House refuses to halt cluster bomb shipments to Ukraine.
The House of Representatives Rejects Amendment to Stop Sending Cluster Munitions to Ukraine
In a recent vote, the House of Representatives decided against an amendment that would have halted the United States’ shipment of cluster munitions to Ukrainian forces. The amendment, introduced by Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), aimed to put an end to the provision of cluster munitions in future aid packages to Ukraine. Unfortunately, the amendment failed to pass, with a vote of 160–269.
Interestingly, the effort to block cluster bombs for Ukraine received support from both House Republicans and House Democrats. Eighty-five Republicans and 75 Democrats backed the amendment, while 132 Republicans and 137 Democrats opposed it.
Related Stories
Cluster munitions are highly controversial due to their indiscriminate nature. These bombs and artillery shells break apart in mid-air, scattering smaller submunitions over a wide area. The problem arises when these submunitions fail to explode upon impact and remain dormant for years, posing a threat to innocent civilians who may encounter them.
It is worth noting that 112 nations are party to the U.N. Convention on Cluster Munitions, which prohibits the use, transfer, production, and stockpiling of these weapons. However, the United States is among the 16 countries that produce cluster munitions and have chosen not to join the U.N. treaty.
President Joe Biden’s administration approved the transfer of U.S. cluster munitions to Ukraine in July, under the condition that they would only be used within Ukraine’s borders and that the Ukrainian government would commit to post-conflict de-mining efforts. The administration argued that Russian forces had already been using cluster munitions in Ukraine, and the U.S. munitions had a lower failure rate compared to those used by Russia.
This is not the first time Rep. Matt Gaetz has attempted to stop the transfer of cluster munitions. He previously supported a similar effort led by Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.), but both attempts have been unsuccessful.
The debate surrounding cluster munitions continues to be a contentious issue, with supporters arguing for their necessity in Ukraine’s fight against Russian aggression, while opponents emphasize the devastating consequences and the erosion of the United States’ moral authority.
Ultimately, the rejection of the amendment raises questions about the future use and supply of cluster munitions, not only in Ukraine but also in potential conflicts involving other allies and partners of the United States.
From NTD News
Why has the provision of cluster munitions to Ukraine been a contentious issue since the conflict with Russia began?
Weapons are designed to release multiple smaller explosives over a wide area, making them particularly dangerous to civilians. The use of cluster munitions has been widely condemned by the international community, with many countries and organizations advocating for their complete prohibition.
The provision of cluster munitions to Ukraine has been a contentious issue since the conflict with Russia began. Proponents argue that the munitions are necessary for Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression, while opponents argue that their use puts innocent civilians at risk. The amendment introduced by Rep. Matt Gaetz sought to address these concerns by stopping the shipment of cluster munitions to Ukrainian forces.
The fact that the amendment received support from both Republicans and Democrats demonstrates the bipartisan concern over the issue. It shows that there is a growing recognition among lawmakers that the use of cluster munitions is fundamentally at odds with American values and international humanitarian law. The amendment’s failure to pass can be seen as a missed opportunity to take a principled stand against the use of these indiscriminate weapons.
Critics of the decision argue that the continued provision of cluster munitions to Ukraine not only perpetuates the suffering of civilians caught in the conflict but also undermines America’s credibility as a champion of human rights and international law. They argue that the United States should lead by example and refuse to support or endorse the use of such weapons.
It is worth noting that this issue is not unique to the United States. Other countries, including Russia, have also been criticized for their use of cluster munitions in conflicts. However, as a global superpower and a leading advocate for human rights, the actions of the United States carry significant weight. By continuing to provide cluster munitions to Ukrainian forces, the United States risks being seen as complicit in the harm caused by these weapons.
The vote in the House of Representatives reflects the difficult choices faced by lawmakers when it comes to foreign policy and military aid. Balancing the need to support allies and promote stability with the imperative to protect innocent lives is a complex task. However, it is important to remember that our values and principles should guide our decisions and actions. The use of cluster munitions, with their devastating impact on civilians, is contrary to these principles and should be firmly rejected.
As the conflict in Ukraine continues, it is crucial that we continue to scrutinize and question the decisions made by our elected officials. The provision of cluster munitions is just one example of the larger issues at stake in the conflict. By holding our representatives accountable and demanding that they act in accordance with our shared values, we can work towards a more peaceful and just world.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...