Conservative News Daily

JD Vance exposes Democrats’ true motives behind mask mandates on Senate floor.

Ohio Republican ⁣Sen. J.D. Vance Introduces ⁢”Freedom to Breathe” Act

On Tuesday, September 5, Ohio Republican Sen.⁣ J.D. Vance introduced his “Freedom ‍to Breathe”‍ act. This act aims ⁣to force‍ Democrats to take a stand on wearing masks​ once ​again. However, when Vance attempted to bring the issue to ​the‍ Senate floor⁤ on Thursday, he was blocked by Democratic Sen. ​Ed Markey.

Markey Attacks Vance’s Bill

Vance put the issue up for a unanimous consent vote on Thursday, but Markey attacked the bill, calling it a “red ⁤herring” and claiming it ‍wasn’t about “freedom.” Markey​ argued that the bill would take power away from local governments to respond to future situations.

This is⁢ quite⁤ a novel approach for a Democrat.​ After ‌all, Democrats typically stand against laws that⁢ allow for local control and usually push policies that force top-down solutions on everyone. ⁣But,⁤ it appears​ that “local control” ⁢can be invoked when it is convenient to oppose⁢ a bill proposing more freedoms.

Naturally, this‍ is the same Sen. ‌Markey who in 2020 introduced a mask bill ‍of his own, but it was⁣ one that ​would require states to⁣ implement forced masking on every American nationwide. Talk about taking away local control!

Vance⁤ Defends His Bill

On Tuesday, Sen. Vance⁢ addressed the⁤ claims that his bill is just Republican rhetoric without substance.⁤ Appearing on Fox News, he spoke ‌about‌ the ‍need to end “COVID tyranny” and ⁣highlighted instances where mask ⁣mandates were being reintroduced despite claims that they wouldn’t be.

“We tried mask mandates once in this country. They ⁢failed to control the spread of respiratory viruses, ⁤violated basic bodily freedom, and set ‍our‍ fellow citizens against one another,” Vance said in his press release. ⁤His “Freedom to Breathe” act aims to ‍prevent federal officials, including the President, from issuing ⁢mask mandates for domestic air travel, public​ transit systems, and schools. It would also prohibit service refusal based on mask-wearing choices.

Study after study has questioned⁣ the efficacy of masks, with some even suggesting they could be potentially dangerous. If masks don’t work and could be harmful, why enforce mandates?

Finally, if ⁣Democrats‍ truly oppose mask mandates, why resist‌ voting for Vance’s bill? It seems like‌ a no-brainer. However,⁣ it’s clear⁤ that they want the power to ⁤impose mask mandates in the future whenever they see fit. They⁢ simply can’t give up that control.

Source: JD‌ Vance Goads Dems Into Revealing True Intentions of⁤ Mask Mandates on Senate Floor



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker