The four-volume document dump contained more than 1,800 pages of evidence, but most of it was redacted or previously known information. One volume contained transcripts of interviews conducted by the defunct Jan. 6 Committee while another contained a compilation of Trump’s social media posts.

The filing was the second part of a two-part behemoth motion that Smith submitted to the court to defend his charges against Trump in the wake of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling on presidential immunity. A sealed version of Smith’s motion, which may contain new or more damning evidence, is not visible to the public.

The first part of the motion, released on Oct. 2, was a 165-page argument by prosecutors that Trump’s conduct in the aftermath of the 2020 election was not subject to presidential immunity because it was privately conducted and made in his capacity as a presidential candidate.

The first filing contained a few new tidbits of unflattering evidence against Trump and his campaign officials related to the 2020 election. Trump, for example, was overheard saying he would “fight like hell” regardless of if he won or lost the election, according to prosecutors. He also allegedly disregarded then-RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel’s concerns about whether her participation in an election-related meeting constituted illegal lobbying. Trump also privately said, according to prosecutors, that one of his former lawyers, Sidney Powell, was “unhinged” and had made election fraud allegations that reminded him of the science fiction series Star Trek.

Trump’s legal team, as well as critics of Chutkan and Smith, have argued that releasing massive documents containing one-sided evidence is prejudicial and improperly interferes with the 2024 election. Elie Honig, a former federal prosecutor, observed in a recent op-ed in New York that Smith was flouting Department of Justice guidelines that discourage prosecutorial activity that could affect an election.

This story is developing.