Hunter Biden’s lawyer claims David Weiss is prohibited from pressing firearm charges.
Hunter Biden’s Attorney Argues Indictment Should Be Barred
Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, made a fiery response to the recent three-count indictment against President Joe Biden’s son. Lowell accused U.S. Attorney David Weiss of succumbing to political pressure and claimed interference by “MAGA Republicans.” He argued that the charges should be barred due to a previous agreement made with prosecutors.
Challenging the Charges
Lowell stated, ”We believe these charges are barred by the agreement the prosecutors made with Mr. Biden, the recent rulings by several federal courts that this statute is unconstitutional, and the facts that he did not violate that law, and we plan to demonstrate all of that in court.”
The agreement in question would have allowed Hunter Biden to plead guilty to misdemeanor tax offenses and avoid prosecution on a felony gun charge. However, the deal fell apart when a federal judge raised concerns about future charges during a plea hearing.
Uncertain Future Charges
The misdemeanor tax charges are still within the statute of limitations, but it remains unclear if prosecutors will pursue them. Constitutional attorney Andrew Lieb suggested that the tax charges could be filed in another jurisdiction, such as Washington, D.C., or California.
While the indictment includes three felony charges related to gun possession, Lieb believes that at least two of them could be dismissed if the judge determines that the pretrial diversion agreement is binding.
Challenging the Constitutionality
Lowell is confident that recent decisions in federal courts support their challenge to the statute Hunter Biden is charged with violating. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit recently declared the same statute unconstitutional, providing an opportunity for the Supreme Court to weigh in if the matter reaches that level.
Lowell concluded, “Hunter Biden possessing an unloaded gun for 11 days was not a threat to public safety, but a prosecutor, with all the power imaginable, bending to political pressure presents a grave threat to our system of justice.”
U.S. Attorney David Weiss declined to address the media after the indictment, and the next step in the case will be an arraignment date for Hunter Biden.
Contributor: Ashley Oliver
How could the alleged political pressure and previous agreement impact the outcome of the indictment and the perceptions of the justice system
3>Background
In recent years, Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, has found himself at the center of controversy. From his business dealings in Ukraine to his alleged involvement in illegal activities, the public’s attention has been firmly fixed on his actions. Now, facing a three-count indictment, Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, has come out guns blazing, arguing that the indictment should be barred. The indictment against Hunter Biden stems from his alleged false statements on a federal firearm background check form. According to the charges, Biden falsely answered “no” to questions asking if he was an unlawful user of, or addicted to, drugs. These false statements were reportedly made in connection with the purchase of a firearm in 2018. Abbe Lowell, a veteran attorney representing Hunter Biden, delivered a fiery response to the indictment. He accused U.S. Attorney David Weiss of succumbing to political pressure and claimed interference by “MAGA Republicans.” Lowell argued that the charges against his client should be barred due to a previous agreement made with prosecutors. Lowell’s argument against the indictment focuses on the alleged political pressure faced by U.S. Attorney David Weiss. Lowell contends that the indictment is a result of external influences and that Weiss succumbed to pressure from “MAGA Republicans.” It is important to note that Lowell provides no concrete evidence to support these claims. Nonetheless, he asserts that politics is at the heart of the charges against Hunter Biden. According to Lowell, there was a prior agreement between Hunter Biden’s legal team and the prosecution that the charges brought forth in the recent three-count indictment would not be pursued. He argues that this agreement was reached during discussions related to other legal matters Hunter Biden was involved in. Lowell believes that this agreement should be honored, and the indictment should be barred as a result. The response from Abbe Lowell raises significant legal and political questions. If Lowell’s claims are true, it would suggest undue influence on the part of external forces in the judicial process. Moreover, it could cast doubt on the integrity and impartiality of the U.S. Attorney’s decision to pursue the indictment. The accusations made by Lowell also point to a broader issue of political interference in the legal system. If political pressure does play a significant role in determining who faces charges and who does not, it raises concerns about the fairness and impartiality of the justice system. As the legal battle unfolds, it is crucial to maintain an objective and unbiased approach. The focus should be on the evidence and the law, not on political affiliations or external pressures. The justice system must ensure a fair and impartial trial for all individuals involved, irrespective of their political connections. In the case of Hunter Biden, it remains to be seen whether the alleged political pressure and previous agreement will have any impact on the outcome of the indictment. Only time will tell whether Abbe Lowell’s arguments will hold weight in the court of law. The indictment against Hunter Biden has ignited a firestorm of controversy and debate. Abbe Lowell’s fiery response alleging political pressure and interference has raised important questions about the integrity of our justice system. As this high-profile case unfolds, it is imperative that the legal process remains fair, transparent, and unbiased. The outcome will not only shape the future of Hunter Biden, but it will also influence the perceptions of the public regarding the functioning of the justice system in the United States.The Allegations
The Attorney’s Response
Political Pressure and Interference
The Previous Agreement
The Implications
The Way Forward
Conclusion
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...