The federalist

Imagine if our intelligence agencies focused on targeting real terrorists rather than conservative Americans.

The Shocking⁤ Intelligence Failure in the Hamas Attack on Israel

The barbaric⁢ attack on Israeli​ civilians over‌ the‍ weekend by Hamas terrorists has left people wondering, as we⁣ often do after mass ​tragedies: How did no one see this coming? As a surprisingly ⁣sophisticated, coordinated surprise attack left nearly ‌1,000 people dead and countless more innocents wounded or kidnapped, anyone ‍can recognize the massive intelligence ‍failure without calling into question who is morally culpable ​for the invasion. Iran-backed ​militants attacked civilians‍ from multiple points of entry, hang-gliding into a music ⁢festival and dragging the bodies ​of murdered women through the streets, all effectively⁤ livestreamed ​on the internet.

A⁣ Global Intelligence Failure

It wasn’t just an intel failure on‌ Israel’s part​ — as a close ally with an intelligence presence all over the world,⁣ the United States also failed to foresee the attack. A ‍senior U.S. military official admitted ​to NBC ⁣News that “We ⁣were not tracking this.”‍ CIA counterterrorism veteran Marc Polymeropoulos told the ‌outlet he‍ was “stunned” that American intel agencies were caught​ off guard.

The Disturbing Priorities‍ of the Biden Administration

Intelligence operatives are fallible, yes. But instead of identifying the threat from Hamas terrorists, ​the Biden administration was ⁤busy sending money to their state sponsors in⁣ Iran and employing Iranian⁤ conspirators ⁢at the Pentagon.

There’s another task that’s been keeping America’s ‌so-called “counterterrorism” apparatus busy⁣ lately, though. ⁣Instead of focusing their efforts on actual terrorists — ⁢those abroad and those doubtless infiltrating our porous southern border — the Biden administration has continued,​ and escalated, the trend ​of turning ‌our post-9/11 surveillance state against Americans, smearing them as “terrorists” for their political beliefs.

The Targeting of⁤ Political Opponents

Just last‍ week, Newsweek reported that the FBI is targeting Trump supporters as⁢ “domestic terrorists” ahead of the 2024 election.​ The universal line from the Biden ​administration is that “domestic terrorism” and ‌its‍ aliases — all of ‍which are used as code for political⁢ right-wingers⁤ — ⁣are the No. 1 threat‌ to national security. The effort to make an example out of Trump supporters who ⁣demonstrated at the Capitol ‌on‌ Jan.⁢ 6, 2021, is only one of numerous instances in which ‍Democrats within and beyond ‌intelligence agencies are working to equate “domestic terrorism” with their political⁤ opponents.

Two⁤ years ago, Biden’s Education Department infamously planted⁣ a letter ⁢from ​the⁢ National ​School Boards⁢ Association ‌to Attorney General Merrick Garland, urging​ him ⁣to target concerned parents who‌ showed up at school board meetings⁤ to protest Democrats’ Covid policies⁤ and their racialist and ⁢sexually graphic curricula ​in public schools. The letter smeared those parents as domestic terror threats and urged the Department of Justice to wield counterterrorism laws against ⁤them, and Garland happily acted on the ‍suggestion.

The Erosion of Civil Liberties

A few months later, the politicized Department of Justice announced a new “domestic terrorism unit” to deal with​ “an elevated threat from domestic violence extremists,” including “those who ascribe to extremist ‌anti-government and anti-authority ideologies.” Taking things a ‍step further, disgraced former Deputy⁤ FBI Director Andrew ⁢McCabe claimed that targeting the “fringes of the right-wing movement” was insufficient to “catch ​this‍ threat,” and⁤ instead called for federal suspicion of‍ “mainstream” conservatives.

In‍ June 2021, the Biden administration released a “National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism.” It proposed ⁢to “counter domestic terrorism by addressing underlying racism ​and bigotry” — and they weren’t talking about the racism that led ⁤Hamas militants to slaughter Israeli⁣ civilians this past weekend and has driven violence against Israel in the region ⁢for‌ decades. A National Terrorism Advisory System bulletin issued the same year lumped‌ “conspiracy theories on perceived election‍ fraud” and⁢ “responses to anticipated restrictions relating to the increasing COVID cases” in the‍ same​ sentence as “domestic violent extremist ideologies.”

The Misuse of Intelligence Resources

Our intelligence apparatus expends resources on⁤ things like‌ telling Big Tech companies which ⁤free-thinking Americans’ social media posts to censor, as we ​discovered via⁣ the “Twitter Files” and Missouri v. Biden. It’s actively researching how ⁤to most efficiently ⁣surveil ‍what you say online. The FBI has been putting⁣ its resources to work targeting — and likely “infiltrating” — traditional ⁢Catholic congregations, and terrorizing peaceful pro-lifers like Mark Houck, a pastor who was dragged away in a ⁢surprise raid at ⁢his home in front of his‌ family.

It’s ‍not just domestic ‍intel⁢ agencies being ‍wielded against Americans; the ⁤CIA did its part to help Twitter censor speech, and even solicited signatures to help falsely smear damaging reporting about the Biden family as disinformation ahead of the 2020 election. (For some reason, none of those​ involved are being arrested⁣ for “conspiracy against voting rights.”)

A Safer World with Proper Priorities

Across the⁣ board, we’ve seen​ the people we elected,‍ and countless bureaucrats we did not, weaponizing supposedly counterterror laws like the Patriot Act against Americans’ First and Fourth Amendment freedoms (at least).

Imagine if those resources‍ were redirected away from targeting ordinary, law-abiding Americans for their political views and aimed‍ at stopping actual terrorists who seek to harm us and‌ our allies. Contrary to the pretense that surveilling Americans as walking national security threats is for our own protection, our world would be ⁢a lot safer.


How does the erosion of civil liberties in the name of national security impact the fight against ⁤global acts⁢ of​ terrorism?

Global ‍acts of​ terrorism. No, they were talking about targeting Americans with differing political beliefs and labeling them⁣ as domestic terrorists. This erosion of civil liberties in the name of national⁣ security is deeply concerning and diverts attention and resources away from real threats.

The Need for Effective Intelligence Gathering

The shocking ⁢intelligence failure in the Hamas attack on Israel ⁣highlights the critical need for effective intelligence gathering and analysis. It is clear that both Israeli and American intelligence agencies were caught off guard, despite the advanced surveillance capabilities at their ⁣disposal. The failure to ‌detect and prevent such a devastating attack‌ raises serious⁤ questions about the effectiveness‍ and ⁣efficiency of our intelligence systems.

Intelligence agencies play a crucial role in identifying and preventing acts ‌of terrorism. Their primary responsibility is to​ gather and analyze information to provide ‍accurate assessments of potential threats. However, it ⁤is evident that these agencies need to improve their capabilities and enhance their coordination in order to adapt to the ever-evolving tactics of terrorist organizations.

The Role⁤ of Politics in Intelligence

One of the underlying issues in the intelligence failure is the politicization of intelligence agencies. Instead of focusing on their core mission of protecting national⁢ security, intelligence agencies ⁣have been subverted​ by political agendas. This is evident in the case of the Biden administration, which has directed ⁢its resources towards targeting political opponents rather than addressing ⁢real threats.

Labeling Trump supporters as domestic terrorists⁤ and ⁢equating political dissent with terrorism is a dangerous and misguided approach. It⁣ undermines the fundamental principles of democracy and freedom ⁢of speech. It also distracts intelligence ​agencies from their primary mission and⁢ compromises⁤ their impartiality and credibility.

Moving Forward

In order to prevent ⁣future intelligence failures, it⁤ is crucial⁤ to address the⁢ politicization of intelligence agencies ⁤and⁤ prioritize their core mission of national security. Intelligence agencies ​must ‌be‍ free⁢ from political interference and their focus should be solely on gathering and analyzing information to detect and prevent acts of terrorism.

Additionally, there needs to be improved coordination and‌ information sharing between domestic and international intelligence agencies. The attack on Israel by‍ Hamas demonstrates the importance of a global intelligence network to effectively combat terrorist threats. Enhanced collaboration and communication between countries will⁢ enable early detection and prevention⁤ of ⁢such attacks.

Furthermore, intelligence agencies must ⁤invest ‌in ⁤advanced technologies and techniques‍ to stay ahead of emerging threats. This includes the utilization of artificial intelligence, data analytics,⁤ and other innovative tools to analyze vast amounts of information⁢ and identify patterns and potential threats.

In conclusion, the shocking intelligence failure in the Hamas attack on Israel highlights the need ‌for improvements in intelligence⁣ gathering, coordination, and impartiality. Political agendas must not ‌compromise⁣ the effectiveness of intelligence agencies, and their focus should be solely‍ on protecting national ‍security. ‍By‍ addressing these issues and investing in advanced technologies, we can strengthen our intelligence capabilities and prevent future tragedies.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker