Is The Fed Trying To Wean Markets Off Monetary Policy?
Commentary
Is The Fed Trying to get the markets off monetary policy? Such An interesting idea from the past British Diplomat Alastair Crooke Through the Strategic Culture Foundation, to wit:
“The Fed however, may be attempting to implement a contrarian, controlled demolition of the U.S. bubble-economy through interest rate increases. The rate rises will not slay the inflation ‘dragon’ (they would need to be much higher to do that). The purpose is to break a generalised ‘dependency habit’ on free money.”
That This powerful statement, if it is true, will have a profound impact on the economy and financial markets in the next ten years. Such It is crucial to remember the effects of repeated fiscal and monetary interventions on your finances. financial market returns The previous decade.
The Below is the chart showing annual inflation adjusted total returns, including dividends. It was created in 1928. The total return data was taken from Aswath DamodaranPlease see: Stern School Of Business professor at New York University. The The chart below shows how the market has returned 8.48% after inflation from 1928 through 2021. HoweverNotice that returns increased by four percentage points on average for different periods after 2008’s financial crisis.
We These outsized returns can be directly tracked back to the Fed’s repeated monetary and the government’s fiscal policy interventions during that period. Following Financial crisis: Federal Reserve Every time that the market was in danger or stumbled, we intervened to provide monetary assistance “wealth effect.”
While Many people want to suggest this. Federal Reserve’s monetary interventions do not affect financial markets, the correlation between the two is extremely high.
HoweverThe result of over a decade’s unrestrained monetary experiments has led to an enormous wealth gap in America, which is now front and centre of the political landscape.
It isn’t just the massive expansion in household net worth since the financial crisis that is troublesome. The Problem is, almost 70% of the household’s total net worth is concentrated within the top 10% of income earners.
While It was unlikely that it would be the Fed’s intention to cause such a massive redistribution of wealth, it was the goal of its grand monetary experiment.
Pavlov’s Great Experiment
Classical conditioning (also known as Pavlovian or respondent conditioning) refers to a learning procedure in which a potent stimulus (e.g., food) is paired with a previously neutral stimulus (e.g., a bell). Pavlov He discovered that dogs salivated in anticipation of the powerful stimulus when he gave it to them. This The psychological learning process leads to the learning process “pairing” The stimuli.
This Over the past decade, investors have been subject to conditioning.
In 2010, then-Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke Introduced the “neutral stimulus” To the financial markets by adding “third mandate” To the Fed’s responsibilities—the creation of the “wealth effect.”
Bernanke The author wrote about the “wealth effect” Washington Post Op-Ed November, 2010:
“This approach eased financial conditions in the past and, so far, looks to be effective again. Stock prices rose, and long-term interest rates fell when investors began to anticipate this additional action. Easier financial conditions will promote economic growth. For example, lower mortgage rates will make housing more affordable and allow more homeowners to refinance. Lower corporate bond rates will encourage investment. And higher stock prices will boost consumer wealth and help increase confidence, which can also spur spending. Increased spending will lead to higher incomes and profits that, in a virtuous circle, will further support economic expansion.”
ImportantlyFor conditioning for work, see the “neutral stimulus,” When introduced, the must be observed “potent stimulus” For the “pairing” Completed For Investors, such as Fed Introduced each round “Quantitative Easing,” The “neutral stimulus,” The stock market As the “potent stimulus” rose.
Twelve Years and more than 400% gains later, “pairing” It was completed. Such Investors now switch from one economic report to another. Fed In anticipation of the, we will be meeting up at the next “ringing of the bell.”
The As mentioned above, the problem is that, despite massive growth of the Fed’s balance sheet and the surge in asset prices, there was relatively little translation into broader economic prosperity.
The Problem is “transmission system” After the financial crisis, a lot of monetary policies collapsed.
Instead Although liquidity was moving through the system it was held in reserve by institutions and ultra-wealthy who did not want to be tapped. “investible wealth.” However, those programs failed to boost the bottom 90 percent of Americans living paycheck-to-paycheck.
The The chart below shows that the lack of liquidity has not translated into economic growth. While Since the 2007 peak, the stock market has experienced a more than 180% return. That is more than 6x real GDP growth and 2x corporate revenue growth. I have included SALES growth below because it isn’t as susceptible to manipulation.
Since Asset prices must reflect growth in economic and revenue, deviations from this are indicative of a larger problem. Of The problem is when they attempt to reverse it.
The Great Unwinding
The Below is a summary of the amount. Fed’s current problem.
From Resolving to bail out Bear Stearns HAMP, HARP and TARP are some of the other options. Governmental Along with zero interest rate and an enormous expansion of the capital, bailouts were also offered. Fed’s balance sheetIt is there was roughly $10 of monetary interventions for each $1 of economic growth.
Now, the Federal Reserve It is necessary to figure out how wean the markets from “life support” To return to organic development. The As noted above, the consequences of withdrawing support must be apparent Crooke:
“Perhaps The Fed You can overcome the psychological dependency in a short time. However, this is a daunting task. As It was put by a market strategist: ‘The new operating environment is entirely foreign to any investor alive today. So, we must un-anchor ourselves from a past that is ‘no longer’—and proceed with open minds.’
“This period of zero rates, zero inflation, and QE was a historical anomaly—utterly extraordinary. And it is ending (for better or worse).”
LogicallyThe end of Pavlov’s great “monetary experiment” It can’t end for the best. Once The market is restricted from receiving paired stimuli. Forward returns are required to reflect the fundamental math of economic growth plus inflation, dividends, and other factors. Such Was the fundamental math of returns between 1900 and 2008?
In A world in which the Fed We want 2 percent inflation. Economic growth should equal 2 percent. Dividends can be assumed to remain at 2.5% That math is simple: 2% GDP + 2% dividend – 2% inflation = 4% annualized returns.
Such is a far cry below the 12 percent returns generated over the last 12 years. But Such is the outcome of taking the market out of the years-long monetary madness.
Of There is also a positive side to all of this.
“If Jay Powell breaks the Fed put and takes away the unfair ability of private capital to rape and pillage the system, he will have finally addressed income inequality in America,” Danielle DiMartino BoothChief strategist and CEO of research company Quill Intelligence, said On Twitter Dec. 8.
The bottom line is that fixing the problem won’t be pain-free. Of Of course, it is impossible to break an addiction to any substance. The hope is that the withdrawal doesn’t kill the patient.
Views These opinions are solely those of the author. They do not necessarily represent the views or policies of The Epoch Times.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...