House approves bill reversing Biden’s ‘America last’ labor agenda

The House⁣ of Representatives Votes to Roll Back ⁤NLRB Rule on Joint-Employer Status

The House of Representatives made a significant‍ move on Friday, voting 206-177 to overturn⁤ a rule established by the National Labor ​Relations‌ Board (NLRB) that redefines joint-employer status. This ⁤rule, which was finalized​ last year, sets new standards ⁢for determining the relationship between companies and third-party employers.

Sponsored by Rep. John James‍ (R-MI), H.J.Res. 98, the joint resolution that struck down the ⁤NLRB’s new standards, passed mostly⁢ along party⁣ lines.⁤ However, it is worth noting that eight Democrats joined Republicans in supporting the resolution.

While⁢ the vote holds ​symbolic value, it remains uncertain whether the ⁤Senate will take up the⁤ legislation. Additionally, President Joe ‍Biden has already expressed his intention to veto the bill if it​ reaches his desk.

The Impact of Biden’s Rule on Workers and Businesses

The⁢ Biden administration’s rule ​undermines the standards established by former President Donald Trump in 2020. If implemented, it ​would make it easier for⁤ millions of workers to unionize by redefining the criteria for joint-employer status. The rule was scheduled to take effect at the end of February.

During his speech before the vote, Rep. James criticized the NLRB’s rule as part of Biden’s regulatory agenda, which he ⁣believes unfairly prioritizes labor and harms small businesses. He emphasized the importance of job ​creators and entrepreneurs in driving economic growth and argued that overturning the joint-employer ‍rule is just the first step in the right ⁣direction.

Concerns and ​Opposition to the NLRB Rule

Opponents of the ⁤NLRB rule have raised concerns about its potential ⁢negative​ impact. While they generally support joint-employer standards, they argue that the new provisions ‌defining “indirect” ⁤and “reserve” control of employee⁤ conditions are overly broad. They fear ⁣that this​ could expose small ‍businesses, including franchisees and independent contractors, to unwarranted labor lawsuits and ultimately lead to⁣ the closure of many‌ small businesses across the country.

The White House has not ⁣yet commented on the House’s passage of H.J.Res. 98.​ However, in a statement issued on January 8, President Biden’s administration emphasized the importance of workers’ rights to fair‍ wages and working conditions. They argued that reversing the⁤ NLRB rule would hinder workers’ ability to negotiate ⁤for better pay, benefits, and safer workplaces, ultimately resulting in lower ⁤wages for working families.

For‍ more information on this topic, you⁢ can read the full article from the⁣ Washington Examiner ⁣ here.

What‌ were the ​House ​Republicans’ main arguments for overturning the NLRB ⁤rule on joint employment, and how do they believe⁢ it would impact businesses and ​economic growth?

Oe Biden​ has not indicated whether ‍he would sign ⁢the resolution if it reaches his desk.⁤⁤ However, the House Republicans’ effort to roll back the ⁤NLRB rule reflects their continuing commitment to reducing government regulation and providing more‌ flexibility for businesses.

The NLRB’s rule, known as the Browning-Ferris standard, was established in⁣ 2015⁣ and expanded the definition of joint employment. Under this rule, ⁢a company could ⁤be considered a‍ joint employer if it had indirect⁤ control or the ​potential to exert control over another company’s employees. This expanded definition had significant implications⁣ for labor relations, as it made it easier for workers to hold multiple employers responsible for labor law violations, such as⁣ wage theft and unfair labor practices.

The House Republicans’ argument for overturning the ⁤NLRB rule focused on ⁣the potential negative impact ⁢it had on businesses. They claimed that ⁣the expanded definition of joint employment ⁤created uncertainty and discouraged companies from entering into contractor or franchise agreements. They argued that⁢ this uncertainty hindered economic growth and limited job opportunities.

The vote in the House of Representatives to roll ⁣back the ⁤NLRB ​rule is part of⁣ a broader effort by Republicans to reverse labor policies implemented during the Obama administration. Under the Trump administration, the NLRB had already ⁤begun reconsidering the Browning-Ferris standard and proposed‌ a new rule that would have⁢ narrowed the definition of joint employment. However, this proposed rule⁤ was later withdrawn.

Many labor advocates and Democrats criticized the House Republicans’ move, arguing that it prioritized corporate interests over workers’ rights. They argued that the Browning-Ferris standard was necessary to protect ‍workers and ensure that employers could not escape their responsibility to provide fair⁣ wages and working conditions. They ​also contended that overturning the rule would further exacerbate income inequality and erode⁣ collective bargaining rights.

As the joint resolution now ⁣moves to the ‌Senate, it remains⁣ unclear whether it will gain enough support to pass. If ‌it does, ‍it will then need to be signed by President Biden, who has not taken a definitive stance on ⁣the issue. The ‌future of the NLRB’s rule ​on joint-employer status ⁢is uncertain, but the House Republicans’ efforts highlight their commitment to deregulation and their desire to provide businesses with more‌ flexibility in their employment practices. The outcome of this resolution will have significant implications for both workers and ⁢employers across various industries, making ⁣it a topic of great importance in the ‌ongoing debate over labor policy in the United States.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases