House Dem Threatens Reconciliation Over HBCU Funding
Democratic North Carolina Rep. Alma Adams is the latest member of her party to threaten President Joe Biden’s $3.5 trillion Build Back Better Act.
“We can’t build back better unless we build our HBCUs [Historically Black Colleges and Universities] back better. Promises made must be promises kept,” Adams, a co-chair of the HBUC Caucus told Punchbowl News on Friday. She is reportedly willing to hold up the entire package over its funding levels for HBCUs.
Biden promised $55 billion to HBCUs when he announced his American Jobs Plan on March 31 as part of his government-wide focus on racial equity. However, committee markups of the Build Back Better Act allocated only $2 billion to HBCUs, The Washington Post reported.
Adams, a graduate of North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University and former professor at Bennett College, repeatedly called for increased HBCU funding via Twitter.
46% of facilities on #HBCU Campuses need repair or replacement. We can’t #BuildBackBetter unless the final reconciliation package includes billions of dollars in dedicated funding to repair, replace, and enhance infrastructure at Historically Black Colleges and Universities.
— Rep. Alma Adams (@RepAdams) September 16, 2021
300,000 #HBCU students and thousands of faculty and staff at Historically Black Colleges and Universities deserve the same opportunities as their counterparts at predominately white institutions. Let’s fix that in the #BuildBackBetter Act.
— Rep. Alma Adams (@RepAdams) September 16, 2021
“We must ensure that HBCUs receive a fair and equitable piece of the pie,” she told The Washington Post on Sept. 10. “We cannot repeat mistakes that have been made in other federal programs where they are forced to compete with institutions that do not share the same legacy of discrimination and neglect.”
Adams did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller’s request for comment.
Adams joins a growing list of House Democrats who have threatened to oppose the Build Back Better Act. Also Friday, four New Jersey Democrats, Josh Gottheimer, Mikie Sherrill, Bill Pascrell and Tom Malinowski pledged to oppose reconciliation unless the package includes a full repeal of the State and Local Tax deduction cap. Progressives led by New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have opposed eliminating the cap since doing so would primarily benefit wealthier residents.
Today, I joined @BillPascrell, @RepSherrill, @RepMalinowksi, Englewood Mayor @Michael_Wildes & NJ homeowners to call for SALT to be reinstated — we will only vote for a reconciliation package on the House floor that reinstates SALT.
Hardworking NJ families need tax cuts now. pic.twitter.com/Ei5ybwtC73
— Rep Josh Gottheimer (@RepJoshG) September 17, 2021
Florida Rep. Stephanie Murphy said Sept. 9 that she could not support provisions of the package in the Ways and Means Committee unless she sees the “bill in its entirety.” Keeping with her promise, Murphy was the only Democrat who voted against advancing the bill from committee Thursday.
She called on the final bill to be “appropriately targeted and fiscally responsible.”
The House Energy and Commerce Committee blocked a provision of the reconciliation package that would have created a price control mechanism for prescription drugs after three committee Democrats voted with all 26 Republicans. Biden, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, and left-wing members of the Democratic caucus had pushed the provision, arguing that it would lower healthcare costs, but opponents expressed concern that it would harm innovation. (RELATED: Biden Pushes Congress To Lower Cost Of Prescription Drugs)
In the Senate, West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin told CNN on Sept. 12 that Majority Leader Chuck Schumer “will not have my vote on $3.5 trillion, and Chuck knows that.” A Wednesday Oval Office meeting with Biden reportedly did nothing to sway Manchin, who has previously said that $1.5 trillion is the most money he could support.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...