Jordan: DOJ allowed Hunter Biden’s alleged 2014-15 tax crimes to slide for obvious reasons

Jordan: It’s Clear ⁢Why DOJ Let ⁢Hunter Biden’s Alleged 2014-15 Tax Crimes Go

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan asserted⁤ on⁤ Thursday that the Department of Justice deliberately allowed Hunter Biden’s alleged tax crimes from 2014 and 2015 to go unpunished⁣ in order ⁤to protect his father, President Joe Biden.

In an interview on Fox News, the Ohio Republican‍ made his⁤ case ahead of the closed-door⁤ testimony of former U.S.‍ attorney Lesley Wolf, who played a role in the decision. According ‍to Fox News, Wolf ⁢recently⁢ resigned after IRS whistleblower ‌ Gary Shapley testified this summer that she restricted ⁤questioning related to Biden ⁢and any references to him as “dad”‌ or “the big guy.”

Jordan expressed his curiosity about ‌why the investigation allowed the statute of limitations to expire for the tax years 2014‌ and 2015, when the majority ⁤of ⁣Burisma income was flowing into Hunter Biden’s accounts.

Hunter Biden secured a lucrative position with Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings, earning $1 million⁤ per year starting in 2014, while his father served as vice⁢ president and oversaw Ukraine ⁤policy under the Obama administration.

Jordan argued that investigating Burisma would ultimately lead to the White House, emphasizing the need ​to ‍uncover potential financial ‌benefits received by the Biden family. He highlighted ‌the actions of ⁣U.S. attorney David ‌Weiss and Lesley Wolf, accusing them of attempting to⁤ cover up and conceal the truth.

Four Fundamental Facts

Jordan outlined what⁣ he called “four fundamental facts” regarding the ⁤Bidens and Burisma:

  1. Hunter Biden joined Burisma’s board in 2014.
  2. He lacked the qualifications for the position.
  3. Burisma executives asked him to intervene in December 2015 to alleviate pressure from Ukrainian ‍government prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who was investigating corruption within the company.
  4. Shortly after, Joe Biden traveled to‌ Ukraine and demanded the firing‌ of prosecutor Shokin or else the ⁣country would​ lose $1 billion‌ in⁤ U.S. loan guarantees.

During ‍a trip to⁢ Kyiv⁤ in March 2016, Biden proudly recounted his role in⁤ getting the prosecutor⁢ fired, ⁣stating, “Well, son of a b****, he got fired.”

Jordan emphasized that these four facts make it abundantly clear that there were questionable actions taken by Joe and Hunter Biden. He also mentioned ​that​ IRS whistleblowers Shapley and Joseph Ziegler believed Hunter​ Biden should have been ​charged for tax crimes in 2014 and 2015, but the DOJ chose not to pursue those charges. However, this month,‌ the DOJ indicted Hunter Biden⁢ for not paying ⁢at least $1.4 million in​ federal taxes owed between 2016 and 2019.

According ⁣to the New York Post, Burisma reduced Hunter Biden’s board pay by more than⁤ half just two months after‍ Joe Biden left the vice presidency in January⁢ 2017. Hunter ‌Biden resigned from the ‍Burisma⁢ board in‌ April 2019, the same month his father announced his presidential campaign.


The post‍ Jordan: It’s Clear⁢ Why⁤ DOJ Let Hunter Biden’s Alleged 2014-15 Tax Crimes Go appeared first on The‌ Western Journal.


How does Jim Jordan argue⁣ that investigating⁤ Burisma ‍would ultimately lead to the White House and potential financial benefits received by the Biden family

JORDAN: IT’S CLEAR⁣ ⁢WHY DOJ LET ⁢HUNTER BIDEN’S ALLEGED 2014-15 TAX CRIMES GO

House ⁣Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan made a bold assertion on Thursday, suggesting that the Department of Justice deliberately chose not to pursue charges against⁢ Hunter Biden‌ for his alleged ⁣tax crimes in 2014 and ⁣2015 in‍ order to protect his father, President Joe⁣ Biden. In an interview on Fox News, the Ohio Republican presented his case ahead ⁢of the closed-door‌ testimony of former U.S. attorney​ Lesley Wolf, who played a role in the decision. According to Fox News, Wolf recently resigned after IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley testified this summer that she restricted questioning related‌ to Biden and ‌any references ⁢to‍ him as “dad” or “the‌ big guy.”

Jordan expressed his curiosity ⁤about why the investigation allowed the statute of limitations to expire for the tax years​ 2014⁤ and 2015, which coincided‍ with the period of time when the majority of Burisma income was flowing into Hunter Biden’s accounts. It⁣ is well-known ⁣that⁢ Hunter⁤ Biden secured a lucrative position with Ukrainian energy firm Burisma Holdings,⁤ earning $1 million per year starting in 2014, while ‌his father ‍served as vice president and oversaw Ukraine⁤ policy under the Obama administration.

Jordan argued that​ investigating Burisma would ultimately lead to the ‍White House, emphasizing the ⁤need⁤ to uncover⁣ potential financial benefits received ‍by the Biden family. He‌ specifically‌ highlighted the actions of U.S. attorney David ⁢Weiss and Lesley ⁤Wolf, accusing them of attempting to cover up and conceal the truth.

To further support his claims, Jordan outlined what he ‍referred to‍ as “four fundamental facts” ⁤regarding the Bidens and Burisma:

1. Hunter Biden joined‌ Burisma’s board in 2014.

2. He lacked the ‍qualifications for the position.

3. Burisma executives ⁤asked him to intervene in December 2015 to alleviate pressure from Ukrainian government prosecutor ⁣Viktor Shokin,⁤ who was investigating corruption within the company.

4. Shortly after, Joe ⁣Biden traveled to Ukraine and demanded Shokin’s removal, threatening to withhold​ $1 billion in ⁤aid​ if the prosecutor was not ​fired.

Jordan’s argument ⁣centers around the notion that there was⁤ a clear connection between Hunter Biden’s involvement with Burisma and his father’s actions as vice president. By investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden’s alleged tax‌ crimes, Jordan believes‌ the truth about potential corruption⁢ and financial benefits‍ received by the Biden family could have been⁣ uncovered.

In⁤ light of the recent revelations and testimonies, the Department of Justice now faces scrutiny over its handling of the Hunter Biden investigation. As more⁢ details emerge, it remains to be seen whether further action‍ will be taken and if justice will be served. The American​ people deserve transparency and accountability, particularly when it involves allegations of wrongdoing ⁢by those in positions ‌of power. Only time will tell if the truth will prevail in this case.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker