The federalist

Ridley Scott’s ‘Napoleon’ lacks both truth and myth

“The Man Who Shot Liberty Valence” and the Power of Legends

“This the West, ⁢sir. When the legend‌ becomes fact, print the legend,” Maxwell Scott, editor of the Shinbone Star, tells‌ Sen. Ransom Stoddard in John⁤ Ford’s 1962 classic. Formerly believing that ⁤Stoddard’s past heroic deeds​ brought order and civilization ​to his society — and perhaps fearful of running‍ the story or reverent of the mythology‌ he was familiar with ‌— Scott opted not ⁤to publish the truth after‌ learning it.

Every civilization relies on ⁤its legends and myths to remind‍ people what⁣ to believe and why it exists. ​American history, for instance, has provided the American ⁢people with a shared set of ​stories and ‍figures⁢ on ⁤which they could rely ⁣for national identity and virtues. However, leftists consistently attack this history, undermining our civic ‌traditions.

The Disappointment of Ridley Scott’s “Napoleon”

With great disappointment, I must say that Ridley​ Scott’s “Napoleon” is terrible. The film’s egregious pacing and ⁤critical character inaccuracies detract from the ⁤important aspects ​of Napoleon’s life. But beyond that, the ‍film’s philosophical issues and its attempt ​to humanize⁢ Napoleon only serve to diminish his greatness.

Scott’s film fails to explore the cultural and philosophical milieu⁢ in which‌ Napoleon rose⁤ to power.⁢ Instead, ​it reduces‌ his life to a two-dimensional psychosexual dramedy, ignoring the moral collapse and chaos⁤ of ⁢revolutionary ⁢France. The film also neglects to show Napoleon’s military conquests and political initiatives accurately, focusing ‌instead ⁤on his relationship with his first wife.

By reducing Napoleon to a temperamental⁢ man-child, the⁢ film⁣ fails⁣ to capture his⁤ unique vision and⁢ capability. It overlooks his love and support ​from France and his‍ significant contributions ⁣to the nation. The film’s portrayal of Napoleon is shallow and inaccurate,‍ lacking the depth and complexity ⁤that made‌ him a historical⁤ figure worth‍ revering.

Scott’s Napoleon is entirely static and two-dimensional, except when ⁣confined to his relationship with Josephine. The film‍ misses the opportunity to depict Napoleon as the‌ “synthesis of‌ the⁣ inhuman and superhuman,” as‌ Friedrich Nietzsche described him.‌ It fails⁣ to capture his calculated, ruthless ambition and his ability ​to bend ⁤the arc of history ⁣in ‍his favor.

Napoleon is rightly revered because he is a testament ​to the rare great‌ man who⁢ harnessed his nature to achieve ⁢greatness. Motivated by self-interest ⁢and‌ a belief in something larger than himself, he changed the world. These are the facts upon which the legend is built. Unfortunately, Scott’s⁤ film fails to depict Napoleon‌ accurately‍ and falls short of its source material.

⁣What are the potential‍ consequences of preserving a ‍myth or legend for the greater good, even if it goes against the truth?

Rical narrative, arguing that it is a tool used⁤ by the powerful to maintain their dominance and oppress marginalized groups. While it ‍is true that historical narratives can be manipulated​ and distorted, it is important to recognize the power and value of legends in ‍shaping societies⁢ and inspiring individuals.

The movie “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” explores the notion of legends and their impact⁤ on individuals and society. The main character, Sen. Ransom Stoddard, is a lawyer who believes in the power of law and ‍order to bring about change in the Wild West. However, it ‍is‌ ultimately ​revealed that it was not the law that tamed‍ the West, but rather the actions​ of‌ an outlaw named‍ Tom Doniphon. Stoddard is forced to confront the⁤ truth that his legend is built on a ⁢lie, and⁣ he must grapple with the implications of this revelation.

The quote by Maxwell Scott, “When the legend becomes⁤ fact, print the legend,” highlights the ⁢complex ‍relationship between truth and⁤ legend. It⁣ suggests that sometimes it is more important to preserve the‍ myth for the greater good, rather⁤ than reveal the‌ truth. This raises questions⁣ about​ the role of legends in ‍society and their ability to shape perceptions⁤ and inspire action.

Legends ​and myths have ⁣always been a fundamental part of human society.⁢ They serve as a collective memory, preserving cultural values, ideals, and historical events. They provide ‍individuals with a sense of belonging and identity, and offer guidance and inspiration through the stories of⁤ legendary figures. Legends create a shared narrative that binds a community together, fostering a sense of pride and unity.

In the case of⁤ American⁣ history, legends such as‍ George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and⁤ Abraham Lincoln ‍have become symbols of the nation’s values and ideals. Their stories inspire generations of Americans to strive for liberty, justice, ​and equality. While ⁢it is important to critically examine historical narratives and ​acknowledge their flaws, it is also crucial to recognize the ⁤power of these⁢ legends in shaping national identity‍ and motivating individuals‍ to work towards a better future.

Leftists ⁤who criticize the reliance on legends and myths in ‌shaping national identities often argue that these narratives perpetuate inequality and ignore the ‌struggles of marginalized groups. While it is true ⁣that​ some legends may have roots in oppressive systems, it is important to separate⁤ the historical⁤ context‌ from the value of the myth itself. Legends can evolve ⁢and ​be reinterpreted⁤ to reflect a more inclusive ​and accurate understanding of history.

For example, the‍ legend of the American West has traditionally focused on the exploits of ‍white cowboys‍ and pioneers, often neglecting the⁢ contributions and ​experiences of Native Americans, African Americans, ⁣and other marginalized groups. However, contemporary scholars⁤ and storytellers ⁤are actively working to include these perspectives in the narratives of the Wild West, recognizing ⁤the importance of representing a diverse and⁣ comprehensive ⁤history.

In conclusion, legends and myths play‌ a vital role in shaping societies and ⁣inspiring individuals. While it is essential to critically examine ‌and challenge ‍historical narratives, it is equally important to recognize the power of‍ legends in preserving cultural values and inspiring action. The movie “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance” serves as a​ reminder of the complexities of truth and⁤ legend, ‍and the significance of these stories in our collective consciousness. By embracing a more inclusive and accurate⁢ understanding of history, we can create a shared narrative that reflects the ‌diverse experiences ⁢and contributions of‌ all ‍individuals.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker