Kissinger’s final warning to the West: Ignoring it may be fatal
Henry Kissinger’s Last Warning to the West Could Prove Deadly if Ignored
Love Henry Kissinger or hate him, media outlets were all unanimous in praising the efficacy of the former secretary of state’s pragmatic approach to geopolitics when he died Wednesday at age 100.
And yet they’ll probably ignore one of Kissinger’s last pieces of advice to the West — particularly as it pertains to anti-Semitism, pro-Palestinian activism, and the dangers of mass migration.
In early October, just a month and a half before he died and days after the Oct. 7 Hamas terror attacks, he told Axel Springer CEO Mathias Döpfner in an interview for Germany’s Welt TV that celebrations of the Hamas attack in Berlin were the result of mass migration into the country.
“I do not have a grievance against the German people,” Kissinger told Döpfner. “I find celebrations about what happened — which technically was a sort of criminal act — as painful.”
“It was a grave mistake to let in so many people of totally different culture and religion and concepts, because it creates a pressure group inside each country that does that,” he said.
That statement came during an interview where the diplomat said Hamas’ “open act of aggression” meant they needed to face “some penalty,” although he cautioned about the delicate peace that had prevailed in that corner of the world.
“The Middle East conflict has the danger of escalating and bringing in other Arab countries under the pressure of their public opinion,” Kissinger said.
Hamas’ goal, he said, “can only be to mobilize the Arab world against Israel and to get off the track of peaceful negotiations.”
However, his piece of advice that most of the media won’t mention is the idea that Germany had been poisoned by bringing in migrants whose values ran against the stated values of the society in which they’re living.
It’s not just Berlin. Let’s face it: Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen what are ostensibly pro-Hamas protests in many of the West’s largest cities:
BREAKING: The Met Police have arrested a man near the start of the pro-Palestinian march in central London, on suspicion of inciting racial hatred
Israel-Hamas latest: https://t.co/qB526AJwWg
Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/qJOgTQkq0B
— Sky News (@SkyNews) November 25, 2023
IGNORANT JERKS!—pro-terrorist HAMAS supporters Stopping Traffic with their “March” the wrong way down Third Avenue in New York City. Not Peaceful! Not legal! Not Smart! pic.twitter.com/IxeYOjkll3
— Greg Kelly (@gregkellyusa) May 18, 2021
Of course, most of these parades were driven largely by activists who are probably Germans, Britons, or Americans.
However, in Germany — where anti-Semitism carries the stigma of a link with the Nazi regime — seeing this level of pro-Hamas protests in the capital is a disturbing sight indeed.
And, keep in mind, this isn’t the only problem Germany has faced on the migrant front; trump-is-more
Why does Kissinger view allowing a large number of people with different backgrounds as a clash of cultures and values?
Those of the country. Kissinger believed that mass migration of individuals with different cultures, religions, and concepts creates pressure groups within each country, which can lead to social tensions and conflicts.
In the interview, Kissinger expressed his concern over the celebrations of the Hamas attack in Berlin, calling it a painful reminder of the consequences of mass migration. He saw it as a grave mistake to allow the entry of a large number of people with different backgrounds, as it creates a clash of cultures and values.
The diplomat warned about the danger of escalating the Middle East conflict and the potential involvement of other Arab countries under the pressure of their public opinion. He believed that Hamas’ goal was to mobilize the Arab world against Israel and derail peaceful negotiations.
Kissinger’s warning should not be taken lightly. Throughout history, the clash of cultures and the influx of migrants with conflicting ideologies have often been the cause of social unrest and political instability. Ignoring this warning could have devastating consequences for the West.
The issue of migration and its impact on society is highly debated and controversial. While some argue for open borders and multiculturalism, others emphasize the importance of preserving national identity and values. Kissinger’s stance reminds us to consider the consequences of unchecked mass migration and to find a balance between humanitarian concerns and national stability.
It is crucial to discuss and address the challenges posed by mass migration openly and honestly. This includes acknowledging the potential risks and working towards effective integration policies that promote social cohesion, respect for the host country’s values, and the well-being of both migrants and the native population.
Henry Kissinger’s pragmatic approach to geopolitics has earned him praise and recognition throughout his career. His final warning about the dangers of mass migration and the impact it can have on a society should not be dismissed. Instead, it should serve as a reminder to carefully consider the long-term implications of immigration policies and strive for a balanced approach that takes into account both humanitarian considerations and national interests.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...