No way, we won’t stop boycotting Bud Light
If you’re on the Right, then you know that the phrase “this is why we lose” has become something of a cliche.
If you’re a conservative, you’re probably familiar with the overused phrase “this is why we lose.” It’s our go-to response whenever someone on our side does something we disagree with, as if that person represents the downfall of American culture. Sometimes, this charge is exaggerated or unfounded. But not always.
So today we begin with an actual case of “this is why we lose.”
Today, I want to present a real example of why we conservatives sometimes lose. Recently, there has been a sudden push from some on the Right to rehabilitate Bud Light and convince conservatives to end the boycott against the company. While some notable figures, like Donald Trump Jr., never supported the boycott, the majority of conservatives did. However, that seems to be changing now.
This week, UFC president Dana White and Kid Rock appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show to express their renewed support for Bud Light. Other prominent voices, such as Tim Pool, have also defended their position.
WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show
Before we dive into their arguments, let’s be fair and listen to what they have to say.
First, let’s hear from Dana White:
I’ll share my thoughts on Dana’s argument later, but I want to point out one thing right away. Bud Light is owned by a foreign conglomerate. Setting aside everything else, it’s hard to argue that supporting a foreign company is “patriotic.” I’m not saying we can’t support foreign-owned brands, but it’s difficult to portray our support for a Belgian multinational corporation as an act of patriotism.
Now, let’s hear from Kid Rock, who also agrees with Dana:
Many people, including myself, find Kid Rock’s reasoning less than convincing.
However, Tim Pool believes we’re missing the point:
Before I explain why they’re all wrong, let me clarify that I respect these individuals. I like Dana White, Kid Rock, Tim Pool, and Tucker Carlson. They all have their merits. But the Bud Light boycott must continue, and here’s why.
Bud Light, a foreign-owned brand, tried to promote transgender ideology and disregarded its own customers. For once, conservatives fought back in an organized, effective manner. We launched a boycott and stuck with it. We made the woke company feel the consequences. We demonstrated our power in a way conservatives have rarely achieved.
The Bud Light boycott is not only the most effective conservative boycott of a major company, but it’s also the only successful one. We would need a compelling reason to end this victorious boycott. We would need a significant concession. But what have they offered? They gave Dana White $100 million. That’s not a concession or an apology; it’s a marketing tactic. Ending the boycott and supporting Bud Light because of their new marketing plan would be a retreat. It would be a defeat snatched from the jaws of victory, something the Right often does, but never as pathetically as this.
Now, in any boycott campaign, it’s important to give companies a way to redeem themselves. The purpose of a boycott is to extract concessions. If we succeed, we win. If we fail, the company suffers. So far, we’re winning in the latter way. Bud Light betrayed its customers and refused to admit defeat, resulting in the company’s downfall. That’s how it should be.
What can Bud Light do to end this boycott? They need to apologize for
Is it hypocritical for conservatives to boycott Bud Light while other beer companies also support liberal causes?
Convincing. He argues that the boycott against Bud Light is hypocritical because other beer companies, such as MillerCoors, are also supportive of liberal causes. While it’s true that other companies may hold left-leaning views, this doesn’t mean conservatives should support a company that goes against their values.
The essence of conservatism is to uphold principles and values that align with limited government, individual liberty, and moral values. Supporting businesses that promote opposite values undermines the conservative cause. It’s not about being hypocritical; it’s about being principled.
Furthermore, the argument that supporting Bud Light will lead to a better political climate is flawed. Bud Light is a beer company, not a political entity. By associating our political views with a beverage, we diminish the importance of serious policy discussions. It’s more effective to focus on promoting conservative ideas and principles through meaningful dialogues and productive actions.
Ultimately, the push to end the boycott against Bud Light reveals a broader issue within the conservative movement. It highlights a tendency to prioritize short-term gains, such as corporate endorsements or popularity among certain figures, over long-term values and principles. This approach undermines the ability to implement lasting change and win ideological battles.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...