Joe Biden’s brother informed the IRS about Hunter’s business partnership with a close associate of the Chinese President
President Joe Biden’s Brother Reveals Hunter Biden’s Business Connection to China
In a recent congressional interview, Jim Biden, the brother of President Joe Biden, disclosed that Hunter Biden had informed him about being involved in business with a “protege of President Xi” from China. The revelation came to light through notes from an IRS investigator. Jim Biden confirmed the information, stating that it was his recollection of what Hunter had told him.
However, Jim later clarified that his comment was a “term of art” and not meant to be taken literally. He admitted that it was a poorly chosen remark, referring to the Chinese Communist Party’s chairman as a “protege.”
During the interview, Jim also denied the existence of a meeting between himself, Hunter, Tony Bobulinski, and the now-president. This contradicted Hunter’s previous statements corroborating elements of the meeting to Congress.
Jim Biden expressed his disdain for Bobulinski, who claimed that Joe Biden had met with him and Hunter in 2017 regarding a lucrative deal with a Chinese energy firm. Jim vehemently denied Joe’s presence at the meeting, stating that he could have been there with Bobulinski and Hunter, but his brother was never present.
The transcript of Jim Biden’s deposition was released by the House Oversight and Judiciary committees, following Hunter Biden’s testimony. Hunter had admitted to being in the lobby bar with Bobulinski and his uncle when Joe Biden shook hands with Tony.
Jim Biden revealed that he had assisted Zang Jianjun, Chairman Ye’s lieutenant, in obtaining a U.S. visa, finding an apartment in New York City, and locating a school for his children. He claimed that his actions were driven by personal kindness and a desire to familiarize Zang and his family with the city.
Jim also mentioned that Zang had given Hunter a diamond, which Hunter later gave to him. However, Jim discarded the diamond after a jeweler appraised it as being worth only a few hundred dollars.
Regarding Joe Biden’s statement that his family did not take money from China, Jim Biden defended his brother, stating that CEFC, the Chinese energy firm, was a private company. He believed that CEFC was not government-affiliated based on Hunter’s word, despite acknowledging Hunter’s erratic behavior.
Jim Biden further claimed that Joe Biden had no knowledge of the CEFC deal, contradicting other evidence. The IRS had interviewed Jim Biden and reviewed evidence related to Hunter Biden’s affairs, some of which was presented during the congressional deposition.
Jim Biden admitted to encouraging Hunter to exclude Bobulinski and other partners from the CEFC deal, as they had not brought any investment leads. However, he could not provide any examples of investment leads generated by Hunter.
Regarding the $240,000 in checks written by Jim Biden to Joe Biden, which were traced back to CEFC, Jim stated that it was repayment for a loan from Joe. However, it remains unclear whether bank records confirm Joe’s transfer of that money.
Jim Biden vehemently denied specific allegations made in a Politico story, which claimed that he had invoked his brother’s name while conducting business with Americore, a hospital firm. He dismissed these claims as ridiculous.
Jim Biden also refuted the article’s assertion that he and Americore’s founder had discussed plans to involve Joe Biden in the company. He called these claims absurd.
Jim Biden acknowledged sending an email to a healthcare executive mentioning his brother, but he insisted that it did not change his previous answers. He agreed that it would be odd for someone to put Joe Biden on speakerphone during a business meeting unrelated to him.
During the interview, Jim Biden went off on tangents and revealed his close relationship with Hunter Biden, citing their shared experiences as recovering alcoholics. He also admitted to taking loans from John Hynansky, a car dealership owner in Ukraine and Delaware, who was mentioned by President Biden during his time as Vice President.
Jim Biden confessed that he had not repaid the loans because the lender, who is wealthy, has not pressed him for repayment. He also mentioned that Hunter Biden had asked him to thank Hollywood lawyer Kevin Morris for paying off his tax debts on behalf of the family, implying that he was speaking on behalf of Joe Biden.
How do the allegations against Hunter Biden raise concerns about conflicts of interest and foreign influence in the Biden family?
Related to the business connection between Hunter Biden and China. However, no conclusive evidence was found to directly implicate Joe Biden in the deal.
It is important to note that Jim Biden’s statements should be treated with caution, as he is the brother of the president and may have a bias in defending his family. Nevertheless, the information provided in the congressional interview and the released transcripts shed light on the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings in China and their potential implications for the current administration.
The allegations against Hunter Biden have been a subject of political controversy, with Republicans raising concerns about possible conflicts of interest and the potential for foreign influence in the Biden family. These concerns are heightened due to Hunter Biden’s past business dealings in Ukraine, which have also faced scrutiny.
While it is not uncommon for family members of politicians to engage in business ventures, the nature of Hunter Biden’s connections with China raises valid questions about the transparency and ethics surrounding his activities. The fact that his uncle, Jim Biden, was involved in facilitating the visa and other arrangements for Zang Jianjun, the Chairman’s lieutenant, raises eyebrows and highlights the complexity of the Biden family’s relationship with China.
Hunter Biden’s acceptance of a diamond from Zang Jianjun, as mentioned by Jim Biden, adds another layer of intrigue to the story. The fact that Jim discarded the diamond after its appraisal suggests that it may not have held significant monetary value, but the symbolism and potential implications of such a gift cannot be ignored.
Moreover, the contradictory statements made by various family members, including Hunter and Jim Biden, regarding the alleged meeting with Tony Bobulinski raise concerns about the truthfulness and transparency of the Biden family’s involvement in these business dealings. The inconsistencies in their testimonies call for a thorough investigation to uncover the facts and ascertain any potential wrongdoing.
It is crucial that the investigation into Hunter Biden’s business connections to China remains unbiased and nonpartisan. The American people deserve to know the truth about any potential conflicts of interest and the extent of foreign influence in the Biden family’s affairs. Transparency and accountability are fundamental principles that must be upheld to maintain public trust in the democratic process and the integrity of the presidency.
As the scrutiny surrounding Hunter Biden’s business dealings continues, it is essential to separate fact from speculation and base conclusions on concrete evidence. The ongoing investigation into these matters will undoubtedly shape the public’s perception of the Biden administration and its commitment to ethical governance. Only through a thorough and impartial examination can the truth be uncovered and the necessary measures taken to address any potential ethical or legal concerns.
Ultimately, it is crucial for President Joe Biden to address the concerns surrounding his family’s business connections honestly and transparently. By doing so, he can demonstrate his commitment to upholding the highest standards of integrity and ensure that the public’s trust in his administration remains steadfast. The American people deserve nothing less.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...