No Speaker chosen today: Does Scalise have enough votes to win?
If Chaos Reigns, the House Still Needs a Speaker
If the world’s descent into chaos and madness had led us to forget, Wednesday brought a reminder that the House of Representatives still needs a speaker.
According to CNN, that need will extend at least into Thursday, as the House voted to recess at 3 p.m. EST.
Earlier Wednesday, Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana won a narrow, closed-door vote and became the Republican nominee for speaker, but that vote by no means guarantees his election even in a GOP-controlled House.
For one thing, Scalise prevailed over Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio by a margin of only 113-99. That margin reflects clear divisions inside the party.
Jordan, at least, has pledged to support Scalise.
“We need a speaker, and Steve is the guy for that. Like I said, I have offered to give a nominating speech for him,” Jordan said.
Other GOP members, however, have expressed continued support for Jordan, whom they perceive as least beholden to the loathsome establishment.
In fact, several GOP dissidents took to social media on Wednesday to explain their vote.
“I will be voting for Jim Jordan to be Speaker of the House on the floor when the vote is called. In conference, Jordan received 99 votes and Scalise received 113,” Rep. Lauren Boebert of Colorado wrote Wednesday on X, formerly Twitter.
“We had a chance to unify the party behind closed doors, but the Swamp and K Street lobbyists prevented that. The American people deserve a real change in leadership, not a continuation of the status quo,” she added.
I will be voting for Jim Jordan to be Speaker of the House on the floor when the vote is called.
In conference, Jordan received 99 votes and Scalise received 113.
We had a chance to unify the party behind closed doors, but the Swamp and K Street lobbyists prevented that.
The…
— Lauren Boebert (@laurenboebert) October 11, 2023
Rep. Bob Good of Virginia echoed Boebert’s sentiments.
“I voted for Jim Jordan in the Republican Conference today. I also voted for us to stay in conference until someone gets the required support of 217. No one received a majority of 221 eligible voting members,” Good posted.
Therefore, he added, “I am still supporting Jordan. The country cannot afford the status quo.”
I voted for Jim Jordan in the Republican Conference today. I also voted for us to stay in conference until someone gets the required support of 217. No one received a majority of 221 eligible voting members. I am still supporting Jordan. The country cannot afford the status quo.
— Congressman Bob Good (@RepBobGood) October 11, 2023
As part of a lengthier post, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia urged Scalise to focus on his health.
“I just voted for Jim Jordan for Speaker on a private ballot in conference, and I will be voting for Jim Jordan on the House floor. I like Steve Scalise, and I like him so much that I want to see him defeat cancer more than sacrifice his health in the most difficult position in Congress,” Greene wrote.
I just voted for Jim Jordan for Speaker on a private ballot in conference, and I will be voting for Jim Jordan on the House floor.
I like Steve Scalise, and I like him so much that I want to see him defeat cancer more than sacrifice his health in the most difficult position in…
— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) October 11, 2023
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida, on the other hand, got right to the point.
“Jim Jordan,” she wrote.
Jim Jordan
— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) October 11, 2023
At least one person appreciated the Republican dissidents.
“Thank you. We don’t want McCarthy light,” one X user posted in reply to Luna.
Thank you. We don’t want McCarthy light.
— D. Mclaughlin – panem et circenses (@DonMcLaughlin9) October 11, 2023
That “McCarthy light” label, fair or otherwise, poses a significant obstacle in Scalise’s quest to secure the necessary 218 votes.
With the GOP holding a narrow 221-212 majority, plus two vacant seats, Scalise can afford only seven defections. Assuming Boebert, Good, Greene and Luna hold to their pledges, the Republican nominee has very little wiggle room.
Indeed, as the day unfolded, Scalise’s uphill climb appeared steeper and steeper.
Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, for instance, estimated “at least 20” GOP holdouts.
“Let’s be clear, January was a coronation, and it was difficult. This is a competition and it’s going to be even more difficult,” Massie said Wednesday according to CNN.
It appears that more House drama — and perhaps a good deal of it — lay ahead.
The post House Will Not Choose Speaker Today: Does Scalise Have Enough Votes to Win? appeared first on The Western Journal.
What role does the speaker of the House play in our government’s functioning?
The votes, so no speaker was elected today. I still strongly believe that Jim Jordan is the best choice for speaker, and I will vote for him on the House floor,” Good said in a tweet.
The division within the Republican party regarding the speaker position is not surprising. The GOP has been grappling with internal conflicts and power struggles for years. From the rise of the Tea Party to the Trump era, different factions within the party have emerged, each with its own agenda and vision for the future.
Steve Scalise, the current Republican nominee for speaker, is seen as a more establishment figure. While he has the support of some party members, others view him as part of the same old Washington politics that they want to dismantle.
Jim Jordan, on the other hand, represents the more conservative wing of the party. He is known for his fiery speeches and relentless pursuit of conservative principles. For many Republicans, he embodies the kind of change they want to see in leadership.
But regardless of the divisions and disagreements, the House still needs a speaker. The speaker of the House is a crucial role in our government’s functioning. They are responsible for leading legislative agendas, ensuring the smooth operation of the House, and representing the interests of their respective parties.
Without a speaker, the House would descend into chaos. Legislation would stall, important decisions would be delayed, and the functioning of our democracy would be compromised. Chaos may reign in the world, but we cannot let it prevail within the walls of our legislative body.
The search for a speaker should not be seen as a power struggle or a contest between different factions. It should be a thoughtful and deliberate process aimed at finding the best candidate to lead the House and uphold the principles and values of our democracy.
We need a speaker who can bring people together, bridge the gaps between different factions, and work towards meaningful solutions for the challenges facing our nation. The speaker should be someone who commands respect, fosters unity, and puts the interests of the American people above all else.
The House of Representatives still needs a speaker, regardless of the chaos and divisions that may exist within the party. It is essential that the members of the House prioritize this task and come together to ensure the stability and effectiveness of our legislative branch.
As the House continues its search for a speaker, it is my hope that they put aside their differences and focus on the greater goal of serving the American people. We cannot afford to let chaos reign in our government. We must find a speaker who can bring order, unity, and progress to the House of Representatives.
Ultimately, the choice of speaker will have a significant impact on the direction and success of our legislative agenda. It is a decision that should not be taken lightly. Let us remember the importance of this position and the responsibility it carries.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...