The daily wire

Hamas And Its Media Allies Baffle With Bulls***

The Israel-Hamas Conflict: Baffling with Bulls***

The story of ​the current Israel-Hamas conflict‌ happens to ⁤be extremely simple.

Hamas is a ⁣genocidal Jew-hating ‍organization that openly seeks the extermination⁣ of Israel. This makes ‌it only the latest ⁣and most radical iteration of a radical Muslim movement that has ⁢sought Israel’s⁣ destruction since long before Israel was born. That ⁣mission has not ⁣waned in ⁤the ⁣76 years of ‍modern Israel’s existence. Unfortunately, that mission also happens to be the passionate belief⁢ system of‍ a vast majority of Muslims living ⁤in ⁤the Gaza Strip and West ⁤Bank.

Israel is a democracy, the world’s only Jewish state, and has ‍repeatedly sought to make land-for-peace deals with ‍Arab countries and organizations. Those concessions have bought Israel no friends in the⁢ West Bank or Gaza Strip. Far from it: Concessions have generally emboldened Israel’s enemies.

That’s exactly what happened‌ in ‌Gaza.

In 2005, Israel pulled out of the Gaza Strip in an attempt to ​stop the costs⁢ in blood ⁢and ​treasure associated with policing the area.‌ All Jewish assets in the Gaza Strip‌ were promptly destroyed by Palestinian Arabs.

Elections were⁣ held in the Gaza⁣ Strip; Hamas was elected ⁣to lead and promptly consolidated their⁤ control by⁤ killing members of the⁢ Palestinian Authority. ‍They then stole as much international aid as they could to build rockets and terror infrastructure, ignored‌ the needs⁤ of their population entirely, and launched repeated rocket attacks on Israeli civilians.

WATCH: The Ben ⁣Shapiro Show

For the last two years or so, as Hamas themselves say,​ the organization attempted to deceive ⁤Israel into believing they had been deterred from large-scale terrorist action. Then,‍ on October 7, Simchat Torah, the happiest day on⁣ the Jewish calendar, at⁤ least 1,500 Hamas terrorists and even some “civilian” fellow travelers crossed the Israeli border by breaching the border wall around Gaza and killed some 1,200 Israelis in ​their beds at a music festival and elsewhere. They raped women, then murdered​ them ‍or‍ dragged them in captivity back to Gaza; they ⁤kidnapped or slaughtered babies.

Gaza and​ the⁣ West Bank are not⁢ filled with moderate Muslims. ‍Far⁣ from it. They are ‌filled ‍with people who ⁤despise the state ‍of Israel and agree⁢ wholeheartedly ⁢with Hamas’ ‍genocidal aims.

This is the entire problem: Were these areas filled with moderates, Israel might⁢ find a peace partner. That peace partner does not exist. ⁤As a⁣ new ‍poll from the Arab World for Research and ⁤Development (AWRAD) shows, 75%⁢ of‌ those polled in the‌ Gaza Strip and West Bank support⁢ the October 7 massacre; 76% support Hamas; 98% have a negative view of America; and⁤ 78% ‌believe in the total extermination of Israel.

As the old saw goes: If the Palestinians were to put down their arms tomorrow, ⁢they would have a ‌state; ⁣if Israel were to put down their arms tomorrow, ⁢they would all be ⁢dead.

CHECK OUT⁣ THE ⁤DAILY WIRE BLACK FRIDAY SHOPPING GUIDE

So,⁤ if the conflict is that clear-cut, then ‍why⁢ does it seem so complex?

The answer is a strategy undertaken by‌ the​ radical Muslim world, its far-Left allies, ⁤some‍ far-Right‍ allies, and the international media. It’s called baffling⁢ with bulls***.

Here’s how it works.

First, you construct institutions that‍ mirror your perspective, so as to create an echo ⁣chamber. For example, you take over or​ create pseudo-“human rights” organizations dedicated to promoting the anti-Israel point of view. Then you trot them out routinely in order to‍ claim that, despite all evidence, Israel is the ​ real threat to human rights.

How can ⁤you ⁢tell which “human rights” organizations‍ are biased and illegitimate? It’s⁣ not that hard:‍ If ⁤you’re a human rights organization, presumably you should have had ⁢some pretty strong condemnation of Hamas’ assault on Jews, the⁣ worst‌ since the Holocaust.

Here is a partial list of those who have been extraordinarily weak in their condemnations of Hamas or who have engaged in full-scale moral ⁤equivalence with Israel’s defensive actions in Gaza:

  • UNICEF Executive Director Catherine Russell
  • Amnesty International
  • WHO ⁢Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus
  • The International Committee ⁢of ⁤the Red Cross
  • U.N. High Commissioner on Human ‍Rights Volker Türk
  • The U.N. Relief⁤ and Works⁢ Agency
  • Save the Children
  • Doctors Without⁤ Borders
  • U.N. Special Rapporteur‌ Francesca Albanese
  • Human​ Rights Watch
  • Oxfam
  • Open‍ Society Foundations

And the​ list goes on and on.

This sort of attitude is extraordinarily common in the legacy media, as we’ve been detailing for weeks.

Once you have your mouthpieces, the true magic begins: ⁤You⁢ begin the baffling.

You⁢ obscure the main story entirely. Instead, ⁢you focus on details so as to avoid discussing the main story. You try to discredit a single detail from Israel, and⁢ then use it to suggest that ‍ everything emerging from Israel is false — despite the fact that Israel has a robust free press and routinely admits to mistakes and despite the even more ⁢obvious fact that Israel’s enemies routinely lie. That‍ lying is, in fact, a key component of their strategy.

Take, for example, MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan, a consistent propaganda opponent of Israel, dating back to his ​days at Al Jazeera. He suggested ​that because the Israeli government’s public relations team may have mislabeled a calendar in their ‌exposé on Hamas’ terror tunnels beneath ​Al-Shifa Hospital, this means⁤ that Israel is a totally unreliable ⁤source on everything.

Of course Al-Shifa was a⁣ military site. It was used ⁢as ‌such. There is surveillance footage from the day of the attacks showing ⁤terrorists ushering hostages into the hospital.

Medical personnel were standing ⁢there, who knew Hamas was operating from Al-Shifa. They worked with them. They then told the media lies about‌ it.

And the media ran​ with that story.

A witness from Al-Shifa even talked ​about how it was used as a base by Hamas.

Yet the big story, obviously, is ​whether a calendar on the wall of a ⁣terror tunnel kept track of terrorist hostage ‌handlers or not.

It’s not just Mehdi Hasan. It’s the usual⁢ suspects at CNN too. CNN⁤ reported over the weekend that the Israel Defense Forces, in showing​ the media the⁢ weaponry found at Al-Shifa, “might have rearranged weaponry” prior to exposing that weaponry to the media. The implication is that Israel ⁣was falsifying something. Which ⁢is absurd.⁣ Were Israel to leave all weaponry in ​place, that would be dangerous to the press, given booby traps have already killed or wounded a high number of Israeli soldiers.

GET 50% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS

We’ve seen this sort of⁣ game laundered into false accusations by pro-Hamas forces that real⁢ photos⁢ of burned babies are, instead, “AI generated” images; the insistence by‌ pro-Hamas propagandists that if babies were mostly burned alive rather than beheaded, this somehow means Israel is dishonest and Hamas is ⁤its moral equivalent;‍ and now, most ‌amazingly, that‍ Hamas didn’t even ‌conduct a massacre⁢ at⁣ all.

That’s ‌a contention making its way⁤ around‍ the‍ internet and the Arabic world thanks to⁢ a report from‍ Haaretz, a far-Left Israeli publication. ⁣That story from Haaretz states that according to Israeli officials, Hamas terrorists initially didn’t know about the ⁢music festival they ended up devastating — ​that instead, they “found out about the Nova‌ music festival through drones ⁢or from those flying in parachutes, and directed the⁤ terrorists to​ the location using their comms system.” ⁢That report also included a single unsourced police‍ allegation that an IDF helicopter targeting terrorists⁣ at ⁤the site “apparently harmed a few​ partygoers who were in the area.” The police have, by the way, denied ⁣the⁣ report, stating, “the police investigation does​ not refer to the activity of IDF forces and therefore no indication was given of harm to civilians as a result‍ of aerial activity at​ the site.”

Nonetheless, that report has now metastasized into the pro-Hamas allegation that Israel slaughtered its own citizens en masse. The ‍most viral X (Twitter) account on the site yesterday tweeted, “Will you CONDEMN⁤ ISRAEL⁤ NOW,‍ given they have ADMITTED to Haaretz (Israeli media)⁢ that ISRAELI HELICOPTERS MURDERED ⁣ISRAELI CIVILIANS on October‌ 7th?”

Yesterday, the Palestinian Authority ⁤— the supposed “moderate”‌ peace partner — announced that Israeli helicopters had killed all 364 ‌people​ at the music festival,​ citing the report in Haaretz. No surprise there: The leader of​ the PA, Mahmoud Abbas, is a full-scale⁢ Holocaust denier.

The ⁤baffling with bulls*** isn’t relegated to focusing​ on details, then ‍blowing them​ up into entire false narratives.​ It also extends to giving credence to ⁢total liars. That’s precisely why the legacy media claimed ​that Israel had bombed a ⁤hospital ⁢early in ⁣the conflict, when in actuality⁣ Palestinian Islamic Jihad had; why the legacy media have claimed each and⁣ every⁢ day that electricity was ⁣out at Al-Shifa, when‍ it wasn’t; and‍ why they have claimed ⁤that Israel is targeting civilians, ⁢when they ⁤are not.

In ⁤fact, as journalist‍ David Collier points out, ‌the media routinely use accounts from open terror supporters for their Gaza ⁤coverage: Dr.⁢ Khaled Abu Samra,⁢ who⁣ claimed‍ that Israel ⁣was‌ shooting at those waving white flags ⁤and posted that “history is being made”⁤ on October 7; Mohammed Abu Salmiya, director ‌of Al-Shifa Hospital, who routinely praises terrorists on his social media; Munir al-Borsh, director general of the Palestinian Health Ministry, ‌who claimed dogs were eating⁤ bodies of civilians ​and who is a part of the ⁢Hamas government.

There​ is one⁤ other element to baffling with bulls***: pretending you just don’t know⁣ enough to make a ⁤judgment between Israel and‍ their enemies. ⁢Who knows what’s true and what’s not? It’s just all too⁣ complicated to say. This allows journalists⁤ — who ⁤are supposed‍ to be focused on truth — to give ⁣equal credence ⁤to propagandists and ​truth-tellers.

“Both sides!” they cry, as they host​ people who openly call for the destruction of the state of Israel and ⁤valorize ‍Hamas.

It doesn’t take much to turn a clear ⁤narrative into a‌ muddy​ one.⁢ Just some lies, some laser-like focus on ‍irrelevant detail,‍ an⁤ echo chamber,‌ some shoulder-shrugging ignorance when questioned, and a lot‌ of radical and fellow travelers ‌to promote all​ that bulls***.

From these elements,⁢ truth can be turned ⁢to falsehood.

And we’re watching it ⁢happen in real time.

How does Reporters ⁢Without Borders manipulate the media narrative in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict?

400″>Reporters Without Borders

Second, you‌ manipulate the media narrative. ⁢You ⁣do this by seeding ⁤the⁣ media with biased narratives and false information. ‌For example, you accuse Israel of “war crimes” and ​”genocide”⁤ without any evidence to support such claims. You use emotional language and graphic images to evoke sympathy for Palestinians while ignoring the context and the fact that Hamas uses civilians as ‌human shields. You also ignore the fact that Israel goes to great lengths to⁤ minimize civilian casualties, even warning ​residents⁤ before military operations.

Third, you intimidate and marginalize anyone who dares to question the narrative. ‍⁤You ‍accuse them of being “racist,” “Islamophobic,” or “anti-Semitic.” You ⁤label any criticism of Hamas or support for Israel as “hate ⁣speech” or‍ “incitement to ‍violence.” You try to silence dissenting voices and⁢ create a climate of ‌fear and self-censorship.

Finally, you‌ appeal to the moral relativism ⁣and ⁤ignorance of the general public. ⁢You portray the conflict as a simple case of “oppressed Palestinians” versus “oppressive Israelis.” You ⁤ignore‍ the historical context, the ongoing threat of‍ terrorism,‍ and the refusal of Palestinian leaders to ‌accept ⁣peace offers. You​ exploit people’s empathy and desire for justice, while downplaying or distorting the facts.

The result of this strategy is a⁣ distorted and one-sided view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel is portrayed as the aggressor ⁤and ‌oppressor,⁢ while Hamas is‍ depicted as⁣ the oppressed and​ freedom fighter. The⁤ reality is far more complex⁣ and⁤ nuanced.

It is important⁢ to challenge and ⁢counter⁣ this strategy of baffling with bulls***. We need to expose the ⁢bias and distortion in ‍the media, ⁢support ‍organizations that‌ provide⁢ accurate and‌ balanced​ information, and encourage ⁢open and honest dialogue about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.⁢ Only then can‌ we hope ​to achieve a just and ​lasting peace in the region.

As for Hamas and its supporters, they need to be⁤ held accountable for their actions and ideology. Their goal of exterminating Israel and their use‌ of terrorism as a⁢ means to achieve it cannot be ignored or justified. We must condemn ⁣and ‍reject their extremism and ⁣work towards ⁢a peaceful resolution that respects the ​rights and security of both Israelis and Palestinians.


Read More From Original Article Here: Hamas And Its Media Allies Baffle With Bulls***

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker