Hunter Biden requests his father’s appointed judge to investigate former business partner who snitched.
Hunter Biden Calls for Investigation of Former Business Associate
Before the 2020 election, former Hunter Biden business associate Tony Bobulinski revealed a bombshell. He disclosed that he had met with Joe and Hunter Biden to discuss potential business deals in China, contradicting the president’s claims that he had never discussed business with his son. Now, Hunter Biden is taking action and urging federal prosecutors to investigate his ex-business partner.
Legal Pressure Mounts
In a letter sent on Friday, Hunter Biden’s attorney Abbe Lowell called on Matthew Graves, the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., to launch an investigation into Bobulinski. The allegation is that Bobulinski lied to the FBI about his dealings with the Bidens, as reported by NBC News. During an October 2020 interview with FBI agents, Bobulinski discussed his interactions with the Bidens, including a meeting in May 2017 regarding a joint venture with Chinese energy conglomerate CEFC China Energy.
This letter is just one part of Hunter Biden’s aggressive new legal strategy against his former associates and critics. He has filed lawsuits against several political operatives who released data from his abandoned laptop, which was left at a Delaware computer shop in 2019. Additionally, he has called on the Department of Justice to investigate these operatives, including former Donald Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Hunter Biden’s pressure campaign raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest. He is currently facing federal investigations into his business dealings and an unrelated gun crime. Furthermore, Matthew Graves, who was appointed by Joe Biden, is now under scrutiny after two IRS whistleblowers accused him of refusing to cooperate with Delaware U.S. attorney David Weiss in his investigation of Hunter Biden.
Bobulinski’s Revelations
Bobulinski’s revelations about the Bidens have significantly undermined the president’s claims regarding his son’s activities. In October 2020, Bobulinski released information that corroborated many of the documents found on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop. He verified the authenticity of an email on the laptop that referred to a business arrangement involving “the big guy,” which Bobulinski publicly stated was a reference to Joe Biden. According to Bobulinski, the president was set to receive a 10 percent stake in their deal with China.
Even more damning, Bobulinski released text messages showing that he had met with Hunter and Joe Biden in Los Angeles to discuss CEFC China Energy. At a press conference on October 21, 2020, Bobulinski boldly declared, “I have heard Joe Biden say he has never discussed his dealings with Hunter. That is false. I have firsthand knowledge about this because I directly dealt with the Biden family, including Joe Biden.”
Additional evidence has since emerged, further implicating Joe Biden in his son’s activities. Rob Walker, a longtime Biden family friend, informed the FBI in December 2020 that Joe Biden had attended a meeting with CEFC China Energy executives.
In August 2017, Hunter Biden and his uncle Jim Biden eventually struck a deal with CEFC China Energy, excluding Bobulinski and several other partners from the joint venture. CEFC China Energy wired a total of $6 million to Hunter and Jim Biden in 2017 and 2018. Hunter Biden even used his father as a threat against CEFC China Energy, as revealed in his text messages. In a message dated July 31, 2017, Biden berated a CEFC China Energy executive over a payment dispute.
Bobulinski did not respond to a request for comment.
What are the allegations made by Leblowers against Graves regarding the audit of the president’s tax returns, and how does this raise questions about the impartiality behind Hunter Biden’s request for an investigation into Bobulinski?
Leblowers alleged that Graves attempted to interfere with the audit of the president’s tax returns. This connection raises questions about the impartiality and motive behind Hunter Biden’s request for an investigation into Bobulinski.
However, it is worth noting that Bobulinski’s claims have been met with skepticism by some. Critics argue that his allegations lack substantial evidence and that they may be politically motivated. Nevertheless, the fact that Hunter Biden is pushing for an investigation demonstrates his desire to clear his name and address any potential wrongdoing.
The Impact on the Biden Administration
The ongoing controversies surrounding Hunter Biden have had a significant impact on the Biden administration. Critics argue that his involvement in questionable business deals and potential conflicts of interest undermine President Joe Biden’s commitment to transparency and integrity.
Moreover, the revelations made by Tony Bobulinski have raised concerns about the influence foreign entities might have had on the former vice president. The alleged meetings and discussions regarding business ventures in China during Joe Biden’s time as vice president bring into question the integrity and impartiality of his decision-making process.
Therefore, it is crucial for federal prosecutors to thoroughly investigate Bobulinski’s claims and determine the veracity of his statements. This investigation is not only necessary to ensure justice and accountability but also to uphold the integrity and credibility of the Biden administration.
Conclusion
Hunter Biden’s call for an investigation into his former business associate Tony Bobulinski highlights the legal pressure he is facing and his efforts to address the controversies surrounding his business dealings. The potential conflicts of interest and the impact on the Biden administration warrant a thorough investigation to ensure transparency and uphold the credibility of the presidency. As the legal proceedings unfold, it remains to be seen how these developments will shape the narrative surrounding Hunter Biden and his connection to the Biden family.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...