The epoch times

Governor Pritzker rejects bill to end ban on new Illinois nuclear plants.

Illinois Governor Vetoes Bill to ⁢Revive ‍Nuclear Energy⁢ Production

Illinois’s Governor vetoed a bill that would make nuclear energy‌ production possible again, even​ though the bill⁢ garnered bipartisan and bicameral support in the state.

The first reason given by Illinois ​Governor Jay ⁢Robert Pritzker (D)​ was that nuclear‌ reactors would be costly to build.

“The bill is vetoed because the vague definitions ⁣in the bill, including the overly⁣ broad definition of advanced reactors, will open the ‍door to the proliferation of large-scale nuclear reactors that ​are‌ so costly to build that they will cause exorbitant ratepayer-funded bailouts,” Mr. Pritzker’s office said, cited in a WTVO television report.

“Additionally, it provides ‌no ⁢regulatory protections or updates to address ‌the ‌health and safety of Illinois residents who would live and ‍work around these new reactors.”

The​ first part of Mr. Pritzker’s response is about advanced nuclear reactors, which may refer to a new nuclear technology of⁤ small nuclear reactors, ⁣according to Capitol⁤ News Illinois.

These small modular reactors (SMRs) have not been deployed ⁤yet anywhere ​in⁢ the country, and only one design is ⁤approved by regulators in the United States.

New nuclear energy⁣ technologies such as SMRs and microreactors look to improve upon‌ the large, clunky nuclear power​ plants of old with reactors ‍that have⁢ a much smaller footprint and ‍could be applied in remote industrial operations, mining projects, military bases,⁢ and disaster relief areas. SMRs could ⁢be in the size of a shipping container.

A ‍sign marks the entrance of the Exelon nuclear ​power generating station in Braidwood,​ Ill., on March 17, 2006. ⁢(Scott Olson/Getty Images)

The second part of‌ the governor’s response mentions ⁢health concerns over nuclear⁢ energy production.

After nuclear fuel is used, it continues to emit potentially⁢ hazardous radiation for tens of thousands of years. ‍Eventually, ⁣this spent fuel should be moved to a long-term disposal⁤ facility, although no‍ such facility has ever been designated or ⁢built in the​ U.S., Capitol News​ Illinois reported. “This means waste is often kept on-site at nuclear facilities⁤ in pools⁣ or in steel canisters designed to block radiation.”

The decades-old moratorium in ⁢Illinois, in other words, a prohibition on new nuclear energy ‍plants, included a nuclear waste facility to solve health concerns, but it has ⁤never ⁣been ‍built. The ban has been‌ in⁤ place since 1987.

The​ Illinois⁣ state legislature passed the ‌now-vetoed bill​ S.B. 0076 in⁢ May, a bill that would repeal the state’s​ moratorium on new ⁣nuclear power plant construction.

After‍ passing the ⁣Senate in a 39-13 vote⁢ on March⁢ 30,​ the‌ legislation proceeded to the House,⁤ where it was​ amended ‌and approved 84–22 ⁤on May 18, then ‍sent back to the ‍Senate for‌ concurrence. On May 19, the Senate agreed, 36-14‍ to​ the proposed amendment, according to Nuclear Newswire. The bill then went to Gov. Pritzker’s⁢ office‍ for the final decision.

Governor Pritzker did not comment on the bill after its passage, but‌ said some⁤ words that seemed supportive,

“These ⁤are smaller, less prone to an accident, more likely⁤ for us​ to⁤ be able ‌to maintain them for a ​long ​period of ‌time—that’s something that’s worthy⁣ of consideration,” he ⁤said. ⁢“Now the devil’s ⁣in the details, and we want to make‍ sure‍ that we’re not just opening this up​ to nuclear everywhere or any ‍type ‌of nuclear.”

Proponents ⁤of the bill‌ say that nuclear power is a ⁤clean ⁤form of energy, that aligns with Mr. Pritzker’s Climate and Equitable​ Jobs Act, which ‍puts Illinois⁤ on a path of zero ‌fossil fuel⁤ by 2050. In their view, ⁢nuclear energy can provide⁣ stable electricity when the sunlight ‌is not enough or the wind ‌does not⁢ blow.

Power generating windmills above a nuclear⁢ power plant operated by ‌Exelon near Marseilles, Ill., on June 13, 2018. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

According to the grid operators that⁣ serve Illinois, the state will see an increase of 20 percent in electricity demand in the next 15 years.

Nuclear ⁢advocates say that relying⁤ solely on ⁢renewable​ energy to meet this demand would ‍be ‌prohibitively ⁢expensive.⁣ A report commissioned by the Nuclear Energy⁣ Institute estimated that aggressive⁢ deployment of new nuclear power generation could save customers ‍$449⁤ billion between‌ now and 2050 if the‌ nation meets⁢ its carbon-free ‍energy goals.

Nuclear construction was mostly abandoned in the United States ⁣after⁤ the 1980s. In Illinois, there are 11 operating nuclear power⁤ reactors at six sites.

The Bill’s‌ Details

Introduced on January 20 by Sen. Sue Rezin (R), S.B.⁤ 0076 ⁣deletes language in​ the Illinois⁢ Public Utilities Act ⁣that ​forbids nuclear plant construction in the state until the Illinois Environmental Protection ⁣Agency determines that the ‌federal government “has identified​ and⁢ approved a demonstrable technology or means for the disposal



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker