Washington Examiner

Harris dances around what abortion restrictions she would accept – Washington Examiner

In a‍ recent interview, Vice President Kamala ⁣Harris avoided providing specifics on the abortion ‍restrictions‍ she would support if ‌elected as president. Instead, she ⁣focused on criticizing former President Donald Trump, alleging that he⁣ might pursue a⁣ nationwide⁤ abortion ban. Harris reaffirmed ‍her commitment to reinstating “Roe v. Wade” as law, emphasizing that it is⁤ a fundamental right ​for women to make decisions ⁢regarding‍ their own bodies. When pressed ​by CBS anchor Norah O’Donnell about Trump’s stance on abortion, ‍Harris redirected the conversation, attributing the current⁢ debate on restrictions to Trump’s nominations of conservative Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe in the “Dobbs ⁤v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization” ⁤case. Harris also pointed to policy proposals from the Heritage Foundation, suggesting they indicated Trump’s ⁤potential⁤ actions, while ​dismissing Trump’s claims to the contrary as inconsistent. Throughout ⁣the discussion, ​Harris maintained a critical tone ‌regarding Trump’s ⁢past statements and ⁢positions on abortion.


Harris dances around what abortion restrictions she would accept

Vice President Kamala Harris deflected questions about the specific abortion restrictions she would accept as president, instead redirecting the conversation back to claims that former President Donald Trump has denied, alleging that he would enact an abortion ban.

“I support Roe v. Wade being put back into law by Congress and to restore the fundamental right of women to make decisions about their own body,” Harris told CBS Sunday Morning. “It is that basic.”

When pressed again by anchor Norah O’Donnell, Harris pivoted the conversation, saying they would not even be “debating” restrictions if former President Donald Trump had not nominated three justices to the Supreme Court that decided Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the majority opinions of which repealed the Roe abortion precedent.

O’Donnell also pushed Harris on her claims that Trump would introduce a federal abortion ban, despite his counter-claims that he would not. In response, Harris referred O’Donnell to Project 2025, policy proposals from conservative think tank Heritage Foundation, which the former president had distanced himself from.

“He says everything. Come on. Are we really taking his word for it?” the vice president said. “He said that women should be punished. He has been all over the place on this, but I’m too busy watching what he’s doing to see what he has said.”

When O’Donnell reiterated that Trump has dismissed Project 2025 after Harris cited the Heritage Foundation’s entitlement program positions, the vice president similarly demurred.

“I am a former prosecutor. His DNA is all over it. All over it,” she said.

Last week, Harris was specifically asked about religious exemptions, a concession that could help her pass Women’s Health Protection Act through Congress if she is elected president on Nov. 5 because she will need Republican votes.

“I don’t think we should be making concessions when we’re talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body,” the vice president told NBC.

“I’m not gonna engage in hypotheticals because we could go on a variety of scenarios,” she said. “Let’s just start with a fundamental fact, a basic freedom has been taken from the women of America: the freedom to make decisions about their own body. And that cannot be negotiable, which is that we need to put back in the protections of Roe v Wade. And that is it.”



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker