Washington Examiner

House conservatives demand answers before considering stopgap spending measure.

Conservative House Freedom Caucus Demands Answers Before Supporting Stopgap Spending Measure

Members of the conservative House ‍Freedom Caucus have taken a firm stance against supporting a stopgap spending measure to avert a government shutdown this weekend. In a letter ⁣addressed to Speaker Kevin ⁢McCarthy (R-CA), the caucus outlined several⁣ pressing​ questions that must be answered before they even consider backing the measure.

Urgent Questions for Speaker McCarthy

  • What is the‌ time frame for the remaining ⁣five spending bills?
  • Will⁣ the House⁤ stay in session until all bills are passed ⁢individually?
  • Will you publicly ‌reject​ the bipartisan continuing resolution proposal?
  • How ‌do you plan⁢ to ‍reduce spending⁤ levels to reach the negotiated⁣ top-line number?

The lawmakers emphasized that ​they‌ cannot be expected to support a ⁣stopgap funding measure without satisfactory answers to ‍these reasonable questions. ​They expressed their willingness ⁤to work in good faith with their colleagues‌ to advance appropriations but expect McCarthy to take the⁤ necessary steps to pass the bills, starting with the four currently under⁢ consideration.

The House is set to vote‍ on four‌ appropriations ⁢bills covering various ​departments, including Defense, Homeland Security, State and Foreign Operations, and Agriculture. If passed, ​this would bring the total number of appropriations bills passed by the House to five out of twelve.

While McCarthy’s plan includes ‌a continuing resolution and a‌ temporary spending‍ measure, ⁤it faces opposition from hard-line conservatives. Even if ⁤the questions are addressed, there ⁤may still be enough ​GOP “no” votes to sink the stopgap​ measure.

With ‌the deadline approaching, Congress must ‍pass spending legislation by midnight on Sunday to avoid a government shutdown. However, neither the House nor the Senate has made significant progress on their appropriations bills⁢ or a stopgap ‌measure,⁣ increasing​ the likelihood‌ of a partial shutdown.

McCarthy intends to‍ bring a ⁤temporary spending measure to the floor by Friday, setting a top line at $1.471 trillion. This ‌proposal⁣ includes the House’s border⁤ security bill⁣ and a fiscal commission to address the government’s debt. However, without ⁣Democratic support, it is unlikely to pass in the lower chamber.

Meanwhile, the Senate is preparing ⁣to vote on ​a stopgap spending⁤ measure ⁣negotiated between Republicans and Democrats. This proposal includes ‌disaster funding and Ukrainian‍ aid but ⁢is expected to face opposition in​ the House.

It remains to be seen how these developments will unfold and whether a resolution can be reached before the government runs out of funding.

Source: The Washington ⁤Examiner

⁢How ⁢does ‍a blanket resolution undermine the necessary​ scrutiny and oversight for responsible governance?

⁤ Ng⁤ measure without‌ first receiving‌ satisfactory answers to these questions. They argue that ⁤without ⁢a clear plan and timeline ‌for​ passing⁣ the remaining spending bills, the House risks ‌rushing through⁣ legislation that has not been thoroughly reviewed, potentially resulting in wasteful or inefficient spending.

The conservative‍ House Freedom Caucus has consistently championed fiscal responsibility⁤ and limited ⁤government intervention. They believe that passing​ stopgap measures only perpetuates the cycle of overspending and failure to address the root causes of the nation’s fiscal challenges. Therefore, they⁢ are‌ demanding concrete plans⁣ to reduce spending levels and ensure that all⁢ spending bills are ‌individually debated and passed.

One of the key concerns raised in their‌ letter is the bipartisan continuing resolution‌ proposal. ⁢The lawmakers ⁢ask Speaker‍ McCarthy to publicly reject this proposal,‍ as they argue⁤ that it would undermine‍ their ​efforts to carefully consider ⁤each spending bill on its ‍own merits.​ They believe⁤ that a blanket resolution would not allow for the necessary scrutiny and ⁣oversight that is essential ⁣for responsible governance.

The demand for a clear⁣ time frame for the ‍remaining five spending bills⁢ is also crucial. Without this information, the House ‍Freedom Caucus feels that their ability to make informed⁣ decisions and ⁣provide⁣ proper oversight is compromised. They argue that⁤ rushing through legislation‌ without adequate time for⁢ review and debate undermines the principles of transparency and accountability⁢ that should be at the core of ⁤the legislative process.

Furthermore, the caucus is seeking a commitment from Speaker McCarthy that the House‍ will stay in session until all⁤ bills are passed individually. In their view, it is not enough to ​simply pass a stopgap ‍measure‌ and then move on. They ⁢believe that each spending ⁤bill deserves‌ its ⁤own thorough consideration, and​ that members of Congress ⁢cannot shirk their responsibility to scrutinize and‌ debate the appropriations process.

The​ conservative House Freedom Caucus’s demands‍ are driven by their commitment to conservative⁣ principles ​and their belief in responsible governance. They argue that these questions‌ must be ‍answered before they can offer their support for any stopgap⁤ spending⁤ measure. By‌ demanding clarity, accountability, and a commitment to reducing ​spending, they ‌aim to ensure that taxpayer dollars are used wisely and efficiently.

In conclusion, the conservative House Freedom Caucus’s firm stance against supporting a stopgap spending measure is based on their demand ‍for answers to pressing questions regarding the⁣ remaining spending⁣ bills, the ⁢rejection of​ bipartisan‌ continuing resolution proposals, and a commitment to reducing ‍spending. They argue that these requirements are‌ essential for​ responsible governance and the prudent use of taxpayer dollars. The‍ caucus’s stance⁢ highlights the ‌importance of fiscal responsibility and limited government intervention, and serves as a reminder that Congress must uphold these principles in the face of pressing budgetary challenges.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker