John Podesta influenced Biden’s halt on natural gas exports, benefiting his lobbyist brother

Biden Administration Climate Envoy Linked to Pause in U.S. LNG Exports

In⁢ a controversial move, John Podesta, ‍the climate envoy for the Biden administration,⁤ has been identified as the driving force ⁣behind the decision to ‍halt U.S. liquefied natural ​gas (LNG) exports. This decision has raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as Podesta’s brother, Tony Podesta, ⁤has a history​ of ⁣lobbying for foreign LNG companies, including one with ties to a Russian‍ energy oligarch.

According to sources,⁢ John Podesta played a significant role in shaping the new LNG policy, which is‌ seen by some as a concession to green energy ⁤activists within the ⁢Democratic ⁣Party. Notably,‌ influential left-leaning donors, such as charities funded by the⁢ Rockefeller brothers and Michael Bloomberg, have poured substantial amounts of money into environmental groups that⁣ have advocated for restrictions on ⁤new LNG permits, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

However, critics argue that this decision could also benefit Tony Podesta’s clients, as he has long represented​ foreign companies involved in the LNG industry. ​Over the past decade, Tony Podesta has worked for LNG group Golden Pass, co-owned by QatarEnergy, and‌ Bulgarian company Protos Energy,⁤ which hired him ⁤to address LNG-related matters.

Since 2022, Tony Podesta’s firm has received over $1 million ‌from Gemcorp, an investment fund ⁣with connections to Russia ​that was​ barred from participating in a Bulgarian LNG⁢ and energy development⁢ project. This ⁤raises concerns about the potential overlap between Tony Podesta’s lobbying work and his ​brother’s role in the Biden administration,‌ similar to ‍the scrutiny he ​faced for his work with the Chinese telecom company Huawei.

Energy industry insiders​ have warned that ⁢the pause on LNG export permits could benefit America’s foreign energy rivals, particularly Qatar and Russia, both major⁣ LNG exporters.⁢ Mike Sommers, CEO‌ of the American ​Petroleum Institute, described the decision as a “win for Russia⁤ and a loss ⁤for American allies, U.S. jobs, and ​global ⁣climate progress.”

Gemcorp, a company represented by Tony Podesta since 2022, has faced controversy due to its Russian roots. The company’s founder and chairman, Atanas‍ Bostandjiev, ⁤previously worked for a Russian state-owned bank that was sanctioned internationally. Gemcorp ‌received initial funding from Russian⁣ energy⁢ tycoon Albert Avdolyan‍ and telecom mogul Serguei Adoniev, who sold a company connected to a sanctioned Russian defense conglomerate.

Despite attempts to distance itself from Russia, Gemcorp’s ⁢involvement in Russian grain exports and its agreement with ⁣Moscow-controlled Sberbank have drawn criticism. The Bulgarian ‌government revoked its energy modernization deal with Gemcorp ‍after concerns were raised about the company’s links to Russia.

Prior ⁤to his ​work‌ with Gemcorp, Tony Podesta represented Protos Energy, a company with an interest in the U.S. LNG market. He also lobbied​ for Golden Pass, a joint venture of QatarEnergy and ExxonMobil, between‌ 2013⁤ and 2018.

Neither Tony Podesta, the White House, ‌nor Gemcorp have responded to requests ‍for comment on these allegations.

What impact does the decision⁤ to halt U.S. LNG exports have on the growth of the industry and the American ​economy?

Ich has⁤ partnered with Russian billionaire Gennady Timchenko, a⁢ known ally of President Vladimir⁤ Putin. Tony Podesta’s connections raise suspicions about a potential conflict of interest in John Podesta’s role as the climate envoy.

The decision to halt U.S. LNG exports ⁣comes at a time ⁣when⁤ the industry was experiencing significant growth. The United States has emerged⁣ as a major exporter of LNG, thanks to its abundant natural gas reserves and new⁢ extraction technologies. This has not only contributed to energy independence but ⁢has also created‌ jobs and boosted the‌ economy.

The Biden administration’s focus on climate change is understandable ⁢and commendable.‌ Addressing the global climate crisis ⁣requires significant ⁢efforts to⁢ transition to cleaner and more ⁣sustainable energy ‍sources. ⁢However, ‌the decision to halt LNG exports raises ⁣questions about the administration’s approach and ‌the potential influence of vested interests.

The concern is⁢ that John Podesta’s ties to his brother’s clients may have ⁢influenced the⁢ policy decision, favoring foreign LNG companies over domestic ‍interests. This not only undermines the administration’s commitment to job creation and economic growth ⁤but also raises doubts about the integrity⁣ of the decision-making‍ process.

Moreover, critics ⁢argue that ⁢the ‌decision⁢ to halt LNG exports may not have the desired impact on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Natural⁤ gas is considered a cleaner alternative‍ to coal⁣ and oil, and its exportation allows other countries to reduce their ⁢reliance on dirtier​ fossil⁤ fuels. By halting exports, the Biden ​administration may inadvertently push countries to revert to more polluting energy sources.

It is crucial for the Biden administration to address these concerns and ensure transparency in decision-making processes. Efforts to⁢ combat climate change should not be clouded by potential conflicts of interest ‌or‍ favoritism ‍towards foreign ⁤companies.

As the climate envoy, John Podesta must prioritize ⁤the interests of‍ the American people‌ and align his decisions with the overall objectives​ of⁣ the Biden administration. ​It ‍is ⁢essential to strike a balance ​between promoting clean energy and supporting domestic energy industries.

Moving⁣ forward, the administration should consider consulting⁣ a diverse range of stakeholders, including domestic industry ⁤representatives, economists, and environmentalists, to make informed decisions that benefit both​ the⁤ environment and the ⁤American economy.

In ‍conclusion, the decision to ​halt U.S. ‌LNG exports, reportedly influenced⁤ by ‌John Podesta, raises concerns about potential conflicts of​ interest and favors foreign companies over domestic interests. The ⁢Biden⁣ administration must address these concerns to ensure transparency and uphold its commitment to combat climate change while supporting job creation and economic growth.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker