House Republicans hit back at Alvin Bragg’s refusal to testify in Trump case

Top Republican leaders in the House fired back at Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg over his refusal to testify before Congress about his investigation into former President Donald Trump, giving the New York official until the end of the month to comply with their request.

Democratic lawmakers responded to the district attorney’s legal claims that he claimed prevented him from providing material into the ongoing investigation in an eight-page email sent to Bragg on Saturday. These claims were refuted by the GOP leaders, who noted that his cooperation was essential to” protect former and / or current presidents from politically motivated prosecutions.”

TRUMP CREATED A” Fake Desire” THAT HE WOULD BE ARRESTED, ALVIN BRAGG SAYS.

The lawmakers wrote,” Notably, your reply letter did not dispute the central allegations at issue — that you are reportedly planning to use an alleged federal campaign finance violation— previously rejected by federal prosecutors — to extend the statute of limitations on an otherwise misdemeanor offense and indict a former President of the United States for the first time in history.

Jim Jordan, chairman of the House Judiciary, James Comer, president of House Oversight, and home administrator Bryan Steil all signed the letter.

The district attorney’s earlier claims that the results of his investigation are classified under state law were rejected in the GOP response, which outlined many arguments that forced Bragg to cooperate with their demand for testimony and documents.

The lawmakers cited House guidelines that mainly give the Judiciary Committee lapse of criminal justice issues in order to notify future legislation, arguing that boards are authorized to carry out such an inquiry. The politicians stated that gathering information on Bragg’s way is crucial to preventing local prosecutors from harming supporters of their opposing party.

The text begins by stating that, as was already mentioned, Congress has a special and obviously significant interest in preventing elected state and local prosecutors from prosecuting current and former presidents for political reasons. As a result, the Committee on the Judiciary may now decide whether to enlist policy that would shield current and former presidents from such poor state and local prosecutions as part of its broad authority to develop legal justice legislation.

Bragg also rejected a parliamentary investigation, citing the 10th Amendment, which forbids national politicians from interfering in state-level decisions. A case that seeks to indict a former president” implicates significant federal interests ,” the GOP leaders noted as they pushed back on that claim.

The pair wrote,” Needless to say, our monitoring demands do no such thing, and they would never prevent you from carrying out any prosecution.” Instead, we’re just looking for information to fulfill our legal obligations.

Jordan, Comer, and Steil gave Bragg until March 31 to comply with their repeated requests for evidence and analytical products at the end of the email. What might happen to Bragg if he doesn’t comply with the request is unclear.

The demand has been resurrected as Bragg is apparently getting ready to prosecute Trump sometime next week as part of an inquiry into the hush-money purchases the previous leader made during his first battle in 2016. If charged, it would be the first time in American history that a previous leader has been charged. Trump has insisted, however, that even if he is detained and imprisoned, his political system will go on.

Trump’s potential charges are still unknown, but earlier this month, reports of a potential following surfaced following the testimony of his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, before the Manhattan grand jury.

TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER, CLICK HERE.

Cohen was found guilty in 2018 after admitting to paying Stormy Daniels and two other women who accused Trump of having sex with him to keep quiet. Cohen paid Daniels$ 30,000 as part of the plan, and was thereafter paid back by the Trump Organization.

Later, Manhattan prosecutors launched an inquiry into the possibility that Trump fabricated business records in order to claim the insurance as a lawful expense. If Bragg’s work claims the forgery was done to cover up a second offense, the misdemeanor status of the crime in New York may be raised to felony status.