Jeremy Boreing criticizes NYT for attacking Bentkey’s ‘Chip Chilla’ over portrayal of ‘oddly visible’ dad
Daily Wire co-founder Jeremy Boreing slams New York Times for criticizing popular kids shows
Jeremy Boreing, co-founder of the Daily Wire, has strongly criticized a recent New York Times article that labeled the fathers in Bentkey’s “Chip Chilla” and the Australian series “Bluey” as a “fantasy.” Boreing took to social media to express his disagreement with the article, stating that the portrayal of active and engaged fathers in these shows is not problematic but rather commendable.
There are two kids shows that stand out to the @nytimes as problematic: Bentkey’s Chip Chilla and Bluey. And what’s so problematic? “Weirdly present” fathers.
Both fathers are derided as a “fantasy” for being so active and engaged with their children but, according to NYT, Chip… pic.twitter.com/Y5E87h5x65
— Jeremy Boreing (@JeremyDBoreing) December 19, 2023
Boreing further criticized the article’s claim that Chip Chilla is more offensive because it teaches lessons about historical figures and establishes male authority. He emphasized that both “Chip Chilla” and “Bluey” are incredibly popular shows that feature loving and engaged nuclear families with strong values.
Boreing also pointed out that it is not a coincidence that the New York Times is targeting these particular programs. He believes that the left wants to impose its radical agenda on kids’ entertainment and remove good values from it.
The New York Times writer Amanda Hess, in her article, criticizes the portrayal of fathers in both “Bluey” and “Chip Chilla.” She finds it unrealistic that the fathers in these shows are actively involved in household chores and spending quality time with their children. Hess argues that this portrayal does not reflect real-life parenting, where parents are often preoccupied with other tasks.
Hess also suggests that the inclusion of male authority in “Chip Chilla” is a deliberate choice to center the show around male figures. She questions the authenticity of Chum Chum’s character, who is portrayed as a highly involved father and constant joker.
In response to these criticisms, Boreing expressed hope for the future and the need to build a better culture. He believes that platforms like Bentkey can contribute to reclaiming the culture from the left and creating a more positive and values-driven entertainment landscape.
What does Boreing argue about the depiction of active and engaged fathers in children’s programming?
Jeremy Boreing, co-founder of the Daily Wire, has expressed strong criticism towards a recent article published by the New York Times. The article in question labeled the portrayal of fathers in Bentkey’s ”Chip Chilla” and the Australian series ”Bluey” as a “fantasy.” Boreing took to social media to voice his disagreement with the article, arguing that the depiction of active and engaged fathers in these shows should be commended rather than criticized.
In a tweet, Boreing highlighted the Times’ perspective on these two children’s shows and their portrayal of fathers. He sarcastically mentioned that the Times found it problematic that the fathers in these shows were “weirdly present.” Both fathers were derided in the article as a “fantasy” for being highly involved and engaged with their children. According to the New York Times, Chip Chilla and Bluey’s fathers are portrayed in a way that is unrealistic.
Boreing expressed his disagreement with the Times’ perspective by sharing a link to the article and retweeting it with a comment. His response indicates his belief that the portrayal of fathers in these shows is not problematic but rather something to be applauded. Boreing appears to argue that the depiction of involved and caring fathers in children’s programming is a positive step towards challenging traditional gender roles and promoting healthy family dynamics.
The criticism aimed at Bentkey’s ”Chip Chilla” and “Bluey” raises questions about society’s expectations of fathers and the way they are represented in popular media. By characterizing these portrayals as a fantasy, the article seems to suggest that fathers who actively participate in their children’s lives are an anomaly rather than the norm. However, Boreing’s criticism challenges this notion and implies that these shows are breaking new ground by featuring fathers who are present and engaged with their families.
Overall, Boreing’s response to the New York Times article sheds light on the ongoing debates surrounding gender roles and the representation of families in popular media. The criticism directed towards these children’s shows prompts a broader discussion about societal expectations and the importance of promoting diverse and positive portrayals of parenting. Boreing’s defense of Bentkey’s “Chip Chilla” and “Bluey” serves as a reminder that children’s programming can play a crucial role in shaping societal attitudes and encouraging positive family dynamics.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...