or More Stars appeared first on The Western Journal.
What balance should the United Kingdom strike between providing humanitarian assistance and considering the concerns of its citizens when addressing the issue of small-boat migration
9wQGZpHwkL9ypS4-false” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>BBC.
The Contradiction of Luxury Housing
The issue at hand isn’t just the number of migrants entering the United Kingdom, but the apparent contradiction in providing them with luxury accommodations. The government’s contract stipulating a minimum level of luxury, specifically requiring hotels to have three or more stars, raises several concerns and contradictions.
Firstly, the cost of housing these migrants is astronomical, reaching approximately $10 million US dollars per day. With such exorbitant expenses, it is questionable why the government is demanding accommodations of a high standard, requiring taxpayers to foot the bill for luxury hotels. This lavish treatment seems incongruent with the urgency and seriousness of the situation.
The Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, expressed her own concerns about housing migrants in hotels, deeming it “unacceptable.” She emphasized that it is unfair for British taxpayers to bear the financial burden. However, her department’s actions contradict her words. The Home Office’s contract explicitly dictates that contracted venues must have a minimum of three stars.
While concerns may arise about the housing conditions of migrants, prioritizing luxury accommodations sends conflicting messages. On the one hand, it implies that migrants are entitled to a certain level of comfort and luxury, which may incentivize further migration attempts. On the other hand, it seems unjust that the government is providing such indulgent housing while neglecting other pressing issues, such as the national housing crisis.
Root Causes and Accountability
The surge in small-boat arrivals can be attributed, at least in part, to the instability in Afghanistan following its fall to the Taliban. Many Afghans seek asylum in the United Kingdom as a means of escaping the violence and repression in their home country. The extension of support to Afghan asylum seekers reflects the global responsibility to provide assistance in times of crisis.
However, it is essential to address the root causes of this influx of migrants. The Biden administration’s handling of the situation in Afghanistan has been widely criticized, as it inadvertently contributed to the rise in asylum seekers attempting to reach the UK. The failure to stabilize the situation in Afghanistan has led to increased migration, placing additional strain on the UK’s resources.
Moreover, the influx of migrants from Albania also raises questions about the effectiveness of border controls and global cooperation. Identifying the underlying factors that drive people to risk their lives in small boats is crucial in order to find appropriate solutions. Government policies and international efforts should focus on tackling the root causes and providing sustainable support to regions facing instability, economic challenges, or political turmoil.
A Call for Prudent Actions
As the United Kingdom continues to grapple with the issue of small-boat migration, it is crucial to strike a balance between humanitarian assistance and prudent decision-making. The government must consider the implications of providing luxury accommodations to migrants while also addressing the concerns of British citizens.
Efforts should be directed towards implementing effective border control measures, offering robust support for countries facing crises, and working collaboratively at the international level to find comprehensive solutions. Providing safe and dignified conditions for migrants is important, but it should not come at the expense of taxpayer money or inadvertently encourage further irregular migrations.
Ultimately, a thoughtful and well-planned approach, considering both short-term and long-term solutions, is necessary to address the challenges posed by small-boat migration and provide a fair and sustainable response.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
