Hillary Clinton questions legitimacy of 2024 election, predicts repetition.
The Establishment’s Favorite Foreign Bogeyman: Hillary Clinton Continues to Sound the Alarm on Election Interference
Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton is still haunted by the specter of Russian President Vladimir Putin. In a recent interview on MSNBC’s ”Inside with Jen Psaki,” Clinton expressed her fear that Putin interfered in the 2016 election and warned that he could do it again in 2024.
“I fear that the Russians have proved themselves to be quite adept at interfering and if he has a chance, he’ll do it again.”@HillaryClinton on Putin’s potential election interference in 2024 pic.twitter.com/wW5FXBvF4J
— Inside with Jen Psaki (@InsideWithPsaki) September 24, 2023
While Clinton’s concerns about election interference are well-known, it is worth noting that both Democrats and establishment Republicans often discuss this issue even when there is no evidence of it. On the other hand, those who dare to speak out about real instances of interference face censorship and legal persecution.
Clinton’s ability to deny her involvement in fabricating the Russian collusion narrative is a testament to the double standards at play. She can freely spread falsehoods about Putin and Russia without facing any consequences, thanks in part to the complicity of figures like Psaki, who serve as mouthpieces for the establishment.
During the interview, Psaki teed up questions that allowed Clinton to perpetuate her lies and hypocrisy. She asked about Putin’s potential interference in the 2024 election and whether it should be discussed more. Clinton took nearly three minutes to respond, reiterating her belief that Putin interfered in the 2016 election and emphasizing his track record of meddling in other countries’ affairs.
Clinton’s portrayal of Putin as an authoritarian dictator who poses a threat to democracy conveniently aligns with the establishment’s narrative. However, it is important to recognize that the establishment itself engages in similar tactics, such as indicting opponents and suppressing dissenting voices.
While Clinton and other establishment figures can freely discuss election interference and authoritarianism, anyone who questions the legitimacy of an election risks being silenced. The powerful will go to great lengths to maintain their grip on power, even if it means disregarding the principles of democracy.
A Distorted Narrative
The establishment’s obsession with the Russian bogeyman serves a purpose: it allows them to divert attention from their own actions and maintain control over the dissemination of information. They rely on federal agencies, Big Tech, Hollywood, universities, and the media to spread their preferred narrative.
On the other hand, those who voted for former President Donald Trump, who represent a significant portion of the population, have little institutional power and must seek alternative sources of information. They have been lied to by the establishment for years and understand the need to look beyond the mainstream channels.
Despite the establishment’s efforts to paint Russian interference as a decisive factor in the 2016 election, the reality is far more nuanced. Russian sources spent a mere $100,000 on Facebook ads, a fraction of the establishment’s influence over the narrative. Yet, this relatively small amount is used to justify the ongoing obsession with Russian interference.
Furthermore, Putin’s actions during Trump’s presidency contradict the establishment’s claims. Rather than taking advantage of Trump’s tenure, Putin waited until after his presidency to invade Ukraine. This inconsistency raises questions about the true motives behind the establishment’s fixation on Russia.
Ultimately, the continued focus on the Russian bogeyman serves the establishment’s interests by distracting from their own misdeeds and perpetuating a distorted narrative. While they accuse others of election interference and authoritarianism, they themselves engage in similar behavior without facing any consequences.
A Note from Our Founder:
Every morning, we at The Western Journal wake up and pursue our mission of giving you the important information you need about what’s happening in America.
We can’t do that without your help.
America has been on the receiving end of false narratives. The purpose of these false narratives is to make you feel powerless. The Western Journal empowers you by breaking these false narratives.
Please stand with us by donating today.
The post Hillary Clinton Is Already Casting Doubt on 2024 Election Legitimacy: ‘He’ll Do It Again’ appeared first on The Western Journal.
How does focusing on a foreign bogeyman distract from addressing pressing concerns such as economic inequality, healthcare, and climate change?
The total campaign spending. It is unlikely that these ads had a significant impact on the election outcome. Yet, the establishment continues to push this narrative, using it as an excuse to clamp down on dissenting voices and justify their own actions.
The Danger of Fearmongering
By perpetuating the fear of Russian interference, the establishment creates a climate of fear and distrust among the population. This fearmongering allows them to justify increased surveillance, censorship, and control over the electoral process. It undermines the principles of democracy and erodes the trust of the people in the democratic process.
Furthermore, this focus on a foreign bogeyman distracts from the real issues plaguing the country. It diverts attention from economic inequality, healthcare, climate change, and other pressing concerns. It serves as a convenient scapegoat that allows the establishment to avoid addressing these issues and maintain the status quo.
The Need for Transparency
If the establishment truly values democracy and election integrity, it should prioritize transparency and accountability. Instead of perpetuating baseless claims of foreign interference, it should focus on securing the electoral process, ensuring the accuracy of voter rolls, and promoting fair and open elections.
Transparency is the key to restoring trust in the electoral process. The establishment must be held accountable for its actions and be transparent about its own interference in elections, both foreign and domestic. Only then can we have a truly democratic system that reflects the will of the people.
Conclusion
Hillary Clinton’s continued focus on Russian interference in the 2016 election is a prime example of the establishment’s favorite foreign bogeyman. It serves as a distraction from the real issues facing the country and allows the establishment to maintain control over the narrative and the democratic process. It is crucial for the people to question and challenge this narrative, demand transparency and accountability, and work towards a truly democratic system that represents the interests of all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
