Swing state election laws altered post-2020

Changes in Swing States’ Election Laws Could Impact November Presidential⁤ Election

Get ready⁢ for a rematch! The upcoming November presidential election is⁣ set⁣ to be a ‍showdown between President Joe Biden and⁢ former President‍ Donald Trump. But don’t expect everything to be the same ⁤as last time when voters head to the polls. Several swing ‌states that hold the key ⁣to deciding the race have made significant changes to their election laws in the past four years. Let’s take a closer ⁣look at three of these⁤ states and how their new⁣ laws could impact the ‍November election.

Arizona

In the Grand Canyon State, concerns over the 2020 election and allegations of a “stolen” election​ by Trump prompted Republicans to push for election law reforms. In‌ 2022, ​the state legislature passed ​a law requiring ‌voters to provide proof of citizenship to ensure election integrity. A federal court recently upheld much of this law. Another reform changed the threshold for an automatic recount, increasing ⁣the chances of a recount in‌ a tight race. Arizona’s Senate and House‍ primary is scheduled for July 30. For more⁤ information on the state’s election⁣ procedures, visit their website.

Georgia

The Peach State made headlines with ⁢its election law changes less than a year after the contentious 2020 presidential election. The state legislature approved Senate ‌Bill 202 in‌ 2021, ​which introduced‍ several ​new requirements, such as showing state-issued ID when ‍applying for absentee ballots and limiting gifts to voters in line. President​ Biden criticized the law, calling it “Jim ⁢Crow in⁤ the 21st century.”‌ Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger ⁣defended the law and urged ⁤the ⁤Biden administration to stop spreading misinformation. Georgia’s​ House‌ primaries are scheduled for May 21. To learn more about voting in Georgia, ‍visit the state’s website.

Michigan

Another battleground state ​from the 2020 ‍election,​ Michigan, has also made‍ changes to its election laws. In 2022 and 2023, voters approved ​Proposal 2, which added‍ new voting laws to⁣ the state’s constitution. These changes⁢ include⁣ a nine-day ⁣early voting period and requirements for⁣ voters to​ provide identification or sign an affidavit when voting ‍or applying for an‌ absentee ballot. Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed a series of bills ‍into law in November, further expanding voting rights. Michigan’s⁣ Senate and House primary is scheduled for August 6. For more information on⁣ the state’s election ⁣procedures, visit their website.

These​ changes in swing states’ election laws could have a significant‌ impact on the November ​presidential election. It’s crucial for voters to stay​ informed⁤ and understand how these new laws may‍ affect their‌ voting ‍experience. Make sure to visit your state’s election ⁢website for detailed information on voting procedures ⁣and requirements.

What are the arguments made by supporters and critics regarding the potential effects of the ban on “ballot harvesting” in Arizona?

Similar law was passed‌ in 2013 but was struck down by ‍the Supreme Court in 2018. This new law, however, remains in effect. Under this new requirement, voters must provide documents such as a birth certificate, passport, or naturalization certificate to⁣ register to vote. Supporters argue that this ⁣will⁢ prevent voter fraud and maintain the integrity of the election process. Critics, however, argue that this law disproportionately affects minority communities and⁢ could lead to voter suppression.

Another significant change in Arizona’s election law⁣ is the ban on “ballot harvesting,” which was implemented in 2016. Ballot harvesting refers to the practice of collecting⁢ and delivering mail-in ballots on behalf of others. The new ⁢law limits who can collect and return someone’s ballot to only⁢ family members,​ caregivers, ​and postal workers. Supporters argue that this will⁢ prevent potential fraud and manipulation of mail-in⁣ ballots. Critics, on the other hand, argue that this law could disenfranchise ⁤certain communities, such as ‍elderly or disabled individuals, who may rely on others to assist them in voting.

Pennsylvania

During the 2020 election, Pennsylvania played a crucial role in deciding the ‌outcome of the‌ presidential race. As a result, the state’s election laws ⁢have faced scrutiny and ‍debate since then. One ​significant change that‍ has occurred is the implementation of a voter ID ⁢requirement. Previously, voters⁤ only needed to provide identification ⁢when voting for the​ first time at their⁢ polling place. Under ​the new law, voters must show a valid photo ID every time they⁣ cast their ballot. Proponents argue that this will prevent voter impersonation and ensure the integrity of the election. ‌However, critics argue that this requirement may disproportionately impact minority and low-income⁢ communities, who may face difficulties in obtaining ​proper identification.

Another change in Pennsylvania’s election law is the extension of the mail-in ballot deadline. Prior to the 2020 election, mail-in ballots had to be received by 8 p.m. on‍ Election ⁣Day to be counted. However, a recent law passed by the state legislature allows for mail-in ballots to be counted if they are postmarked by Election Day and received by 5​ p.m. on the following Friday. Supporters argue that this extension will ensure that all eligible ballots are counted, especially considering potential delays in mail delivery. Critics, however, claim that this⁤ could lead to⁢ delays in announcing election results and potentially undermine public trust in the process.

Georgia

Georgia gained significant attention during the 2020 election due to allegations ⁢of voter suppression and ‍controversial election laws. In response to these concerns, the state has made⁣ several changes to its election laws. One significant change is the requirement of additional identification for absentee voting. Under the new law, voters must provide their driver’s‌ license number, state identification card number, or a copy of an acceptable form of identification when applying for an absentee ballot. Supporters argue⁢ that this measure ⁤will prevent fraud and ensure ⁣the security of absentee voting. Critics claim that this will disproportionately impact minority communities ‍and create⁤ additional barriers to voting.

Another change⁤ in Georgia’s election law‍ is the reduction in the number of ⁤drop boxes available for voters to return their absentee ballots. Previously, drop boxes were ⁢allowed in all counties and were available 24/7. Under the new law, drop boxes⁤ are limited‌ to one per early voting location⁣ and are only accessible during early voting hours. Supporters argue that‌ this will ⁢prevent potential misuse of drop boxes and maintain the chain of​ custody for absentee⁤ ballots. Critics argue that this will create difficulties for voters, particularly those in urban areas with limited access ‍to drop boxes.

These are just a few examples of the changes that swing states have made to their election laws in recent years. It is important to note that these changes have been met with both ⁣support and opposition, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding election integrity and voter access. As the November presidential election ⁢approaches, it will be crucial‌ to closely ⁣monitor the impact of these‌ changes on voter turnout and the overall democratic process.