Jim Jordan highlights important revelation from Hunter Biden prosecutor’s testimony.
Special Counsel David Weiss Denied Special Attorney Powers to Bring Charges Against Hunter Biden
Special counsel David Weiss revealed that he was unable to obtain the special attorney powers necessary to prosecute Hunter Biden outside of Delaware without the involvement of the local U.S. attorney. This revelation, shared during a closed-door deposition with lawmakers, contradicts the claims made by the prosecutor and highlights the changing narrative from the Department of Justice (DOJ).
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) emphasized the significance of this statement, stating that it was the most important takeaway from Weiss’ testimony. Jordan further explained that the deposition aimed to address the inconsistencies in the DOJ’s explanation of Weiss’ authority. The House Judiciary GOP also confirmed this key point in a tweet.
Jordan also noted that Weiss’ testimony aligns with the claims made by IRS supervisory special agent Gary Shapley, who stated that Weiss was not the final decision-maker regarding charges. The DOJ has not yet responded to Jordan’s comments or released the transcript of the deposition.
Despite these revelations, Weiss maintained in his opening statement that his work was not influenced by political interference. He testified that he faced no obstacles in pursuing charges or conducting the necessary investigation.
Attorney General Merrick Garland granted Weiss special counsel status in August, granting him broader authority to bring charges beyond his district. However, this authority comes with additional oversight provisions. In September, Biden was indicted on federal gun charges, and he has pleaded not guilty. He may also face tax evasion charges as part of the plea agreement.
The investigation into Hunter Biden has been a complex process, with congressional investigators working to uncover the details behind the scenes. Whistleblowers from the IRS, including Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, alleged that the DOJ deliberately delayed the inquiry, potentially preventing additional charges due to the statute of limitations.
Weiss initially claimed to have the “ultimate authority,” but later admitted to discussions with DOJ officials who assured him that he could bring charges outside of his district if necessary.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing in September, Garland stated that Weiss had the discretion to bring any charges he deemed appropriate. However, other U.S. attorneys had the option to decline partnering with Weiss, as confirmed by federal prosecutors from Washington, D.C., and California.
Jim Jordan emphasized the consistency between Shapley and Ziegler’s testimony and the statements made by other witnesses. This further supports the credibility of the whistleblowers’ claims.
What are the implications of David Weiss not having special attorney powers for the prosecution of Hunter Biden outside of Delaware?
Ned with previous statements made by former Attorney General William Barr, who had stated that he had not given Weiss any additional powers beyond his role as special counsel. This further adds to the confusion surrounding the DOJ’s stance on prosecuting Hunter Biden and raises questions about their intentions and motivations.
The fact that Weiss was unable to obtain special attorney powers is significant because it means that he would not be able to bring charges against Hunter Biden outside of Delaware without the involvement of the local U.S. attorney. This limitation could potentially hinder any efforts to hold Hunter Biden accountable for any alleged wrongdoing.
The DOJ’s changing narrative and inconsistent explanations have only fueled speculation and raised suspicions among lawmakers and the public. It is crucial for the DOJ to provide clear and transparent information regarding their decision-making process and their intentions regarding the investigation into Hunter Biden.
The revelations from Weiss’ testimony highlight the need for further scrutiny and oversight of the DOJ’s actions. Lawmakers have a responsibility to ensure that justice is served and that there is no bias or political interference in the handling of this case.
The controversy surrounding Hunter Biden and the DOJ’s handling of the investigation has become a highly debated topic, with Republicans accusing the department of favoritism and Democrats dismissing the accusations as politically motivated. The lack of clear and consistent information from the DOJ only adds to the polarization and distrust among the American public.
Moving forward, it is imperative that the DOJ provide clear and detailed explanations for their decisions and actions. The American people deserve transparency and accountability from their government institutions, especially when it comes to matters of justice and law enforcement.
The case of Hunter Biden has already been a subject of intense scrutiny and speculation, and it is likely to continue to be so. It is essential that the investigation is conducted in a fair and impartial manner, free from any political influence or bias.
In conclusion, the denial of special attorney powers to David Weiss raises significant questions about the DOJ’s handling of the investigation into Hunter Biden. The changing narrative and inconsistent explanations provided by the department only add to the confusion and distrust surrounding the case. It is crucial for the DOJ to provide clear and transparent information and to conduct a fair and impartial investigation. The American people deserve nothing less than a justice system that operates with integrity and accountability.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...