The daily wire

Illinois Supreme Court upholds AR-15 ban.

The Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Ban on⁤ AR-15s⁣ and Similar Firearms

In a⁣ significant ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court has upheld⁣ a​ ban on ⁤AR-15s​ and⁤ other similar firearms, despite challenges from Republicans who argued that the law was‍ unconstitutional.

“This‌ is a⁢ commonsense gun reform law ‌to keep mass-killing machines off of ⁤our streets and out of our schools, malls, parks, and places of worship,”

– Governor J.B. Pritzker⁤ (D-IL)

The court’s narrow 4-3 ruling allows Illinois to prohibit the sale of certain handguns, rifles like‌ AR-15s, magazines for long⁤ guns holding more ⁣than 10 rounds, and magazines for⁣ handguns holding more than 15 rounds.

Democratic Judge ‍Elizabeth⁢ Rochford, ‌in⁣ her majority‍ decision, ‍dismissed the plaintiffs’ attempt to combine a Second Amendment claim with an equal protection argument. She emphasized that the law’s constitutionality had already ⁣been established⁢ through previous arguments.

Protecting‌ Illinois Communities

Governor J.B. Pritzker, ⁤who signed ‍the‍ ban into law, praised‍ the court’s decision, stating that it is a crucial step towards ensuring the safety of⁤ Illinoisans in all corners of the state. He referred to a tragic shooting ⁢ in Highland Park on July 4, 2022, which ⁤claimed seven lives and left dozens injured.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY ​WIRE APP

A Dissenting Opinion

In ⁢her‍ dissent, Judge Lisa Holder White highlighted the importance of citizens’ rights to own guns for self-defense, drawing ‌upon the principles on⁢ which the‍ United States was founded.

“This great nation was founded on the premise that the‍ right of law-abiding citizens to bear arms⁢ is essential to what it means to be a free people. The right ‍of law-abiding citizens to possess firearms and to arm ⁣themselves ⁣to ​protect ‍their families, their‌ homes, and themselves must not be infringed,”

– Judge Lisa Holder White

Judge White argued that ⁢the law should be struck down as it did not​ meet the necessary constitutional requirements when it⁢ was⁣ passed.

The U.S.​ Supreme Court has previously declined to⁢ hear a challenge to⁢ the case, opting to await an appeals court ruling on the⁢ matter.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker