Democracy dies if Democrats criminalize opposition and weaken the court.

Criminalizing the Opposition

Democrats are seeking to land a ⁢one-two punch to cement their control of America today and for generations⁣ to come: Criminalize the political opposition and cripple the last authority​ to which the opposition might appeal in defense of its rights.

This ⁣is one​ way ​to understand two running lines of attack that may⁣ appear independent but ‍are inextricably intertwined.

The first consists of the unprecedented, Soviet show trial-style “show me the man and ⁢I’ll show you the crime”⁤ “cases” conjured up against Donald Trump ‍and⁤ two dozen others in his ‍orbit, chiefly including his lawyers. The zealous prosecutors have many ⁢motives for torturing laws to hang them around the neck of the former president and GOP‌ front-runner ⁤in⁢ the middle of ⁤a campaign​ — a frivolous and vengeful prosecutorial effort pursued arguably in violation of laws, norms, and‌ core ⁢principles of ⁢justice.

While turning the First and Sixth Amendments into dead letters, these cases also effectively criminalize‌ the seeking of office of anyone who might hold unauthorized views, the‌ Republican contesting ⁣of elections or questioning of election integrity, and such‍ Republicans’ legal defense.

“You can ⁤go to jail if you disagree with us, and​ particularly if you ⁣threaten our power and privilege,” our⁣ betters are saying through their chilling lawfare jihad. The point is that⁢ if⁢ Americans cannot be trusted to choose leaders within a narrow set of regime-approved bounds, the regime will have ⁣to force⁤ them upon us by hook or by crook. Locking up the opposition ‍has always been a potential endgame ​for the ruling class in its war on⁤ wrongthink.

Jan. 6, 2021, ‍was the ‌beginning of​ that ‍endgame. It served as a pretext to accelerate the war, as‍ predicted at​ the time. It was also used to justify treating rioters with the “wrong” views not as everyday Americans-turned-petty criminals ⁢in a ‌political protest that‌ got out of hand, but as domestic terrorists.

Crippling the Court

The only thing that may stand in the way of Trump, or any other‌ political dissenters threatened with contrived charges going‍ forward, is the Supreme Court. This brings us to part two ⁣of ⁣the one-two punch: the Democrats’ sustained attack on the ‌highest⁤ court in the land.

Democrats have grown ever more⁣ unhinged ​about the Supreme Court because it represents ⁣perhaps the last powerful American ​institution they do not wholly control. “Borking,” the “high-tech lynching” ⁤of Justice Clarence Thomas, and the caper against Justice Brett Kavanaugh normalized vicious ‌political attacks on non-leftist ⁤justices aimed at destroying them or, at minimum, cowing them​ into submission once seated.

By extension, these assaults normalized vicious ⁤political attacks ⁢on the court itself. For if the justices themselves were deplorable and irredeemable, then so‍ too was the ‌court — a court now to⁢ be‌ treated with the same contempt​ as any other political institution.​ In reality, what the leftist⁤ assailants objected to was that these ‌justices might not rule in accord‌ with the left’s wishes. The court, in short, was illegitimate ⁤if it was not leftist.

The assault ⁤on the court ​escalated with the Dobbs leak, which imperiled its ability to function. The intent was not only to exert ⁢maximum political pressure on the justices to alter their ruling in accord with pro-abortion activists, ⁢but ‍to intimidate them into doing so under⁣ threat of bodily harm. ⁤The left-wing mob’s‌ threatening conduct was abided by a law enforcement apparatus that refused to arrest those who illegally agitated outside the justices’ homes. Kavanaugh even faced an assassination‌ attempt. The Dobbs leak reflected contempt for the rule of law, for the court as an institution, and for the American people whose rights the court exists⁣ to protect.

For months now, the left and its media⁤ mouthpieces have been waging another assault on ⁤the court, this time by leveling phony⁤ and hypocritical charges of ethics violations at ​the court’s ‌most exceptional jurist, Justice Clarence Thomas, and to a lesser degree his peers. These attacks ‍aim‍ to further delegitimize the ‍court and ramp up calls for members to recuse themselves, resign, or face future impeachment ‍proceedings. They may even perhaps aim to soften the ground for ​nullification efforts.

Thomas will never waver in the face ‍of the barrage​ of attacks on him. But what of his potentially more wobbly-kneed colleagues, bearing witness to the‌ ever-growing hysteria over their ‌opinions at times out of step with the ruling class?

Imagine for ​a moment that ⁢one or ‍several cases land at the Supreme Court ⁤that could result in criminal convictions for Donald Trump. One would expect‍ pressure on the‍ non-liberal judges to rule against the former president, recuse, or ⁢face literally or figuratively deathly consequences — more intense than anything ever​ seen ⁣in our lifetime. The threats to ‌pack the court, abolish it, or⁤ otherwise ‍neuter its conservatives will grow exponentially. Surrender‍ to the mob, practically every power center ‍in ⁤the land will demand, ⁤or else.

Will the justices be “red-pilled” in⁢ the face⁢ of these efforts — ever ‍more determined to hew to ⁢the⁢ Constitution in⁢ their jurisprudence? Or will‍ they crumble under pressure?

Democrats no doubt see that the court‌ is⁤ the last backstop for justice — the last respite for ⁤the opposition to protect their rights from leftists aimed at seizing complete⁢ control. Hence their withering⁣ assault on it.

The one-two punch ‌aims to​ knock out Trump. But at a‍ deeper level, it is about ensuring de facto one-party rule at the point of a ⁤gun. Only if a critical mass of Americans “know what time it is” will ‍there be ⁣any hope of combating this onslaught.