The federalist

Tucker Carlson in Iowa: Media Fails, He Succeeds.

Last week, six⁢ Republican candidates ⁤for ‍president had the opportunity to ⁤answer questions from an interviewer who actually⁢ shares ​a lot of the ‍same views and⁣ concerns as⁤ the average person who ⁤will end up‌ voting for those ⁢candidates. How refreshing!

Friday’s interviews, hosted by Tucker⁤ Carlson and Blaze​ Media⁤ at the Family Leadership‌ Summit⁤ in⁤ Iowa, have ​implications aplenty for the Republican⁢ Party, the 2024 primary, and the candidates​ themselves (some of ⁤whom ​escaped the hot seat more intact than ⁣others). But the biggest ⁣loser of the day ‍wasn’t Mike Pence or Asa ‌Hutchinson; it ⁣was ⁤the failed gatekeepers in America’s corporate media.

The Media Charade

The⁢ big shots at legacy media outlets like CNN or MSNBC are so disgusted by ⁤Republicans, from Trump to ​concerned ⁢parents to pregnancy center‌ volunteers, that it’s impossible for them to ⁢take conservatives or⁣ their ideas seriously.⁣ Even just having a (the?) prominent Republican‌ on air for an interview is anathema; look at the meltdown they had ⁣after​ CNN hosted‍ a town ⁢hall with Donald ‌Trump.

When Republicans ‌are invited on air, it’s⁢ for⁣ one ‍of ‌two purposes: to mock them or to get them to cave to the hive ⁤mind. Often, the ​first tactic ‍is used ‍to achieve the ‍second. Elected ‍Republicans are chronically ⁢susceptible to this.

No matter what, the peppering ⁤always comes ‍from one direction. CNN‌ anchors don’t ask‌ questions from the perspective⁢ of ⁣Republican voters; they ask questions from the perspective of D.C. or⁤ New York journalists ⁣who spend‍ their‍ lives on Twitter or at White House Correspondents’ Dinners. And ⁣as Steve ​Deace,⁤ a BlazeTV host, pointed out, establishment‌ Republicans like it that way.

“There is a‍ reason the​ GOP wants⁤ enemy media⁢ to moderate ⁣their⁢ debates/forums. So that they only get hit from the Left, and therefore every Republican looks‍ like a ⁢hero,” ⁣Deace explained. ⁤“Pence‌ is indistinguishable⁢ from Trump. Asa indistinguishable from DeSantis. So⁣ it⁣ doesn’t⁤ matter ⁤who wins primaries, because they’re all ‘better⁤ than the⁤ Democrats.’ This scam has ⁣ruined us,⁢ the party, and this ​country for decades.”

That “scam”⁤ is‍ a recipe ‌for sloppy​ media‌ and sloppy candidates,​ not to mention​ dissatisfied voters. For⁣ years, ⁤the big‍ networks mostly maintained ⁤this ⁢monopoly, with some controlled opposition. ‌Now, the​ success of a forum​ like what ‌Carlson ​facilitated ‌on ⁢Friday​ shows⁤ the‍ cracks in the current ‌media⁢ landscape ⁢— and the hunger ⁢conservative voters⁢ have for ​such ⁢an alternative.

⁢​

Filling the Void

‌ ​‌

In Iowa, ‍Tucker Carlson put GOP candidates in a‌ position they don’t often find themselves: getting questions from their⁤ right ⁢instead of ⁢their left. He ‌asked former Arkansas⁢ Gov. Asa Hutchinson why he vetoed a ​bill⁤ banning ⁢transgender interventions for children, and⁣ he asked former ⁤Vice President Mike⁣ Pence to answer to‍ voters who feel he’s more concerned about‌ defending⁤ Ukraine ‍than defending American cities.​

⁤ ⁢

In ⁣doing‍ so, Carlson’s ⁣questions actually did Republican ​candidates a favor, though​ some‌ of them⁤ refused to​ take advantage of it.​ In⁣ a media environment where many of the widely​ held perspectives behind his questions⁤ are​ muscled or⁤ mocked out ⁢of the public square, he gave the interviewees ammunition to help legitimize them. As⁤ every institutional⁢ powerhouse in media​ yanks the rope to ⁢the⁣ left, events ‍like Friday’s summit offer a tug the other ​way.

​ ⁣

For Republicans ‍who ⁣actually like⁤ their voter ‍base, that’s⁢ a good⁣ thing. For those who don’t, it’s revealing, which is good‍ for everyone⁤ else.⁤ But ​most importantly, it fills a void for voters: The questions ‍they care about actually reach ​candidates, they get to ​hear the answers, and they⁣ see someone in media who actually represents them. It’s why Tucker Carlson ⁣is ‌so⁣ popular⁢ and why trust ⁣in ⁤corporate media is abysmally low.⁤

The ‘New Contras’

Carlson‍ may be‌ the most influential public figure in ⁤America, ⁣but he’s representative of a ⁣shift that’s ⁤been gaining momentum for years. In 2020, Ben Domenech and Emily ​Jashinsky wrote in The Federalist of ‍those they termed the ⁢“New Contrarians,” ⁢or the “New Contras”​ — “a band of center-left journalists whose willingness ⁤to critique the excesses of leftism‌ have pushed them from⁢ major publications to ⁣ascendant‍ self-publishing platforms.”

[READ: The New⁢ Contras’ ⁤Insurgence ⁤Against Legacy Media Is⁢ Only Getting Hotter]

​ ⁤

These center-left dissidents ⁤may be ⁣strange bedfellows with a right-wing⁤ firebrand⁤ like ⁤Carlson, but they’re both​ part of the⁤ same sea change‌ against⁢ legacy ‌media gatekeepers made​ possible by the​ entrepreneurial possibilities of the internet and ⁣the‌ insufferable arrogance⁣ of media⁤ elites.

As⁢ the Manhattan ‍Institute’s Ilya Shapiro explained to‍ Domenech and‌ Jashinsky, “Before⁣ the internet, you needed to have some ⁤form of institutional support”​ to ​enter the ​media landscape.
“The democratization and ⁢the lowering ⁤of barriers of entry to influence​ making ‍media is critical here.”

⁢ ‍

With practice ‌and ‍a growing audience, the New Contras are getting savvier. The‍ production ‍quality of ​Friday’s ‌summit, from Carlson’s ⁤interviews to the analysis from ‌Blaze hosts⁢ and guest commentators, was decent ‍and (more⁢ importantly)‍ seemed good ⁤enough ⁤to ‌satisfy ⁢viewers. As ‌media dominance continues ⁣to ‍shift ⁢away from legacy ⁢networks and toward⁣ YouTube, viewers⁤ don’t⁣ appear to be​ dissuaded by‍ nontraditional and even​ makeshift ​setups if a⁤ writer or podcaster has interesting things to say.

⁤ ​

Notably, the breakdown of⁢ the‌ media monopoly isn’t just happening⁣ at news networks and in newsrooms, but it’s ​starting to ‌ripple⁣ through Hollywood.‌ Look no ⁤further⁣ than “Sound of ⁢Freedom,” the anti-child ⁢trafficking movie Angel Studios released on July 4. Like Angel’s​ other big hit, the⁢ TV series “The Chosen,”‌ “Sound of Freedom” is wildly​ successful​ with audiences, ​hitting No. 2 at ⁣the box office this past⁣ weekend.​ Like‌ the Substacks‍ and Patreon content of ‍the New Contras, ‍both cinematic projects have been crowdfunded, and both have been ‍praised for impressive production quality.‍ And‌ like Carlson, they’ve‌ met ⁢with considerable ⁤resistance from ⁢yesterday’s powerbrokers.

⁢⁤

From movies⁤ to⁣ journalism, these ventures are⁤ cropping up because⁢ the ​gatekeepers ​at‌ legacy networks ⁢and studios inadvertently created a‌ vacuum for ‌them. The void is obvious to everyone who isn’t in the echo chamber. ⁣Tucker Carlson, ‍the New⁣ Contras, and⁢ their merry band of misfits⁢ are doing the​ job the decaying media monolith refuses to —⁢ and⁢ they’re ⁢getting‍ better⁤ at ​it.


‍ ‍


" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker